Awesome, thanks so much!
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023, 8:01 PM Kenton Varda wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> Your idea would work initially, but if an @3 field were ever added, it
> could end up incompatible.
>
> Instead, assuming `Internal` is a struct type, you can instead declare
> `internal` to have type `AnyP
Hi Matt,
Your idea would work initially, but if an @3 field were ever added, it
could end up incompatible.
Instead, assuming `Internal` is a struct type, you can instead declare
`internal` to have type `AnyPointer`:
struct Event {
union {
foo @0 : Foo;
bar @1 : Bar;
internal @2: An
Hi Capnp folks,
I have a producer that writes events to a queue. The schema looks like:
struct Event {
union {
foo @0 : Foo;
bar @1 : Bar;
internal @2 : Internal;
}
}
There are downstream consumers of this queue that are meant to ignore the
"internal" field -- in fact, we don't
