On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 3:13 PM, ant elder wrote:
>> As others have already commented the Hudson archiving phase seems to
>> be really slow, eg Tuscany creates a couple of "all" distributions
>> that are around 80meg and these take s
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 9:51 AM, ant elder wrote:
> After some searching I came across [1] that tells about an option
> added not so long ago for "Disable automatic artifact archiving", its
> in the Advanced part of the Build section of the Hudson config.
Excellent find! I'll try it out on some o
Sometimes it seems to take ages to get a job run on Hudson, right now
there are 35 jobs queue up waiting to run but the available executors
is showing a lot of idle ones. Why can't those idle ones be used, are
those idle ones usable or not or only for special things?
The current idle ones are:
Bu
> > After some searching I came across [1] that tells about an option
> > added not so long ago for "Disable automatic artifact archiving", its
> > in the Advanced part of the Build section of the Hudson config.
>
> Excellent find! I'll try it out on some of my builds and investigate if we
can
> s
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 9:51 AM, ant elder wrote:
> I'm not sure what the implications are for not
> archiving, does any one know more about it?
Seems like repository deploy will run from the archived artifacts:
https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Tuscany-2x/972/console
/niklas
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 12:48 PM, ant elder wrote:
> Why can't those idle ones be used, are
> those idle ones usable or not or only for special things?
The Hadoop and Lucene slaves are for those projects only. solaris2
should be for all jobs, I've changed the configuration for that. As
for freebs
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Niklas Gustavsson
wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 9:51 AM, ant elder wrote:
>> I'm not sure what the implications are for not
>> archiving, does any one know more about it?
>
> Seems like repository deploy will run from the archived artifacts:
> https://hudson.a
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Niklas Gustavsson
wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 12:48 PM, ant elder wrote:
>> Why can't those idle ones be used, are
>> those idle ones usable or not or only for special things?
>
> The Hadoop and Lucene slaves are for those projects only. solaris2
> should be
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 1:35 PM, ant elder wrote:
> Out of interest, how does a project go about getting its own private
> slave like Hadoop and Lucene have? Presumably it requires funding or
> someone donating some machine or resources? If i could find someone
> willing to do that for Tuscany cou
I cannot do anything: The filesystem is shared with other freebsd slaves, so we
have to wait for somebody from infra to clean it up:
[uschind...@lucene ~]$ df -h
Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
zroot/jails/lucene.zones.apache.org 16G 16G
10 matches
Mail list logo