Hi Jarek,
I'm about to head out for 3 weeks, so I'm going to miss most of this
discussion. I've done my best to leave comments in your document, but
just picking out one topic in this thread:
On 14/09/2020 02:40, Jarek Potiuk wrote:
Yeah - I see the point and to be honest, that was exactly m
Oh yeah. I start realizing now how herculean it is :). No worries, I am
afraid when you are back, the discussion will be just warming up :).
Speaking of the "double standard" - the main reason really comes from
licensing. When you compile something in that is GPL, your code starts to
be bound by t
On 14/09/2020 11:54, Jarek Potiuk wrote:
Oh yeah. I start realizing now how herculean it is :). No worries, I am
afraid when you are back, the discussion will be just warming up :).
Speaking of the "double standard" - the main reason really comes from
licensing. When you compile something in tha
>From a distribution standpoint, the point of these policies to me has
been to emphasize that anything we distribute here at Apache can be
safely used and copied under the terms of the Apache License. As such,
source releases have always been the target, though over time, Apache
has accumulated sev
Very true Matt.
I think this is really a crucial part of the proposal to define the
boundary between the Apache / Non-Apache artifacts (potentially with a
different, non-ASF compliant license).
The "compiled" vs. "packaged" that I proposed is one way of looking
at it, rather simple and straightf
Joan,
I read your comment and I have a kind request - hopefully you are not yet
out - you mentioned in the comment Open Office and artifacts that would not
fall into the criteria proposed. Could you please point us to one or two
examples of such artifacts and someone that could carry the discussio
Hi Jarek,
I’ve yet to read your Cwiki, but I am on the OpenOffice PMC.
(1) If you wish to discuss our build processes for Centos, WIndows, and macOS
please email d...@openoffice.apache.org. We are working towards our 4.1.8
release for the 20th Anniversary of Openoffice.org.
(2) If you wish to
Hi Jarek,
I’m sure that you have reviewed https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
I think that you might want to focus on Class B licenses in these discussions.
It might help you to keep in a more limited scope and determine how to make
compliant Helm Charts.
The legal committee and VP are
Yep. I have maybe not intimate knowledge of all the licensing details but I
am really interested in licenses in general and I am rather familiar with
the doc (I put it also as reference in my proposal). I literally wanted the
proposal to use everything that is already there and come up with an
abso
