[jira] [Moved] (BUILDS-108) Problem with ServiceMix-Bundles Jenkins job

2015-08-19 Thread Gavin (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDS-108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gavin moved INFRA-10142 to BUILDS-108: -- INFRA-Members: (was: [infrastructure-team]) Workflow: jira (was: INFRA Workf

[jira] [Commented] (BUILDS-85) Could not generate DH keypair / peer not authenticated

2015-08-19 Thread Dennis Lundberg (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDS-85?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14702810#comment-14702810 ] Dennis Lundberg commented on BUILDS-85: --- Thanks for the feedback [~pctony]. I underst

[jira] [Commented] (BUILDS-88) Unable to deploy snapshot artifacts from Streams Master

2015-08-19 Thread Steve Blackmon (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDS-88?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14703699#comment-14703699 ] Steve Blackmon commented on BUILDS-88: -- I can't deploy snapshots using my personal cre

Alert: continuum-ci.apache.org is down!

2015-08-19 Thread no-reply
Hello, Our monitoring system has detected that continuum-ci.apache.org (https) is down: Socket timeout after 30 seconds With regards, Apache Infrastructure. To unsubscribe from this specific alert, please go to: http://status.apache.org/pubsub/manage.cgi?unsub=171&token=1e7d9422d001139f29bc8c531

Recovery: continuum-ci.apache.org is back again!

2015-08-19 Thread no-reply
Hello, Our monitoring system has detected that continuum-ci.apache.org (https) is working again, ain't that great?! With regards, Apache Infrastructure To unsubscribe from this specific alert, please go to: http://status.apache.org/pubsub/manage.cgi?unsub=171&token=1e7d9422d001139f29bc8c5314f3f7

[jira] [Created] (BUILDS-109) OOME: can't create native thread

2015-08-19 Thread stack (JIRA)
stack created BUILDS-109: Summary: OOME: can't create native thread Key: BUILDS-109 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDS-109 Project: Infra Build Platform Issue Type: Bug Rep

[jira] [Commented] (BUILDS-109) OOME: can't create native thread

2015-08-19 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDS-109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14704078#comment-14704078 ] stack commented on BUILDS-109: -- Here is an example: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-

[jira] [Resolved] (BUILDS-109) OOME: can't create native thread

2015-08-19 Thread Andrew Bayer (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDS-109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Bayer resolved BUILDS-109. - Resolution: Duplicate > OOME: can't create native thread > > >

Re: Build slave capacity on builds.apache.org

2015-08-19 Thread David Nalley
Andrew: I know Jenkins tracks how big the queue is, is that something that we can graph over time? It'd be interesting to know how that's changed and will change, otherwise we'll constantly be fighting fires here. I'd like to have the following items graphed: # of dynamic slaves in operation # o

Re: Build slave capacity on builds.apache.org

2015-08-19 Thread David Nalley
So, just spot checking some of the dynamic build slaves - historically those have spun up a few hours at a time, to give us additional capacity when our queue spiked - but it looks like the slaves are staying online pretty much all of the time. Right now we are configured to have 12 slaves. Assumin

Re: Name resolution issue on ubuntu jenkins slaves?

2015-08-19 Thread David Nalley
Whatever we are using for DNS on those build slaves is redirecting any NXDOMAIN to a Level3 search domain. Is this happening on the ubuntu-* slaves or on the dynamic build slaves? --David On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Keith W wrote: > Hello Apache builds, > > We (Apache Qpid) have been seein

Re: Build slave capacity on builds.apache.org

2015-08-19 Thread Daan Hoogland
cloudstack...! we started making more intensive use of pull-builders. the old pull-request build job is replaced by a rat and an analysis job. Maybe others have done so as well but I am sure we (ACS) are a culprit in this. On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 4:28 AM, David Nalley wrote: > So, just spot chec