Re: Running hudson or something like it on changes before they are committed

2010-09-27 Thread Benson Margulies
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 9:15 PM, Jesse Glick wrote: > On 09/27/2010 08:33 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: >> >> It seems that he does indeed want a pre-commit builder. > > FYI: > > http://wiki.hudson-ci.org/display/HUDSON/Designing+pre-tested+commit Yes, I'm aware of this. A really comprensive version of

Re: Running hudson or something like it on changes before they are committed

2010-09-27 Thread Jesse Glick
On 09/27/2010 08:33 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: It seems that he does indeed want a pre-commit builder. FYI: http://wiki.hudson-ci.org/display/HUDSON/Designing+pre-tested+commit There does not seem to be any broad consensus on what such a feature should look like, at least if implemented within Hu

Re: Running hudson or something like it on changes before they are committed

2010-09-27 Thread Benson Margulies
ge- >> > From: Benson Margulies [mailto:bimargul...@gmail.com] >> > Sent: Tuesday, 28 September 2010 8:59 AM >> > To: in...@apache.org >> > Subject: Running hudson or something like it on changes before they are >> > committed >> > >> >

Re: Running hudson or something like it on changes before they are committed

2010-09-27 Thread Ted Dunning
gulies [mailto:bimargul...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, 28 September 2010 8:59 AM > > To: in...@apache.org > > Subject: Running hudson or something like it on changes before they are > > committed > > > > A full test run of Apache CXF on even a moderately powerfu