> On 20 Aug 2015, at 10:28 am, Uwe Schindler wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The backlog of Lucene is generally large. That's wanted,
No problem, thanks for letting me know, I’ll take that into account in the
future.
> because we don't trigger builds based on commits; just to always have one
> build of
Hi,
The backlog of Lucene is generally large. That's wanted, because we don't
trigger builds based on commits; just to always have one build of everything in
the queue we do it time-based. Because of our pseudorandomized test
infrastructure, the build slave should never be out of work because e
> On 20 Aug 2015, at 9:17 am, Uwe Schindler wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> could someone please change back the number of "build processors" for the
> "lucene" Jenkins node to 1? Currently it executes always 2 Jobs in parallel.
> The underlying server only has 4 cpu cores and the Lucene Job configuration
Hi,
could someone please change back the number of "build processors" for the
"lucene" Jenkins node to 1? Currently it executes always 2 Jobs in parallel.
The underlying server only has 4 cpu cores and the Lucene Job configuration is
done in a way that it uses all available CPU nodes, so runnin
