Re: I'm as blind as a bat (Re: Maven "latest" ain't the latest anymore)

2013-08-02 Thread Glen Mazza
Either way, the definition of "Maven (latest)" is wrong, because if "Maven (latest)" meant the latest Maven 1 (as we already have Maven 2 (latest) and Maven 3 (latest)) it's using Maven 2.x (incorrect), and if "Maven (latest)" meant the latest Maven loaded (3.1), it's still incorrectly using 2.

Re: I'm as blind as a bat (Re: Maven "latest" ain't the latest anymore)

2013-07-31 Thread Marshall Schor
Following the "principle of least surprise", I would have expected that "Maven (latest)" without any suffix of 1, 2 or 3, would mean the same as the lastest Maven, which is Maven 3.0.5 at the moment. Perhaps this can be fixed? -Marshall On 7/31/2013 6:53 AM, Glen Mazza wrote: > Sorry, I didn't r

I'm as blind as a bat (Re: Maven "latest" ain't the latest anymore)

2013-07-31 Thread Glen Mazza
Sorry, I didn't realize Maven latest meant Maven 1 latest, there's Maven 2 (latest) and Maven (3) latest, and there's even Maven 3.0.5. Never mind. :) Glen On 07/31/2013 06:51 AM, Glen Mazza wrote: Hi, when I configure my Roller Maven builds and choose "Maven (latest)", i.e., a desire to see