On 11/02/10 12:30 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 13:24, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
will this break permalinks to existing projects and builds? e.g. from
mails, jira, wikis etc.
Yes. :-(
ugh. that'd be a dealbreaker for
ok, +1
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 13:58, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
> So links like
> http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/tapestry-5.1-freestyle/ will still
> work?
>
> +1 then.
>
> This will make finding things much easier.
>
> Uli
>
> On 10.02.2010 14:33 schrieb Jukka Zitting:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On We
So links like http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/tapestry-5.1-freestyle/
will still work?
+1 then.
This will make finding things much easier.
Uli
On 10.02.2010 14:33 schrieb Jukka Zitting:
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Ju
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
>> will this break permalinks to existing projects and builds? e.g. from
>> mails, jira, wikis etc.
>
> Yes. :-(
Actually, it only breaks links to existing views. Links to individua
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 13:24, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
>> will this break permalinks to existing projects and builds? e.g. from
>> mails, jira, wikis etc.
>
> Yes. :-(
ugh. that'd be a dealbreaker for me. I wonder if we could just ki
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
> will this break permalinks to existing projects and builds? e.g. from
> mails, jira, wikis etc.
Yes. :-(
BR,
Jukka Zitting
will this break permalinks to existing projects and builds? e.g. from
mails, jira, wikis etc.
--j.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 13:13, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We currently have almost 50 project views in Hudson, which makes the
> main page and all those views horribly wide because of the spac
Hi,
We currently have almost 50 project views in Hudson, which makes the
main page and all those views horribly wide because of the space
required for all the view tabs. To avoid that problem I experimented a
bit with the nested view plugin [1] that allows grouping of views.
My idea is to split o