On Wed, 16 Jul 2025 06:03:28 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Debatable. It's obviously going to scale any results somewhat based on the
>> size of the resources and number of classes. It's kind nice to see "this
>> change removes at least N micro/milli seconds of time spent" since that's a
>> mini
On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 12:27:40 GMT, David Beaumont wrote:
> Initial benchmark to capture at least some comparative measures of
> ImageReader performance.
>
> Current results on my laptop:
>
> Benchmark Mode Cnt Score
Added jimage and jrtfs exports.
-
Commit messages:
- Hacking build file for benchmark
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26035/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=26035&range=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8361013
Stats: 2 lines in 1 fi
On Tue, 1 Jul 2025 07:25:35 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> David Beaumont has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Some tidying up relating to the state objects.
>
> test/micro/org/op
3.752 ± 6.873
> ms/op
>
> The upcoming changes to ImageReader should show significant improvements to
> these results.
David Beaumont has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
Adding comment about maintainability.
---
On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 22:19:18 GMT, David Beaumont wrote:
> Added jimage and jrtfs exports.
This pull request has been closed without being integrated.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26035
On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 22:19:18 GMT, David Beaumont wrote:
> Added jimage and jrtfs exports.
Will add with the benchmark.
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26035#issuecomment-3018765679
Initial benchmark to capture at least some comparative measures of ImageReader
performance.
Current results on my laptop:
Benchmark Mode Cnt ScoreError
Units
NewImageBenchmark.warmCache_CountAllNodes avgt5 0.785 ± 0.140
ms/op
NewI
On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 12:27:40 GMT, David Beaumont wrote:
> Initial benchmark to capture at least some comparative measures of
> ImageReader performance.
>
> Current results on my laptop:
>
> Benchmark Mode Cnt Score
On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 12:27:40 GMT, David Beaumont wrote:
> Initial benchmark to capture at least some comparative measures of
> ImageReader performance.
>
> Current results on my laptop:
>
> Benchmark Mode Cnt Score
3.752 ± 6.873
> ms/op
>
> The upcoming changes to ImageReader should show significant improvements to
> these results.
David Beaumont has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
Renaming class.
-
Changes:
- all
On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 13:18:19 GMT, David Beaumont wrote:
>> Initial benchmark to capture at least some comparative measures of
>> ImageReader performance.
>>
>> Current results on my laptop:
>>
>> Benchmark M
Refactoring `ImageReader` to make it easy to add preview mode functionality for
Valhalla.
This PR is a large change to `ImageReader` (effectively a rewrite) but reduces
the surface area of the API significantly, reduces code complexity and
increases performance/memory efficiency. The need for t
On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 23:27:49 GMT, David Beaumont wrote:
> Refactoring `ImageReader` to make it easy to add preview mode functionality
> for Valhalla.
>
> This PR is a large change to `ImageReader` (effectively a rewrite) but
> reduces the surface area of the API significantl
3.752 ± 6.873
> ms/op
>
> The upcoming changes to ImageReader should show significant improvements to
> these results.
David Beaumont has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
Some tidying up relating to the state objects.
--
On Tue, 1 Jul 2025 17:02:27 GMT, David Beaumont wrote:
>> Initial benchmark to capture at least some comparative measures of
>> ImageReader performance.
>>
>> Current results on my laptop:
>>
>> Benchmark M
On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 22:19:18 GMT, David Beaumont wrote:
> Added jimage and jrtfs exports.
Doing it on its own means not having to find someone who can approve both the
makefile change and the benchmark at the same time. People say that things
should be split up into independent things, s
17 matches
Mail list logo
