Re: [Continuum] What happened to the Commons Continuum builds?

2010-08-18 Thread Brett Porter
On 19/08/2010, at 12:33 AM, sebb wrote: > On 18 August 2010 15:25, Brett Porter wrote: >> Hi Sebb, >> >> Sorry about that - I thought I had followed up with Commons about >> reinstating the builds but it appears I didn't. >> >> The previous VM host, odin, was being retired. We opted to rebuil

Re: [Continuum] What happened to the Commons Continuum builds?

2010-08-18 Thread sebb
On 18 August 2010 15:25, Brett Porter wrote: > Hi Sebb, > > Sorry about that - I thought I had followed up with Commons about reinstating > the builds but it appears I didn't. > > The previous VM host, odin, was being retired. We opted to rebuild the server > and Continuum / Archiva instances fr

Re: [Continuum] What happened to the Commons Continuum builds?

2010-08-18 Thread Brett Porter
Hi Sebb, Sorry about that - I thought I had followed up with Commons about reinstating the builds but it appears I didn't. The previous VM host, odin, was being retired. We opted to rebuild the server and Continuum / Archiva instances from scratch. The old data is retained in a backup though,

Re: [Hudson] New Hudson - no longer have access to jobs

2010-08-18 Thread sebb
On 18 August 2010 14:48, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 2:15 PM, sebb wrote: >> However, I've had a look at the Hudson docs, and found the following >> >> http://wiki.hudson-ci.org/display/HUDSON/Batch+Task+Plugin >> >> Sorry, I'd misremembered the name - they were called "tas

[Continuum] What happened to the Commons Continuum builds?

2010-08-18 Thread sebb
Most of the builds seem to have disappeared from the Continuum instance at http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/groupSummary.action I'm sure Commons used to have builds there until fairly recently. The last message I can trace is dated 31st July 2010. Any idea what has happened?

Re: [Hudson] New Hudson - no longer have access to jobs

2010-08-18 Thread Niklas Gustavsson
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 2:15 PM, sebb wrote: > However, I've had a look at the Hudson docs, and found the following > > http://wiki.hudson-ci.org/display/HUDSON/Batch+Task+Plugin > > Sorry, I'd misremembered the name - they were called "tasks" not "jobs". > > Looks like that plugin has not been br

Re: [Hudson] New Hudson - no longer have access to jobs

2010-08-18 Thread sebb
On 18 August 2010 12:58, Gav... wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, 18 August 2010 9:49 PM >> To: builds@apache.org >> Subject: Re: [Hudson] New Hudson - no longer have access to jobs >> >> On 18 August 2010 09:02, Niklas Gustavsson

RE: [Hudson] New Hudson - no longer have access to jobs

2010-08-18 Thread Gav...
> -Original Message- > From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, 18 August 2010 9:49 PM > To: builds@apache.org > Subject: Re: [Hudson] New Hudson - no longer have access to jobs > > On 18 August 2010 09:02, Niklas Gustavsson > wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 4:56 PM, s

Re: [Hudson] New Hudson - no longer have access to jobs

2010-08-18 Thread Niklas Gustavsson
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 1:49 PM, sebb wrote: >> Are they now completely gone or can you point to >> somewhere in our installation where I can have a look? > > They seem to be completely gone. Wierd. All plugins (except for the disk usage) from the old installation are active on the new master. If

Re: [Hudson] New Hudson - no longer have access to jobs

2010-08-18 Thread sebb
On 18 August 2010 09:02, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 4:56 PM, sebb wrote: >> Previously Hudson used to support the notion of "jobs" - small scripts >> that could be used to fix minor problems in the work area etc. >> JMeter used to have one which could be used to reset its

Re: [Hudson] New Hudson - no longer have access to jobs

2010-08-18 Thread Niklas Gustavsson
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 4:56 PM, sebb wrote: > Previously Hudson used to support the notion of "jobs" - small scripts > that could be used to fix minor problems in the work area etc. > JMeter used to have one which could be used to reset its Version,java > file (which otherwise tends to get mangle

Re: [Hudson] Problem with jobs tied to slave names

2010-08-18 Thread Niklas Gustavsson
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 4:48 AM, Andreas Andreou wrote: > Is it possible to add an extra label to the "vesta.apache.org (Ubuntu)" slave? > Somthing like vesta would be fine... Otherwise, there's no way to target > that specific slave Please see my earlier proposal to rename the slaves, in the cas