On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> This is an aspect of infra that has me a bit confused. I earned my
> committer statuses on projects by blackmail posting
> patches. At infra, the only patching op I've seen is doc. Should I
> look for opportunities to just help on hudson w
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 7:36 AM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>> Are you interested in another Hudson admin? I brought up hudson here
>> at the day job, and have made a few commits to Hudson myself.
>
> Yes, we're always interested in more
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Are you interested in another Hudson admin? I brought up hudson here
> at the day job, and have made a few commits to Hudson myself.
Yes, we're always interested in more Hudson admins. The way it works
is like for committership, so hang a
Niklas,
Are you interested in another Hudson admin? I brought up hudson here
at the day job, and have made a few commits to Hudson myself.
Meanwhile, I'm not sure that lack of 3.0 support explains anything,
since using the seemingly supported 3.0 beta I got the same error.
For a freestyle stopga
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> Well, so, earlier this evening hudson showed my name as SYSTEM. I
> didn't think much of it. It showed me the system config department,
> and I added maven 3.0.
It's a bug in Hudson which has been reported to the Hudson devs (but
there d
Well, so, earlier this evening hudson showed my name as SYSTEM. I
didn't think much of it. It showed me the system config department,
and I added maven 3.0.
Now, it has changed my mind, and sees that I am bimargulies, and no
longer shows me the system config department.
Net result is that the mav
