Re: Maven 2.2.1 vs. 3 confusion

Thanks! Problem found and fixed. However, it will require removing the 3.0.2 JARs from ubuntu1 and ubuntu2 and I'm waiting for some builds to finish before I can do that. /niklas On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Andreas Veithen wrote: > Here is an example: > > https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job

Re: Maven 2.2.1 vs. 3 confusion

Here is an example: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/ws-axiom-trunk/ I just noticed the following message in the log output of the job, which gives a hint about the root cause of the issue: Found mavenVersion 3.0.2 from file jar:file:/home/hudson/tools/maven/apache-maven-2.2.1/lib/maven-core

Re: Maven 2.2.1 vs. 3 confusion

On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Andreas Veithen wrote: > We have a couple of Hudson builds that are configured with Maven > 2.2.1, but they are actually executed with Maven 3. Can somebody > please fix the Hudson config? Could you provide an example of an affected job? /niklas

Re: Maven 2.2.1 vs. 3 confusion

Go to : https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/${YOURJOB}/configure There is a list box in the build configuration to choose the used maven version. 2011/2/1 Andreas Veithen > Hi, > > We have a couple of Hudson builds that are config

Maven 2.2.1 vs. 3 confusion

Hi, We have a couple of Hudson builds that are configured with Maven 2.2.1, but they are actually executed with Maven 3. Can somebody please fix the Hudson config? Andreas

Re: Probs building on Windows slave (disk space???).

Hi Niklas, Any idea, then, why these jobs failed? Or failing that, any suggestions as to how I might be able to diagnose the issue myself? Thanks Dan On 01/02/2011 08:17, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Dan Haywood wrote: The problem seems to be the "install" phase,

Re: Hudson permissions

On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Andreas Andreou wrote: > I had created all the tapestry related builds at hudeon.apache.org > for a year now and all is well - but now we want some of the other > committers / PMC to be able to config them. The PMC chair can add them as Hudson job admins: http://w

Hudson permissions

I had created all the tapestry related builds at hudeon.apache.org for a year now and all is well - but now we want some of the other committers / PMC to be able to config them. How is that possible (they don't have problems logging in - they just aren't allowed to change the configuration) ? --

Re: Probs building on Windows slave (disk space???).

On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Dan Haywood wrote: > The problem seems to be the "install" phase, ie copying JARs into > ~/.m2/repository, which makes me wonder about disk space on the Windows > slave. There is plenty of space on the slave, 12 Gb free at the moment. /niklas