FYI: We seen the same errors for Log4j 2.
Gary
On Oct 12, 2017 07:26, "Marshall Schor" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are getting failing builds where the build itself succeeds, but a
> subsequent
> failure happens at the post-build step of transferring artifacts to
> apache.snapshots. Many of the artifa
Hi All:
Any ideas on how to solve "Return code is: 401, ReasonPhrase: Unauthorized.
"?
Thank you,
Gary
>
> -- Forwarded message -
> From: Apache Jenkins Server
> Date: Sun, Jul 8, 2018, 12:34
> Subject: Build failed in Jenkins: commons-dbcp #262
> To:
>
>
> See <
>
https://buil
FWIW, at my company, we develop on Java 8 and support Java 8 and 11 at
runtime.
Gary
On Thu, Jul 4, 2019, 23:05 Chris Lambertus wrote:
> All,
>
> We have received a number of tickets related to jdk9 and the libjli
> problem. I’m not sure exactly what the issue is, and we don’t have a
> solution
FYI: Over at Commons, we are slowly switching components to SpotBugs.
Gary
On Mon, Sep 2, 2019, 17:14 Matt Sicker wrote:
> It's still in the puppet file as far as I can tell:
>
> https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-puppet/blob/deployment/modules/build_slaves/manifests/jenkins.pp
>
> On Mon
Over at Apache Commons, I mostly pay attention to GitHub Actions builds on
Java LTS version plus the latest, plus the current EA, which currently
would be 8, 11, 16, and 17-EA.
Gary
On Sat, Jul 17, 2021, 08:45 Gavin McDonald wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 2:04 PM Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
> >
Most of Apache Common's components' are happy users of Dependabot, which is
used on our GitHub mirrored repositories.
Gary
On Sun, Aug 29, 2021, 10:38 lewis john mcgibbney wrote:
> Hi builds@,
> I was advised to ask my question here instead of general@incubator.
> Thanks for any feedback
>
> >
t time I tried I was informed that due to
> the program requiring write permissions to the repository, it wasn’t
> possible…
> This policy must have changed…
> Thanks for any info.
> lewismc
>
> On 2021/08/29 14:42:00 Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Most of Apache Common's com
ca00908dd48b645c1a7339@%3Ccommits.commons.apache.org%3E
> >
>
>
> This write access to commons-io appears to be in violation of the
> aforementioned policy.
>
> Dependabot's email alerts are currently the only acceptable method for
> working with the tool.
>
>
>
WRT Commons, CI is handled by GitHub actions these days so I am not worried
about losing ci.a.o.
TY
Gary
On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 6:38 AM Gavin McDonald wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> (This email is BCC many (19) lists, please reply to builds@apache.org
> only)
>
> Infra has set a FINAL date of January 31
On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 8:22 PM Gilles Sadowski
wrote:
> Le ven. 31 déc. 2021 à 14:17, Gary Gregory a
> écrit :
> >
> > WRT Commons, CI is handled by GitHub actions
>
> Whatever "handled" means here, is the sentence true for
> *all* components?
>
>
Do you have an example of such a GH Action?
Gary
On Tue, Feb 8, 2022, 07:25 Gavin McDonald wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> A recent feature pointed out by Jarek :
>
>
> https://github.blog/changelog/2022-01-14-github-actions-prevent-github-actions-from-approving-pull-requests/
>
> is to be able to disable
Over at Apache Commons, we've switched to GitHub Actions. We did use Travis
for a while but it makes more sense to me to use GitHub since it is fast,
reliable, and where we mirror our repositories.
Gary
On Thu, Sep 1, 2022, 05:52 P. Ottlinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> over the years Travis seems to have
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022, 00:32 Olivier Lamy wrote:
> moving the discussion to builds@
>
> On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 at 21:22, Nick Burch wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 17 Oct 2022, David Blevins wrote:
> > > On a modern machine the build takes 1.5 to 2 hours, so we're looking
> for
> > > some options that could
I never want to use Gradle, so certainly a no for Conmons from my POV.
Gary
On Fri, Dec 9, 2022, 06:41 Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hi
> Are we seriously activating this gradle enterprise to every build and
> so breaks a few builds without any notice?
>
>
> https://ci-maven.apache.org/job/Maven/job/ma
You can ask on the ML, I said "my POV".
Gary
On Fri, Dec 9, 2022, 07:29 Gavin McDonald wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2022 at 12:59 PM Gary Gregory
> wrote:
>
> > I never want to use Gradle, so certainly a no for Conmons from my POV.
> >
>
>
I agree with Christopher FWIW, I don't see the technical reason to not do
this. I'd use this feature in Apache Commons Parent and other POMs when
needed for example.
Gary
On Wed, Jun 7, 2023, 18:42 Christopher wrote:
> It doesn't matter that some projects are stuck on old versions, or
> their r
Hi David,
It would be quite helpful if you could let us know when GitHub is updated
to accept a 22-ea version. Apache Commons relies on GitHub for CI.
TY,
Gary
On Fri, Jul 28, 2023, 5:24 AM David Delabassee
wrote:
> Welcome to the OpenJDK Quality Outreach summer update.
>
> JDK 21 is now in R
Over at Apache Commons, I added Java 21 builds to most of our GitHub
Actions builds without issues. I've also added Java 22-ea builds in a
few select components.
(The Apache Commons "project" is made up of many "components", each
producing one or more jars.)
We did run into the difference in preci
Congratulations Jarkek :-)
I was glad to see a reference to
https://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-reproducible-builds.html
I hope we can keep that Maven page up-to-date with whatever comes up so we
only have to look in one place ; -)
Gary
On Sun, Jan 14, 2024, 2:06 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
We did something similar at Log4j to publish releases (I did not do
that set up but I do help on the project) so that a release manager
can use GitHub to publish releases instead of doing it on hardware
they control.
Gary
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 8:10 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
>
> Unless I hear othe
Can continuum be restarted? Perhaps the local maven cache needs to be
cleared?
Thank you,
Gary
-- Forwarded message --
From: Continuum@vmbuild
Date: Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 10:20 PM
Subject: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Commons - Commons VFS -
To: d...@commons.apache.org
Hi All,
We have Apache Commons components building on GitHub CI as
experimental builds with Java 24-ea but most fail because tooling like
JaCoCo and EasyMock don't support Java 24-ea (or 25-ea) yet.
HTH,
Gary
On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 10:16 AM David Delabassee
wrote:
>
> Welcome to the final Open
22 matches
Mail list logo
