SoCalCakeBaker wrote:
> Hi Rodrego,
>
> It doesn't look like you called render() in your controller action...
>
Thanks SoCalCakeBaker, a simple $this->render() at the end of the
action seems to have solved the problem! I'll try some more tests, but
I think that solved it...
Thanks!
--~--~-
Hi Rodrego,
It doesn't look like you called render() in your controller action...
B.
On Oct 17, 1:05 pm, "Rodrigo Tassinari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You're right Chris, here's my code, hope you guys spot something I'm
> doing wrong.
>
> This is the regular PHP file, which works fine:
>
> l
Well - sounds like the CakePHP team has this under control. :)
Where in the 1.2 branch can I see how you guys did this?
B.
On Oct 17, 12:10 pm, "nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You *can* do pagination (almost) completely in the model, but when you
> see how it is implemented in 1.2, you'll
You are probably not passing the var $page to your find
list($order,$limit,$page) = $this->Pagination->init();
$this->data = $this->Course->findAll(null, null, $order, $limit,
$page);
HTH,
AD7six
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are s
I mean that the same five (or 20, 30, etc.) results are displayed
whether you are on page one or page 101.
So this is page 2:
--
id vcourse_prefix course_title
1 CLA Classical Mythology
2 AST Descriptive Astronomy
3 E
You're right Chris, here's my code, hope you guys spot something I'm
doing wrong.
This is the regular PHP file, which works fine:
links.php
\");\n";
echo " document.write(\"\");\n";
echo "document.write(\"Usando
o Google Adsense para gerar recursos para o seu projeto livre |
BR-Linux.org\")
I have a div with id="albumCover". I'm using $ajax->dropRemote() to
turn it into a drop zone that calls a Controller method. It only
responds when an image with the class="draggers" is dropped on it.
I've got that part down just fine. My problem is that the method it is
calling needs to know so
On 10/17/06, Rodrigo Tassinari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I tested both suggestions: using the ajax layout ($this->layout =
> 'ajax' ) and changing the the header to header("Content-type:
> text/javascript");. Both did not work. :(
>
> I know this is happening because of something to do with C
I tested both suggestions: using the ajax layout ($this->layout =
'ajax' ) and changing the the header to header("Content-type:
text/javascript");. Both did not work. :(
I know this is happening because of something to do with CakePHP,
because it works if I just use a regular php file to output t
yea try it
On 10/17/06, Chris Hartjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 10/17/06, Samuel DeVore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > no but it does make it private 'like' in cakephp in that it can not be
> > called with the /controller/method from the browser.
>
> Hey Sam,
>
> Is this actually a fe
Great! Thanks for your help. I'll continue to consider ACL. But since I
want (non-techy) end-users to be able to manage permissions for those
in their hierarchy, I don't want them to be confused with having to
grant access to particlar controllers or function names (actions), etc.
So in this sys
On 10/17/06, Samuel DeVore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> no but it does make it private 'like' in cakephp in that it can not be
> called with the /controller/method from the browser.
Hey Sam,
Is this actually a feature in CakePHP that it won't let object methods
that start with an underscore be
no but it does make it private 'like' in cakephp in that it can not be
called with the /controller/method from the browser.
On 10/17/06, Chris Hartjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 10/15/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Just preceed the function name with a underscore.
We're trying to get a dev version out in the next couple weeks.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake
PHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from th
You *can* do pagination (almost) completely in the model, but when you
see how it is implemented in 1.2, you'll realize why that's an
astoundingly bad idea. Also, "decorating" data is a task reserved for
the View, and putting View logic in the Model violates the most basic
principles of MVC and i
On 10/15/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Just preceed the function name with a underscore.
>
/me counts to five before replying to avoid getting labeled as angry or uncaring
Please note, the following rant is based on PHP, not Cake
Adding an underscore to a function name DO
The ability to call base class methods directly has already been
removed. Just grab the latest Cake version.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake
PHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to ca
hey again Felix,
hard to say what it could be without seeing the code, but have you
remembered to include your loadValidation() in your model? and to call
it prior to validation? this could be the problem.
also, looking at your code above, unless you had global variables
turned on, i don't know
Clearly the ideal solution would be to forgo the use of Internet
Explorer altogether...
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake
PHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.co
It might be because your header is wrong. header("Content-type:
application/x-javascript" ); should be header("Content-type:
text/javascript"); to match the type of the requested content.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed
On 10/17/06, Rodrigo Tassinari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I need to serve Javascript as the output of one action, instead of
> regurlar HTML. The purpose is that i want to be able to call this
> action from other pages outsite cake (in another domain) like so:
>
> http://mysite/
Hello all,
I need to serve Javascript as the output of one action, instead of
regurlar HTML. The purpose is that i want to be able to call this
action from other pages outsite cake (in another domain) like so:
http://mysite/controller/action";
type="text/javascript">
So the output of my act
The only time an app controller instance is ever created is when you
have an error ;).
But is that really relavent, from yoru first message:
you have code in your app controller referring to accessExceptions
The error message doesn't refer to your users controller
your pages controller (the on in
Absolutely. But when does Cake ever create an Animal alone? Doesn't it
always create a Dog, which is an animal?
Or in Cake terms: When do we ever have just an App? Won't it always be
a user? Does Cake ever create an AppController by itself? Isn't it
instead creating a UserController which extends
Hello all,
I need to serve Javascript as the output of one action, instead of
regurlar HTML. The purpose is that i want to be able to call this
action from other pages outsite cake (in another domain) like so:
http://mysite/controller/action";
type="text/javascript">
So the output of my act
if the UserController extends AppController then (essentially) when you create an instance of the UserController class it contains all the members of the AppController Class as well as what's defined in UserController. They're created effectively as a single object.
So, by putting something in User
Quick FYI:
You can ask her to point you to the pastebin using "~bin" or
"~paste". If you want someone else to paste something you can "~tell
nickName about bin", or "~tell nickName about paste".
Doing this autofills your IRC nick in a form field for the paste.
Instead of copying and pastin
Alright. That makes sense.
But since the Users controller extends the App controller, if I go to a
page like:
/users/add
Shouldn't that be creating a User object rather than an App object? So
that when the beforeFilter runs, it's running through the User object?
For example, if I put the beforeFil
Well it's what I mean by "ajaxifying" the "select" trough the onChange
...
Now just have to choose among solutions :-)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake
PHP" group.
To post to this group, send e
hi. you can´t access the variables of the user controller in your app
controller!!
app controller is the base class of user controller, so you can access
methods and variables of the app controller in your user controller, but
the app controller don´t know the user controller!!
--~--~-
I'm setting a few variables in my UserController that I want to access
in my AppController (in the beforeFilter). But I'm getting this error:
Notice: Undefined property: PagesController::$accessExceptions in
C:\websites\klickfile.com\app\app_controller.php on line 67
I get the same error with the
Ok. I believe the IonCube tools allow for copyright notices to be left
unencoded anyway, I'd have to check the documentation to be sure but
I'm sure it mentioned something along those lines.
On Oct 17, 3:51 pm, "nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll ask gwoo to weigh in here, since he's the IP
I'll ask gwoo to weigh in here, since he's the IP attorney, but I'm
pretty sure the only stipulations with the MIT License are with regard
to the copyright notice. So if you wanted to go to the trouble, you
could remove the copyright from the files, encode them, then add the
copyright back at the
So, now i figured out how to handle sessions. And it is extremely
simple!
For all those, who are also thinking about using sessions, here is what
I did:
In the core.php in the /app/config folder I've set the following line
to tmp, because I want cake to store the data in the tmp folder
de
IANAL, but I think that the no encryption/modification restrictions
apply to an application that you're either selling or giving away. If
you supply your client with an un-modified Cake Core, you've lived up
to the license. Anything they do after that is for their own use.
There's nothing stoppin
You're telling me... I've been pushing the need since I started here to
finish up a couple of other projects that are nearly ready to go
online... trouble is this client takes up so much of our time, with us
being only a small team, that we don't really get chance to tackle
anything else.
I'll be
On 10/17/06, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> MrTufty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...]
> > We're in a position with one of our clients where we simply can't trust
> > them not to tamper with the code we've written for them. This would be
> > ok, but anything that goes wrong with it they blame
Sadly, not my decision to make... although that checksum idea might not
be a bad one for future reference, I'll put that forward to the
directors. I don't think we'll be dumping them though, they really are
our main client at the moment and their business is worth a huge
amount. Plus they'd probab
MrTufty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...]
> We're in a position with one of our clients where we simply can't trust
> them not to tamper with the code we've written for them. This would be
> ok, but anything that goes wrong with it they blame us for even when
> it's their fault. [...]
Why not chec
On 10/17/06, MrTufty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This might unfortunately be a sticking point.
>
> We're in a position with one of our clients where we simply can't trust
> them not to tamper with the code we've written for them. This would be
> ok, but anything that goes wrong with it they bla
This wouldn't strictly speaking be Ajax, at least not the way I would
do it.
I'd trap the onchange event in the select tag:
Then have some javascript code to automatically select the other
options.
You COULD do it with Ajax (and this just occurred to me while writing
this post) by putti
You have to attach a remote_url to the onSelect event. There was a tuto
about Ajax with check boxes, basically it's the same approach.
When selecting a value, you would call an action using Ajax and will
update the div's that contains the fields.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~-
This might unfortunately be a sticking point.
We're in a position with one of our clients where we simply can't trust
them not to tamper with the code we've written for them. This would be
ok, but anything that goes wrong with it they blame us for even when
it's their fault. So, we use IonCube En
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> you can sell your cake-based apps for money, but you are not allowed to
> encrypt/remove copyright/... from the cake files.
...even from files from 'app' directory, which is quite annoying as it
(besides other things) little bit complicate auto generated
documentation
Luckily, I've been using Cake myself for the past couple of months - so
I'm about as much as we're likely to need for the moment :)
The other options are: keep doing things the same way they've always
been done here (we have a function library, but the functions it
includes are pretty specific to
You can use Cake, AND Smarty!
What are your other options to be honest? Write it all from scratch?
Use another framework?
Don't forget open source means community, and the Cake community is
growing rapidly, so most problems you'll encounter others have
encountered. Cake is also growing rapidly
But now I get the error: "Warning: Delimiter must not be alphanumeric
or backslash in app/app_model.php on line 82".
In other topics I've read that maybe the function for the validation is
not recognized. But in my example there is no chance of spelling it
wrong (the example from my the post befor
you can sell your cake-based apps for money, but you are not allowed to
encrypt/remove copyright/... from the cake files.
if your company doesnt know what the benefits of a framework are, i
wonder what kind of management is leading that company. I can't
imagine any software company *not* using a
Hi Dieter,
30 Minutes is more than enough. It only needs to be saved in the
session. So, then I will try to figure out, how $session->write works.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake
PHP" group.
T
how long does that data need to stay in the database? only during the
session? (like 30, 45 minutes, whatever?) then you could just save it
all save it in the session ($session->write())
if longer then that, i would just create a user_id field in the
datatable to store the user_id.
--~--~--
Hi guys,
I'm working as a web developer now, and I've been trying to convince
the directors of the company that using some open-source libraries to
build our sites would be a good move. I've almost managed to convince
them that having a template engine is a good idea - with demonstrations
of what
YEah !
This will be cool feature in cake 1.2
Nate, can you tell us when we can expect 1.2 to be published?
tnx in advance
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake
PHP" group.
To post to this group, s
OK, I figured that one out. I simply forgot to write the "" tags in the error.php file. Stupid mistake...
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake
PHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-p
Thanks for the links. I have followed this tutorial step by step, but
somehow there is a error in my validation rules:
My model:
var $validate = array(
'email1' => array('enteredAdress','Enter at least one
contact'),
'email2' => array('enteredAdress','Enter at least one
contact'
Thanks, I will give it a try!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake
PHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PRO
Thanks so far for the answers!
I have an index-page with a form. The user enters data and saves it to
the database (data-table).
The data-table has a "data_id" as key.
Now I would like to save this actual data_id for the user. So the user
can go to different pages and when he comes back to the in
sessions are given an id automatically by the php engine, you don't
need to do anything manually for that. same about the handling, it's
all automatically.
you can basically just use the session without doing any checking on
your own, you can trust php for that. (it's not perfectly secure, but
it
Not yet, thank you Léo, I will.
Have a nice day
Sten
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake
PHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, s
58 matches
Mail list logo
