Re: Build failed in Jenkins: River-trunk #485

Solaris2 is in trouble, nothing to do with our sources. Gr. Sim On 06-06-11 14:01, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: See -- Started by an SCM change Building remotely on solaris2 java.io.IOException: Fail

Re: windows1 broken

On 11/29/2010 03:54 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: Right, having 66 copies of the workspace on different machines sound less than optimal. Would it be possible to divide these categories in some other way in order to maintain one or a few workspaces? Wait, i havent told you everything. 66 workspa

Re: windows1 broken

On 11/29/2010 03:35 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: My thinking was, that only 1 workspace per machine would be created. That turns out not to be the case. :-( Could you describe what's the purpose of the "categories" defined in the build config? River has a normal build, and a QA framework. Thi

Re: windows1 broken

On 11/29/2010 03:02 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Sim IJskes - QCG wrote: That means river-qa has to scale down on its size. Not necessarily at this time. It will create 66 workspaces per machine. Are you sure? Can we get a custom workspace path on every

Re: windows1 broken

On 11/29/2010 02:47 PM, Sim IJskes - QCG wrote: the matrix project uses a separate workspace for every variant. Any ideas how to fix it? Can we get a custom workspace path on every machine (the same)? I'm merely asking for permission and advice. :-)

Re: windows1 broken

On 11/29/2010 02:43 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: The River QA takes as much space as all the other builds on that slave combined. That said, I've cleaned up some disc and restarted the slave so we should be fine for some time. That means river-qa has to scale down on its size. The problem is th

Re: River-QA lock

On 11/29/2010 01:07 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Sim IJskes - QCG wrote: Could we have a River-QA lock? Only 1 of our QA jobs should run at the same time. Some have to be handstarted, and they should not interfere with each other when accidentally started with

windows1 broken

I guess the river-qa job was the straw that broke the camels back: Cannot lock working copy 'C:\hudson\hudson-slave\workspace\River-QA\category\url\jdk\JDK 1.6 (latest)\label\Windows\qa\harness\configs\jeri\norm': There is not enough space on the disk

River-QA lock

Hello, Could we have a River-QA lock? Only 1 of our QA jobs should run at the same time. Some have to be handstarted, and they should not interfere with each other when accidentally started with the automatic one. Gr. Sim

Re: guidelines

On 25-11-10 09:52, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Sim IJskes - QCG wrote: Are there guidelines for the use of hudson? The best we got are http://wiki.apache.org/general/Hudson Use one of these locks for long running builds (> 1 hour): * Long-running jobs

guidelines

Are there guidelines for the use of hudson? I felt rather anti-social with the river QA jobs and have resorted to only start them by hand. But from the looks of the pileup right now, my attempts at preventing a one were in vain. (At least they are not caused by me). I much rather have the Q

Re: [Hudson] Restarting Hudson master

On 25-11-10 09:38, Gav... wrote: On 25-11-10 08:55, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: Our Hudson master is not feeling all that well, so I will be restarting it now. I cant login anymore. Is that intentional? Double Whammy, our ldap server went down too. Try again. Gav... Logged out, and in again

Re: [Hudson] Restarting Hudson master

On 25-11-10 09:08, Sim IJskes - QCG wrote: On 25-11-10 08:55, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: Our Hudson master is not feeling all that well, so I will be restarting it now. I cant login anymore. Is that intentional? Works! -- QCG, Software voor het MKB, 071-5890970, http://www.qcg.nl Quality

Re: [Hudson] Restarting Hudson master

On 25-11-10 08:55, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: Our Hudson master is not feeling all that well, so I will be restarting it now. I cant login anymore. Is that intentional? Gr. Sim -- QCG, Software voor het MKB, 071-5890970, http://www.qcg.nl Quality Consultancy Group b.v., Leiderdorp, Kvk Den Haag

Re: [hudson] archive phase problems

On 23-11-10 14:01, Gav... wrote: Here is another unrelated example I was talking about. https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Ant_BuildFromPOMs/buildTimeTrend So, more than doubled in the last 3 days compared with other build times. Note as I mentioned before, this is not tied to just one machi

Re: [hudson] archive phase problems

On 11/23/2010 01:25 PM, Sim IJskes - QCG wrote: Looks like a totally saturated disk subsystem (to me, from a distance). Is there sar data from that machine? When you have a jobs that prints a timestamp just before the archive stage, you can correlate this with the sar data. You just have to

Re: [hudson] archive phase problems

On 11/23/2010 01:15 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 12:03 PM, sebb wrote: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/JMeter-trunk/1182/console Build Total time: 3 minutes 40 seconds Overall Took 30 min on solaris1 Yes, this has been reported before but I was unable to find the

Re: Build failed in Hudson: River-trunk-QA #66

On 11/22/2010 08:37 AM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 1:35 AM, Gav... wrote: Is it possible to get an extra jdk on the freebsd1 instance in the line of the suggestions of Zsolt? installed in /usr/local/diablo-jdk16/ (though the other is still default) jdk1.6.0_07-64 is n

Re: Build failed in Hudson: River-trunk-QA #66

Great! I've started our freebsd job immediately. Gr. Sim On 11/22/2010 01:35 AM, Gav... wrote: -Original Message- From: Sim IJskes - QCG [mailto:s...@qcg.nl] Sent: Sunday, 21 November 2010 10:11 PM To: builds@apache.org Cc: river-...@incubator.apache.org Subject: Fwd: Re:

Fwd: Re: Build failed in Hudson: River-trunk-QA #66

Zsolt made the following remarks about our (failing) qa-build on freebsd. Is it possible to get an extra jdk on the freebsd1 instance in the line of the suggestions of Zsolt? Gr. Sim Original Message Subject: Re: Build failed in Hudson: River-trunk-QA #66 Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2

Re: strange effect

On 19-11-10 14:14, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Sim IJskes - QCG wrote: From the console: [javadoc] Loading source files for package com.sun.jini.test.spec.url.https.integrity... [javadoc] Loading source files for package com.sun.jini.test.spec.url.util

strange effect

From the console: [javadoc] Loading source files for package com.sun.jini.test.spec.url.https.integrity... [javadoc] Loading source files for package com.sun.jini.test.spec.url.util... [javadoc] Loading source files for package com.sun.jini.test.support... [javadoc] Constructing Javadoc infor

Re: windows1

On 18-11-10 11:55, Sim IJskes - QCG wrote: Windows1 is 16 hrs behind, is this something to worry about? does it influence svn operations? Well, maybe i've broken windows1. During river-trunk-qa-windows it disappeared. Oops. Gr. Sim -- QCG, Software voor het MKB, 071-5890970,

windows1

Hello, Windows1 is 16 hrs behind, is this something to worry about? does it influence svn operations? Gr. Sim -- QCG, Software voor het MKB, 071-5890970, http://www.qcg.nl Quality Consultancy Group b.v., Leiderdorp, Kvk Den Haag: 28088397

Re: solaris2

On 17-11-10 20:36, Sim IJskes - QCG wrote: I can't find the reason why River-trunk does not ever start on solaris2. Is it something we configured? But i don't want to fix it only on solaris2. Any jdk would be nice. Does solaris2 only get jobs which are explicitly assigned? Gr. S

solaris2

Hello builders, I can't find the reason why River-trunk does not ever start on solaris2. Is it something we configured? Gr. Sim

Re: vm versions hudson

On 11/15/2010 03:42 PM, Sim IJskes - QCG wrote: Hello builders, i've noticed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2661 is a bit stuck. Can i do something to make it easier to complete? Gr. Sim I've noticed the jdk on solaris1 has been updated to _22. Thanks! Gr. Sim

vm versions hudson

Hello builders, i've noticed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2661 is a bit stuck. Can i do something to make it easier to complete? Gr. Sim

process hanging on ubuntu1

Hello, Could you have a look if we've left a process hanging on ubuntu1? (It's from the River-trunk-QA build) Could you kill it for us? I tried logging on to minerva, but i've no permission to login. Gr. Sim