Hey Priotr,
Have you tried filing an issue in jira [1]?
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/INFRA/
On 2019-01-21 13:34, Piotr Zarzycki wrote:
Hi Guys,
Should we write to other list to get some answers on that ? It's been
almost two weeks.
Thanks,
Piotr
czw., 10 sty 2019 o 00:47 Alex
a 100% success rate so far ...
--
Dominik Psenner
On Sat, Jan 12, 2019, 16:58 Allen Wittenauer
>
> > On Jan 11, 2019, at 11:23 PM, Dominik Psenner
> wrote:
> >
> > I can enlist another pain point I faced while implementing the pipeline
> for
> > log4net. I had t
posed of anyway, either on build success or failure or timeout. Since
then I recommend to wrap builds into virtualbox machines. That works very
well with gitlab-ce.
--
Dominik Psenner
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019, 18:47 Allen Wittenauer
>
> > On Jan 10, 2019, at 11:28 PM, Stephen Connolly <
>
I read through both issues and wonder whether you could start the three
instances on the same machine? To me, the fact that they communicate
with each other via tcp://localhost is just an implementation detail.
On 2019-01-07 22:59, Vincent S Hou wrote:
Can anyone from the infra team help me to
On 2019-01-10 11:49, Stephen Connolly wrote:
That would meen, though, that the PMC would need to re-encrypt the file
every time the PMC changes or any time a PMC member loses their GPG key
Note to self: e.g. see
http://laurent.bachelier.name/2013/03/gpg-encryption-to-multiple-recipients/
for exa
On 2019-01-10 11:24, Alex Harui wrote:
Stephen are you saying that we can't trust ASF Members? That we have to fear
that at least one ASF member will not be able to resist the urge to leverage
the RoyalePMC account for evil?
I'm sure we can find some other way to distribute credentials if that
On 2019-01-10 11:11, stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, but they may not be the people the board has tasked with ensuring that all
released source code has been +1'd by at least three PMC members.
A working solution could be that during a release, a release-vote branch
is maintained
On 2019-01-07 08:51, Alex Harui wrote:
The workflow I envision is this:
1. RM runs Jenkins job on builds@ to create release branch, generate artifacts
, tag the repo, push artifacts to Nexus staging and dist.a.o/dev/Royale
2. RM downloads artifacts to verify them, adds PGP signature and calls
On Sun, Jan 6, 2019, 19:52 Allen Wittenauer
>
> > On Jan 6, 2019, at 10:43 AM, Dominik Psenner wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 6, 2019, 19:32 Allen Wittenauer
> > >
> >>
> >> a) The ASF has been running untrusted code since before Github existed.
>
eded disposable environments (what Stephen Connolly called
> throwaway hardware and is similar to what Dominik Psenner talked about wrt
> gitlab runners) for a while. When INFRA enabled multiple executors per
> node (which they did for good reasons), it triggered an avalanche of
> pr
following criteria:
Disk usage
Build time
Disk usage overhead during build
Admistrative tasks
Upgrades to vbox build machines
Upgrades to the physical build machine
Note that we do not only build on linux, but also windows machines. Some
can be considered ancient.
--
Dominik Psenner
On Sun, Jan 6, 2019
he.org/job/logging-log4net/job/develop/75/console
--
Dominik Psenner
to mitigate these kind of problems. Namely caching, local mirrors, ..
Am Mi., 25. Juli 2018 um 22:02 Uhr schrieb Dominik Psenner <
dpsen...@gmail.com>:
> Am So., 22. Juli 2018 um 00:42 Uhr schrieb Joan Touzet >:
>
>> Yes - you can do this in your own Jenkinsfile or job de
Am So., 22. Juli 2018 um 00:42 Uhr schrieb Joan Touzet :
> Yes - you can do this in your own Jenkinsfile or job description.
>
> In a Pipeline build (declarative or procedural), use deleteDir() :
>
> https://jenkins.io/doc/pipeline/steps/workflow-basic-steps/#-deletedir-%20recursively%20delete%20t
Great stuff! Is there a dockerd installed to provide a way to base build
environment on docker container like
https://store.docker.com/community/images/microsoft/dotnet-framework ?
On Tue, 24 Jul 2018, 21:30 Chris Thistlethwaite, wrote:
> Greetings all!
>
> Lots of Jenkins updates lately, so I'
Would there be ways to automate a rm -rf of a build workspace when the
build has completed? Doing so would make the problem disappear. Surely
builds take a little more time and disk, network and cpu usage will grow.
But builds start from a pristine workspace which is desirable from my pov
and the
Looks like triggering the pipeline manually somehow got it working. Seems
to be related to the fact that on the second run it uses the cached docker
image.
2018-05-19 20:22 GMT+02:00 Dominik Psenner :
> Hi,
>
> I observe more failures of the log4net pipeline, caused by an excepti
onsoleFull
.
Cheers
--
Dominik Psenner
Thanks Karl Heinz!
On 2018-05-14 08:38, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
Hi,
On 14/05/18 07:12, Dominik Psenner wrote:
Hey,
since yesterday I observe that windows-2012-2 does not work any more
and fails with a remoting related exception when a build is started.
Please see
https
could be? Did I introduce this issue with our
latest changes to the CI?
Cheers
--
Dominik Psenner
Hi,
while building log4net we see constantly one of the following errors
that appears to be related to H26. Is there anything I can do to resolve
this on my own?
First error:
Caused: java.io.IOException: Cannot run program "docker" (in directory
"/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/log4ne
nal Message -
> From: "Allen Wittenauer"
> To: builds@apache.org
> Sent: Monday, 30 October, 2017 1:58:18 PM
> Subject: Re: Jenkins slave able to build BED & RPM
>
>
> > On Oct 30, 2017, at 4:33 AM, Dominik Psenner wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 2
ted operating system. Jenkins makes the development
of such build pipelines rather easy.
Best.
On 2017-10-30 10:27, Dominik Psenner wrote:
Hi Thomas,
RPM is a red hat package manager package and in my eyes it is a bad idea
to install such packages on a debian flavored distribution.
There se
Hi Thomas,
RPM is a red hat package manager package and in my eyes it is a bad idea
to install such packages on a debian flavored distribution.
There seems to be no red hat flavored linux distribution (fedora,
centos, rhel, mandriva, ..) in the row of build slaves, probably because
you are t
On 2017-09-27 23:26, Meghna Baijal wrote:
Thanks Dominik! I looked at Log4net’s Jenkinsfile and it is going to be a good
reference for me in the future.
I am currently adding some features via the Jenkinsfile script and I am hoping
they will work as expected on Apache Jenkins :)
Thanks for the
Log4net builds with a github multitrigger pipeline. However it doesnt add
comments or uses user whitelisting. It would be nice if some pull request
sources could be trusted such that changes to the Jenkinsfile are not
discarded.
On 25 Sep 2017 11:32 p.m., "Meghna Baijal"
wrote:
Hi All,
I am also
e:
Cannot contact ubuntu-eu2: java.lang.InterruptedException
2017-08-19 20:19 GMT+02:00 Dominik Psenner :
> This is a short catch up of three different symptoms I've seen in the past
> few hours. I really wonder what's going on here and share the information
> in case someone ca
at hudson.model.Executor.run(Executor.java:405)
2017-08-19 13:33 GMT+02:00 Dominik Psenner :
> Hi,
>
> we observe that builds of the logging-log4net job [1] do not complete,
> even though they apparently ran through all stages. At the time of writing
> three hours have passed so
/develop/
--
Dominik Psenner
/Openmeetings%203.3.x/configure
> >> [2] https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/OpenMeetings/job
> >> /Openmeetings%203.3.x/100/
> >>
> >> --
> >> WBR
> >> Maxim aka solomax
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > WBR
> > Maxim aka solomax
> >
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
--
Dominik Psenner
> > >>> https://builds.apache.org/job/kafka-trunk-jdk7/
> > lastCompletedBuild/console
> > >>>
> > >>> Ismael
> > >>>
> > >>> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Chris Lambertus
> > wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Jenkins will be restarted at midnight tonight UTC to address
> problems
> > >>>> related to ‘too many open files’ and to attempt to correct a problem
> > with
> > >>>> some windows agents. I will be stopping new builds so that the queue
> > can
> > >>>> empty over the next 2 hours.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> -Chris
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >
> >
> >
>
--
Dominik Psenner
31 matches
Mail list logo
