[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2009062] Re: iso.qa.ubuntu.com accesses resources over http

2023-10-25 Thread Steve Langasek
fixed in the production drupal config. ** Changed in: ubuntu-qa-website Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Canonical's Ubuntu QA, which is subscribed to Ubuntu QA Website. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2009062 Title: iso.

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Merge] ~lvoytek/autopkgtest-cloud/+git/autopkgtest-package-configs:slurm-wlm-add-armhf-big_packages into ~ubuntu-release/autopkgtest-cloud/+git/autopkgtest-package-configs:main

2023-12-06 Thread Steve Langasek
The proposal to merge ~lvoytek/autopkgtest-cloud/+git/autopkgtest-package-configs:slurm-wlm-add-armhf-big_packages into ~ubuntu-release/autopkgtest-cloud/+git/autopkgtest-package-configs:main has been updated. Status: Needs review => Rejected For more details, see: https://code.launchpad.n

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2036730] Proposed package upload rejected

2023-12-06 Thread Steve Langasek
An upload of livecd-rootfs to jammy-proposed has been rejected from the upload queue for the following reason: "reuploading with proper -v". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Canonical's Ubuntu QA, which is subscribed to autopkgtest in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpa

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2036730] Proposed package upload rejected

2023-12-07 Thread Steve Langasek
An upload of livecd-rootfs to jammy-proposed has been rejected from the upload queue for the following reason: "reuploading with correct -v". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Canonical's Ubuntu QA, which is subscribed to autopkgtest in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchp

Re: [Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Merge] ~ubuntu-release/autopkgtest/+git/development:hide-warnings into ~ubuntu-release/autopkgtest/+git/development:master

2023-12-09 Thread Steve Langasek
As I understand it the code currently fails because there is output on stderr. But by redirecting stderr to stdout (2>&1), there will now be no output on stderr. So if we intend to detect and fail on other error output, this prevents that. -- https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/autopkgt

Re: [Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Merge] ~ubuntu-release/autopkgtest/+git/development:hide-warnings into ~ubuntu-release/autopkgtest/+git/development:master

2023-12-10 Thread Steve Langasek
Review: Needs Fixing Here is a horrible shell pipeline that filters out only 'W: ' lines from stderr, and then puts the rest of stdout and stderr back on the file descriptors where it's supposed to be. (apt-cache showsrc e2fsprogs 3>&1 1>&2 2>&3 3>&- | grep -v ^W: ) 3>&1 1>&2 2>&3 3>&- -- htt

Re: [Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Merge] ~ubuntu-release/autopkgtest/+git/development:hide-warnings into ~ubuntu-release/autopkgtest/+git/development:master

2023-12-10 Thread Steve Langasek
I suggest filing a bug against apt about not having any way to suppress warning messages on stderr. -- https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/autopkgtest/+git/development/+merge/457169 Your team Canonical's Ubuntu QA is subscribed to branch ~ubuntu-release/autopkgtest/+git/development:master

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2048067] Re: Links for Ubuntu Mantic Desktop RASPI not updated since 28Nov23 on Testing tracker site

2024-01-04 Thread Steve Langasek
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2045336 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045336 Because the image builds are failing. ** Project changed: ubuntu-qa-website => ubuntu-image ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2045336 [3.1+snap6] Attempts to write contents into a file whic

Re: [Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Merge] ~ubuntu-release/autopkgtest/+git/development:hide-warnings into ~ubuntu-release/autopkgtest/+git/development:master

2024-01-15 Thread Steve Langasek
Just to confirm, yes, the output should be identical between the two commands when there are no other sources of stderr messages -- https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/autopkgtest/+git/development/+merge/457169 Your team Canonical's Ubuntu QA is subscribed to branch ~ubuntu-release/autopk

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Merge] ~ubuntu-release/autopkgtest/+git/development:hide-warnings into ~ubuntu-release/autopkgtest/+git/development:master

2024-01-16 Thread Steve Langasek
The proposal to merge ~ubuntu-release/autopkgtest/+git/development:hide-warnings into ~ubuntu-release/autopkgtest/+git/development:master has been updated. Status: Needs review => Approved For more details, see: https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/autopkgtest/+git/development/+merge/

Re: [Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Merge] ~ubuntu-release/autopkgtest/+git/development:hide-warnings into ~ubuntu-release/autopkgtest/+git/development:master

2024-01-16 Thread Steve Langasek
Review: Approve -- https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/autopkgtest/+git/development/+merge/457169 Your team Canonical's Ubuntu QA is subscribed to branch ~ubuntu-release/autopkgtest/+git/development:master. -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ubuntu-qa Post to : cano

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2048914] Re: System program problem detected at every login Xubuntu Update Notifier

2024-01-16 Thread Steve Langasek
** Also affects: whoopsie (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Canonical's Ubuntu QA, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048914 Title: System program problem detected at every login X

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2048914] Re: System program problem detected at every login Xubuntu Update Notifier

2024-01-16 Thread Steve Langasek
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/whoopsie/+bug/2048914/+attachment/5738098/+files/apport.log shows thermald having crashed. If you disable the thermald service with `sudo systemctl disable thermald; sudo systemctl stop thermald` does the problem persist after the next couple of logins? *

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2035101] Re: autopkgtest failures are ignored, apparently for packages with only superficial tests

2024-01-17 Thread Steve Langasek
https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed- migration/log/noble/2024-01-12/23:28:17.log.gz shows that libwacom is in the 'autopkgtest-pending.json' for amd64 and s390x. So that's a bug, to start with. (We have a bug in general that state/autopkgtest-pending.json does not get properly garbage

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2035101] Re: autopkgtest failures are ignored, apparently for packages with only superficial tests

2024-01-17 Thread Steve Langasek
There are upstream changes to britney2/policies/autopkgtest.py touching relevant code. I think the right next step here is to rebase our britney2 branch against upstream and see if this persists. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Canonical's Ubuntu QA, which is sub

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2052617] Re: Layered flavor ISO images built without live user

2024-02-13 Thread Steve Langasek
I have rolled back ec5421ba from debian-cd to unblock builds of layered images, while we're waiting for the livecd-rootfs fix to land -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Canonical's Ubuntu QA, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2052617 Ti

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2054908] Re: gpg-wks-server pulls in postfix

2024-02-25 Thread Steve Langasek
What is the rationale for a gpg package pulling in an MTA at all? I think this needs assessed. ** Changed in: gnupg2 (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Canonical's Ubuntu QA, which is subscribed to Auto Package Testing. https:

Re: [Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2054908] Re: gpg-wks-server pulls in postfix

2024-02-25 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 07:13:30PM -, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > Steve - it is a server package for hosting a web key server, it's > entirely reasonable for it to depend on a mail transport agent. A WKS > server, upon uploading a key, sends confirmation emails to the UIDs in > the key, before

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2059228] Re: Lubuntu install replacing partition not expected

2024-03-27 Thread Steve Langasek
"For install Lubuntu QA website" I do not understand what this means. ** Changed in: ubuntu-qa-website Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu QA Website Developers, which is subscribed to Ubuntu QA Website. https://bugs.launchpa

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2059228] Re: Lubuntu install replacing partition not expected

2024-03-27 Thread Steve Langasek
ok. ** Changed in: ubuntu-qa-website Status: Incomplete => Triaged ** Changed in: ubuntu-qa-website Assignee: (unassigned) => Lubuntu Developers (lubuntu-dev) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu QA Website Developers, which is subscribed to Ubunt

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2061110] Re: Download speed is only 1.5 to 6.0 MB/sec for testing os

2024-04-12 Thread Steve Langasek
This is not a property of the website. My connection (which crosses an ocean) lets me download http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/kubuntu/daily- live/20240412/noble-desktop-amd64.iso in 10 minutes, with a consistent speed of > 6.0MB/s. We have no control over the networks between our data center and your

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 1981611] Re: conf file prompt during upgrade from Focal to Jammy

2022-07-19 Thread Steve Langasek
debian/speech-dispatcher.maintscript in the jammy version of speech- dispatcher removes /etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/mary-generic.conf but this package version also ships it. Should be a one-line fix. Bug would not be noticed in Debian because the maintscript entry has a version check of 0.10.

Re: [Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 1999584] Re: requests.cgi returns 403 even when logged in

2022-12-14 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 06:27:25PM -, Brian Murray wrote: > Actually we need to set the SRVNAME in the cookie file we are using with > curl so that we connect to the server with which we are logged in. Like > so: > autopkgtest.ubuntu.com TRUE/ TRUE0 SRVNAME S2 I have been

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 1999584] Re: requests.cgi returns 403 even when logged in

2022-12-14 Thread Steve Langasek
It was with S0 but I was seeing this problem before you deployed the new units, too. I have updated my cookie file now and we'll see next time I have a batch of tests to schedule how well it does. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Canonical's Ubuntu QA, which is s

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 1902287] Re: RAID-1 setup should install two boot partitions

2023-03-14 Thread Steve Langasek
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/testcases/1715/revisions/1761/info is listed as a test that's supposed to pass for all server image releases. But as written, it only works if the disk you remove is the second disk, not the first. ** Also affects: ubuntu-manual-tests Importance: Undecided

Re: [Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Merge] ~dbungert/ubuntu-manual-tests:fix-1715-boot into ubuntu-manual-tests:main

2023-03-15 Thread Steve Langasek
Review: Approve -- https://code.launchpad.net/~dbungert/ubuntu-manual-tests/+git/ubuntu-manual-tests/+merge/438999 Your team Ubuntu Testcase Admins is subscribed to branch ubuntu-manual-tests:main. -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ubuntu-qa Post to : canonical-ubuntu-qa@

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2012345] Re: Links for Ubuntu Lunar ISO downloads are incomplete

2023-03-29 Thread Steve Langasek
These have been fixed as seen at http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/444/builds/275082/downloads ** Changed in: ubuntu-qa-website Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Canonical's Ubuntu QA, which is subscribed to Ubuntu QA

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2015290] Re: [SRU Exception] Backport 5.28 to focal

2023-04-14 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello Heather, or anyone else affected, Accepted autopkgtest into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autopkgtest/5.28ubuntu0.20.04.0 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package.

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2015285] Re: [SRU Exception] Backport 5.28 to kinetic

2023-04-14 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello Heather, or anyone else affected, Accepted autopkgtest into kinetic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autopkgtest/5.28ubuntu0.22.10.0 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package.

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2008026] Re: [SRU Exception] Backport 5.28 to Jammy

2023-04-14 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello Heather, or anyone else affected, Accepted autopkgtest into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autopkgtest/5.28ubuntu0.22.04.0 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package.

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2021908] Re: fwupd: network-based tests failed to run

2023-06-06 Thread Steve Langasek
Mario, you asserted that there were jobs that "failed once and hit retry and they pass". But the links you posted are to the test runs for fwupd 1.9.1-1, which have never passed. Are you saying that there were individual tests within the two runs of 1.9.1-1/amd64 that demonstrated flakiness? (if

Re: [Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2021908] Re: fwupd: network-based tests failed to run

2023-06-06 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 10:37:02PM -, Mario Limonciello wrote: > Yes, but the logs are destroyed when you hit retry so I don't have the > logs of fail followed by pass. No, autopkgtest logs are not destroyed. That is only true for package build logs. -- You received this bug notification be

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2021908] Re: fwupd: network-based tests failed to run

2023-06-22 Thread Steve Langasek
working on building it in a ppa here https://launchpad.net/~canonical- foundations/+archive/ubuntu/ppa (just have to wait a cycle because I set up the new ppa with the wrong options initially) then will trigger an autopkgtest for it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2021908] Re: fwupd: network-based tests failed to run

2023-06-22 Thread Steve Langasek
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-mantic-vorlon- ppa/mantic/s390x/f/fwupd/20230623_011450_1ce26@/log.gz shows a failure: [...] 165s failed to load emulation data: emulation is not allowed from config 165s FAIL: fwupd/fwupd.test (Child process exited with code 1) [...] 165s Update

Re: [Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Merge] ~lvoytek/autopkgtest-cloud/+git/autopkgtest-package-configs:slurm-wlm-add-armhf-big_packages into ~ubuntu-release/autopkgtest-cloud/+git/autopkgtest-package-configs:m

2023-07-17 Thread Steve Langasek
Review: Disapprove Because armhf runners are containers instead of VMs (and thus have no per-runner memory limits), big_packages will have no effect here. You can try rerunning and hope there is not memory contention on the lxd host at the time it is run. But I don't see anything in the log t

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2015290] Re: [SRU Exception] Backport 5.28 to focal

2023-07-21 Thread Steve Langasek
The version of autopkgtest in the proposed pocket of Focal that was purported to fix this bug report has been removed because one or more bugs that were to be fixed by the upload have failed verification and been in this state for more than 10 days. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-focal ** C

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2015290] Proposed package removed from archive

2023-07-21 Thread Steve Langasek
The version of autopkgtest in the proposed pocket of Focal that was purported to fix this bug report has been removed because one or more bugs that were to be fixed by the upload have failed verification and been in this state for more than 10 days. ** Tags removed: verification-needed -- You re

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2035319] Re: Links for Ubuntu Mantic Desktop not updating on Testing tracker site

2023-09-13 Thread Steve Langasek
This was fixed in livecd-rootfs 23.10.36, uploaded today. ** Project changed: ubuntu-cdimage => livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Canonical's Ubuntu QA, which is

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2037755] [NEW] should not allow trigger=migration-reference/0 + all-proposed=1

2023-09-29 Thread Steve Langasek
Public bug reported: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsoup3/+bug/2036444 was filed to manually track a regression in the autopkgtests of libsoup3 on s390x. It had to be filed manually because a wrongly submitted autopkgtest with trigger=migration-reference/0 and all-proposed=1 prevent

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2037755] Re: should not allow trigger=migration-reference/0 + all-proposed=1

2023-09-30 Thread Steve Langasek
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1964618 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964618 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1964618 Possible to get migration-reference/0 result with proposed packages installed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Can

Re: [Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Merge] ~cpete/ubuntu-manual-tests:cpete/update-amd64-netboot-tests into ubuntu-manual-tests:main

2023-10-13 Thread Steve Langasek
Review: Needs Fixing Looks good, but there are a few things that should be adjusted before landing this. Inline comments apply to both test cases for the most part Diff comments: > diff --git a/testcases/image/1734_PXE UEFI Netboot (Server live) > b/testcases/image/1734_PXE UEFI Netboot (Serv

Re: [Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Merge] ~cpete/ubuntu-manual-tests:cpete/update-amd64-netboot-tests into ubuntu-manual-tests:main

2023-10-17 Thread Steve Langasek
Review: Approve -- https://code.launchpad.net/~cpete/ubuntu-manual-tests/+git/ubuntu-manual-tests/+merge/453468 Your team Ubuntu Testcase Admins is subscribed to branch ubuntu-manual-tests:main. -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ubuntu-qa Post to : canonical-ubuntu-qa@lis

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2071609] Please test proposed package

2024-10-18 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello Skia, or anyone else affected, Accepted autopkgtest into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autopkgtest/5.38ubuntu1~22.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2071609] Re: [SRU exception] backport 5.38ubuntu1 to Jammy and Noble

2024-10-18 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello Skia, or anyone else affected, Accepted autopkgtest into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autopkgtest/5.38ubuntu1~24.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See