We use Travis-CI for a couple non-x86 builds. They seem reasonably
stable these days, though it took some time to bring them to that state
because of apparently very limited execution resources, leading to
timeouts or crashes (especially on s390x).
https://app.travis-ci.com/github/apache/ar
Le 26/08/2022 à 13:21, Lari Hotari a écrit :
I created a INFRA ticket requesting the usage report for GitHub Actions:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-23633
This information should be available at
https://github.com/organizations/apache/settings/billing for those who have
access.
Hi Marton,
Thanks a lot for the information you have collected and presented. This
is very insightful!
Le 18/04/2021 à 11:06, Elek, Marton a écrit :
There are signs of mis-configuation of some jobs. For example in some
projects I found many failure jobs with >15 hours executions even if t
I am a member of the Arrow PMC ( ;-) ) and we would gladly welcome a way
to contribute - e.g. financially - towards larger CI resources on Github
Actions (or another similar online service that can build PRs from forks).
While "build more with fewer minutes" is definitely desirable, the
bre
Le 09/03/2021 à 09:33, Tristan Van Berkom a écrit :
So with that said, I would like to ask the community some questions:
o What is the correct way of approaching pre-merge CI for ASF github
projects ?
If you have "the answer" to this, please provide it and disregard
the entire
Le 09/02/2021 à 19:28, Jarek Potiuk a écrit :
> Yes. I noticed this misleading line and I will update the docs shortly. It
> should be Cancels duplicate runs from all running workflow *runs of the
> workflow the action acts on*."""
>
> The action is written in the way that it always acts on
Hi Jarek,
Le 09/02/2021 à 09:21, Jarek Potiuk a écrit :
> And we all together try to help each other (for
> example I helped yesterday the Pulsar team to implement most aggressive way
> of cancelling their workflows https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/9503
> (you can find pretty good explanati
Hi Jarek,
Thank you for the document. Could you tell us more about the "custom
security layer" that you implemented?
Regards
Antoine.
Le 08/02/2021 à 01:44, Jarek Potiuk a écrit :
> For anyone following this thread - some update from the progress we have in
> Airflow on building self-hosted
Le 09/01/2021 à 12:01, Jarek Potiuk a écrit :
>
> So if only we had 'approved', "secure" and easy way of running our own
> self-hosted runners + a way from Github to distribute the free resources in
> a fair way among the project. - the problem would be immediately solved.
> This is really what
Le 08/01/2021 à 22:29, P. Ottlinger a écrit :
> Hi Antoine,
>
> Am 08.01.21 um 22:17 schrieb Antoine Pitrou:
>>> What are the gaps in the ASF CI systems that are pushing people onto
>> less viable platforms such as GA?
>>
>> While being a PMC and core deve
Hi,
On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 12:49:03 -0800
Chris Lambertus wrote:
>
> Have you considered the internal and fully supported ASF Jenkins
and/or Buildbot infrastructure? Infra has little control over the free
open source offerings, but we have significantly more resources we can
bring to bear on own on
On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 14:00:17 +0200
Jarek Potiuk
wrote:
>
> Who else is using GitHub Actions extensively?
At Apache Arrow we are using GHA quite intensively as well. We have
tens of different builds, which are triggered based on which files were
modified. Some of them can be rather long.
12 matches
Mail list logo
