On Tue, 20 Aug 2024 10:07:26 GMT, Roman Kennke wrote:
> This is the main body of the JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental).
>
> Main changes:
> - Introduction of the (experimental) flag UseCompactObjectHeaders. All
> changes in this PR are protected by this flag. The purpose of the fl
On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 10:57:24 GMT, Roman Kennke wrote:
>> This is the main body of the JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental).
>>
>> It is also a follow-up to #20640, which now also includes (and supersedes)
>> #20603 and #20605, plus the Tiny Class-Pointers parts that have been
>> prev
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 17:42:24 GMT, Roman Kennke wrote:
>> Could you please cherry pick
>> https://github.com/mur47x111/jdk/commit/c45ebc2a89d0b25a3dd8cc46386e37a635ff9af2
>> for the JVMCI support?
>
> @mur47x111 it's now intergrated in jdk24. do your magic in Graal ;-)
@rkennke It is in the merg
On Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:22:51 GMT, Stefan Karlsson wrote:
>> We haven't decided whether or not we will git rid of
>> ```Klass::_prototype_header``` before intergrating this PR, or not. @stefank
>> could point you to a WIP branch, if that's helpful.
>
> This is my current work-in-progress code:
>
On Tue, 17 Sep 2024 12:52:03 GMT, Roman Kennke wrote:
>> This is the main body of the JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental).
>>
>> It is also a follow-up to #20640, which now also includes (and supersedes)
>> #20603 and #20605, plus the Tiny Class-Pointers parts that have been
>> prev
On Thu, 19 Sep 2024 05:03:42 GMT, Stefan Karlsson wrote:
>> Yes, I saw that patch. I'm not sure I like the idea of cpu dependent code
>> also doing the encoding. There were some C2 changes related to it that I
>> didn't understand if that scheme required them. I don't see the down side
>> t
On Fri, 2 May 2025 19:44:31 GMT, Vicente Romero wrote:
>> This PR is defining a new internal annotation,
>> `@jdk.internal.RequiresIdentity`, with target types PARAMETER and
>> TYPE_PARAMETER. The @RequiresIdentity annotation expresses the expectation
>> that an argument to a given method or c
On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 14:32:24 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> Aleksey Shipilev has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Rename -static job to -static-libs
>
> The point about difference between `static-libs` and `static` JDK is val
On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:15:13 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> Noticed this when reviewing
> [JDK-8349399](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8349399), which had to
> kludgy workaround the hunk introduced by `static-libs-bundles` addition
> ([JDK-8337265](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8337
On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 16:59:44 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> Noticed this when reviewing
>> [JDK-8349399](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8349399), which had to
>> kludgy workaround the hunk introduced by `static-libs-bundles` addition
>> ([JDK-8337265](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-
10 matches
Mail list logo
