> Screenshot of the simple report in DataStudio based on the mentioned data.
> [image: image.png]
If there was supposed to be a screenshot, it didn't make it.
-Zach
On 2020/11/20 11:56:18, Tobiasz Kędzierski
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There was discussion recently about usage of GitHub Actions [GA
One of the biggest ways that Traffic Control benefits from GH Actions is
that workflows run on forks, which only counts towards that user's 20
runner limit. As a result, our contributors have less cleanup work to do by
the time they open a PR.
Since running on all forks is not an option with Jenki
0 concurrent jobs"
limit.
>VAST majority of our traffic comes from PRs from forks.
Same for us.
-Zach
On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 3:12 PM Jarek Potiuk
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 10:45 PM Zach Hoffman wrote:
>
> > One of the biggest ways that Traffic Control benefits from
in Traffic Control, we build an Alpine image <
https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/pkgs/container/trafficcontrol%2Fci%2Ftrafficserver-alpine>,
with Traffic Server baked into it, for amd64 and arm64 . Rather than
building them both from the same machine, the amd64 and arm64 images in
separate G
Oops, the container link got mangled, it was supposed to be <
https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/pkgs/container/trafficcontrol/ci/trafficserver-alpine
>.
On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 9:38 AM Zach Hoffman wrote:
> in Traffic Control, we build an Alpine image <
> https://gi
Never mind, the first link was better
-Zach
On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 9:46 AM Zach Hoffman wrote:
> Oops, the container link got mangled, it was supposed to be <
> https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/pkgs/container/trafficcontrol/ci/trafficserver-alpine
> >.
>
> On Tue
