On 11/29/2010 01:07 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Sim IJskes - QCG wrote:
Could we have a River-QA lock? Only 1 of our QA jobs should run at the same
time. Some have to be handstarted, and they should not interfere with each
other when accidentally started with
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Sim IJskes - QCG wrote:
> Could we have a River-QA lock? Only 1 of our QA jobs should run at the same
> time. Some have to be handstarted, and they should not interfere with each
> other when accidentally started with the automatic one.
Done, named
Hello,
Could we have a River-QA lock? Only 1 of our QA jobs should run at the
same time. Some have to be handstarted, and they should not interfere
with each other when accidentally started with the automatic one.
Gr. Sim