On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
> could we use check_http and use the main ASF monitoring nagios[1] for
> the rest of infra can easily see it?
Yes, that was my plan (sorry for not making it more clear). We
actually had the machine (check_ping I believe) in there at one time.
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Niklas Gustavsson
>> wrote:
>>> Would it be okay to install the Slave status
>>> (http://wiki.hudson-ci.org/display/HUDSON/slave-status) in Hudso
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Niklas Gustavsson
> wrote:
>> Would it be okay to install the Slave status
>> (http://wiki.hudson-ci.org/display/HUDSON/slave-status) in Hudson?
>> That way, slaves would be possible to monitor from Nagios.
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
> Hi
>
> Would it be okay to install the Slave status
> (http://wiki.hudson-ci.org/display/HUDSON/slave-status) in Hudson?
> That way, slaves would be possible to monitor from Nagios. I'm seeing
> some crashes of Hudson on the Windows slav
+1
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 21:08, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
> Hi
>
> Would it be okay to install the Slave status
> (http://wiki.hudson-ci.org/display/HUDSON/slave-status) in Hudson?
> That way, slaves would be possible to monitor from Nagios. I'm seeing
> some crashes of Hudson on the Windows sl
Hi
Would it be okay to install the Slave status
(http://wiki.hudson-ci.org/display/HUDSON/slave-status) in Hudson?
That way, slaves would be possible to monitor from Nagios. I'm seeing
some crashes of Hudson on the Windows slave, and would like to be
notified when this happens.
/niklas
