[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 1970069] Re: Annoying boot messages interfering with splash screen

2024-01-31 Thread Daniel van Vugt
> You could detect both parameters to avoid that corner case. Sure one can check for "splash nomodeset" to avoid the confusion in most cases, but that wouldn't fix it for "splash $DRIVER.modeset=0" or less common architectures which might have no primary framebuffer. I guess we can tell people who

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 1970069] Re: Annoying boot messages interfering with splash screen

2024-01-31 Thread Daniel van Vugt
BTW bug 2050743 is making the situation worse on noble. It will be fixed shortly. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Canonical's Ubuntu QA, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970069 Title: Annoying boot messages interfering with splas

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 1971434] Re: Display powersave only blanks, but does not turn off

2024-01-31 Thread Force
The MUTTER_DEBUG_ENABLE_ATOMIC_KMS worked for me as well, thank you! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Canonical's Ubuntu QA, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971434 Title: Display powersave only blanks, but does not turn off Stat

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Merge] autopkgtest-cloud:d-a-r-devel-first into autopkgtest-cloud:master

2024-01-31 Thread Brian Murray
Brian Murray has proposed merging autopkgtest-cloud:d-a-r-devel-first into autopkgtest-cloud:master. Requested reviews: Canonical's Ubuntu QA (canonical-ubuntu-qa) For more details, see: https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/autopkgtest-cloud/+git/autopkgtest-cloud/+merge/459753 While it

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2051851] Re: Error: package does not exist

2024-01-31 Thread Tim Andersson
Thanks for reporting! ** Changed in: auto-package-testing Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Canonical's Ubuntu QA, which is subscribed to Auto Package Testing. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051851 Title: Error: package does

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2051851] Re: Error: package does not exist

2024-01-31 Thread Tim Andersson
Known issue, the db is currently incomplete and it's being repopulated right now. Everything will be back to normal in a couple days I imagine. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Canonical's Ubuntu QA, which is subscribed to Auto Package Testing. https://bugs.launch

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2051851] [NEW] Error: package does not exist

2024-01-31 Thread dann frazier
Public bug reported: I'm currently unable to view the test history of any package using the web interface, for example: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/l/linux-nvidia-6.5/jammy/arm64 ** Affects: auto-package-testing Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this b

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 1970069] Re: Annoying boot messages interfering with splash screen

2024-01-31 Thread Mario Limonciello
You could detect both parameters to avoid that corner case. Alternatively this is something I feel simpledrm will help you avoid hitting too. Otherwise it sounds good to me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Canonical's Ubuntu QA, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. ht

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 1968330] Re: ubuntu_ltp:fs:gf15 growfiles.c:134: Test failed (Hit max errors value of 1)

2024-01-31 Thread Po-Hsu Lin
@hui.wang I have added df -h command to the test and restarted those failing instance, the free disk space are just 1.9G, I will add a hint with bug 1936305 (No space left on device) for them this time. Meanwhile I will discuss with other TNT folks to see if we can bump the disk size. -- You r

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 1970069] Re: Annoying boot messages interfering with splash screen

2024-01-31 Thread Daniel van Vugt
A new attempt at a kernel patch. While this is pleasingly simple and reliable in my own testing, it has a bug when "splash" is used at the same time as there being no primary framebuffer (like with "nomodeset"). I'm not sure if that's a realistic concern and am reluctant to go back to delays to pap

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2000901] Re: aa-logprof complained about libvirt include file not found on K-s390x

2024-01-31 Thread Po-Hsu Lin
** Tags added: 5.15 jammy ** Tags added: sru-20240108 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Canonical Platform QA Team, which is subscribed to ubuntu-kernel-tests. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2000901 Title: aa-logprof complained about libvirt include file not f

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2020607] Re: ftracetest from selftests in linux ADT test failure with jammy/linux-intel-iotg (kernel NULL pointer dereference)

2024-01-31 Thread Po-Hsu Lin
After splitting ubuntu_kselftests_ftrace out and run test cases one-by- one, we can see it's failing with the second test case, ftrace:test.d-- 00basic--basic2.tc, on J-intel-iotg-5.15.0-1048.54 with node rizzo. However I was unable to reproduce this manually on rizzo: * Passed with running just

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 1983357] Re: test_021_aslr_dapper_libs from ubuntu_qrt_kernel_security failed on K-5.19 / J-OEM-6.1 / J-6.2 AMD64

2024-01-31 Thread Stefan Bader
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Canonical Platform QA Team, which is subscribed to ubuntu-kernel-tests. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1983357 Title: test_021_aslr_dapper_libs from

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Merge] ~hyask/auto-upgrade-testing-specifications:skia/remove_lunar into auto-upgrade-testing-specifications:main

2024-01-31 Thread Skia
Skia has proposed merging ~hyask/auto-upgrade-testing-specifications:skia/remove_lunar into auto-upgrade-testing-specifications:main. Requested reviews: Canonical Platform QA Team (canonical-platform-qa) For more details, see: https://code.launchpad.net/~hyask/auto-upgrade-testing-specificati

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 1970069] Re: Annoying boot messages interfering with splash screen

2024-01-31 Thread Daniel van Vugt
Hmm, no plymouthd isn't starting quite early enough in Noble: 2.799s - plymouthd starts 4.080s - first show-splash attempt (rejected because DRM hasn't started yet) 5.290s - found /dev/dri/card0 5.364s - showing splash screen What this means is that any attempt to fix the bug in plymouthd itself