Re: Continuum appears to have stopped working

2010-02-09 Thread Wendy Smoak
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 7:12 PM, sebb wrote: > On 07/02/2010, sebb wrote: >> There appears to be no activity currently on Continuum. >>  Submitting a build appears to work, but nothing happens. >> >>  Seems to have been broken for a few days now. >> > > PING? Noted, but unfortunately I'm not able

Re: What is the host config for Continuum?

2010-01-12 Thread Wendy Smoak
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 5:04 PM, sebb wrote: > I tried triggering Commons DBCP twice just now. It was already in the > DEFAULT_BUILD_QUEUE, so I expected at least 1 other build to be added > at the end of the queue, but there is no sign of another entry. If the project is already queued to build,

Re: Welcome to the builds list!

2009-04-17 Thread Wendy Smoak
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:14 AM, Gavin wrote: > So, I'll go ahead with either ci.html as suggested, or I found > http://apache.org/dev/nightly-builds.html which I'm not sure what to do with > - re-use it as the landing page, bin it, leave it for some other use? nightly builds != continuous inte

Re: vmbuild vs ci.a.o (was Re: vmbuild scheduled downtime in ~12hrs)

2009-04-16 Thread Wendy Smoak
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:41 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > oh. I had the impression on the ci.apache.org server there are CI-servers > like continuum and hudson, etc. That's why I asked. > > So there is no continuum on ci.apache.org, or am I now totally wrong? Correct, Continuum lives on vmbu

Re: vmbuild vs ci.a.o (was Re: vmbuild scheduled downtime in ~12hrs)

2009-04-16 Thread Wendy Smoak
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 3:28 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > I have a question regarding the vmbuild. Since now we have the ci.a.o > "platform" > is the (long-term) goal to retire the vmbuild ? Nope. Continuum will be there as long as there are volunteers wiling to maintain it. So far, so go