RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava

2024-07-24 Thread Brian Burkhalter
This proposed change would move the native objects required for NIO file interaction from the libnio native library to the libjava native library on Linux, macOS, and Windows. - Commit messages: - 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava Cha

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava

2024-07-24 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 19:11:42 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote: > This proposed change would move the native objects required for NIO file > interaction from the libnio native library to the libjava native library on > Linux, macOS, and Windows. This change passes CI tiers 1-5 jobs on all

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava

2024-07-25 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 19:11:42 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote: > This proposed change would move the native objects required for NIO file > interaction from the libnio native library to the libjava native library on > Linux, macOS, and Windows. Yes, I was wondering about changing the org

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava

2024-07-25 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 19:11:42 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote: > This proposed change would move the native objects required for NIO file > interaction from the libnio native library to the libjava native library on > Linux, macOS, and Windows. Perhaps `/native/libjava/nio/ch` and

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v2]

2024-07-26 Thread Brian Burkhalter
> This proposed change would move the native objects required for NIO file > interaction from the libnio native library to the libjava native library on > Linux, macOS, and Windows. Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava

2024-07-26 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 10:05:03 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote: > Also think to work through some naming on IOUtil vs. NIOUtil as it won't be > obvious to maintainers which class to use. Maybe `NIOUtil` should be `NetUtil` as its methods appear to be invoked only by classes involved in networking?

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v2]

2024-08-05 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Mon, 5 Aug 2024 15:19:33 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: > This will introduce a source code dependency from libjava to libnio. It might > be the correct thing to do, but I just want to highlight this. I'll look into improving it. > make/modules/java.base/lib/CoreLibraries.gmk line 71: > >>

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v3]

2024-08-07 Thread Brian Burkhalter
> This proposed change would move the native objects required for NIO file > interaction from the libnio native library to the libjava native library on > Linux, macOS, and Windows. Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v2]

2024-08-07 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 19:40:24 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote: >> This proposed change would move the native objects required for NIO file >> interaction from the libnio native library to the libjava native library on >> Linux, macOS, and Windows. > > Brian Burkhalter has

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v4]

2024-08-07 Thread Brian Burkhalter
> This proposed change would move the native objects required for NIO file > interaction from the libnio native library to the libjava native library on > Linux, macOS, and Windows. Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The in

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v2]

2024-08-07 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Mon, 5 Aug 2024 15:37:46 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote: >> make/modules/java.base/lib/CoreLibraries.gmk line 57: >> >>> 55: OPTIMIZATION := HIGH, \ >>> 56: EXTRA_HEADER_DIRS := \ >>> 57: libnio/ch, \ >> >> This will introduce

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v4]

2024-08-07 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Wed, 7 Aug 2024 15:56:06 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: >> Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request with a new target base due to >> a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes >> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contai

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v4]

2024-08-07 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Wed, 7 Aug 2024 16:00:26 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote: >> make/modules/java.base/lib/CoreLibraries.gmk line 71: >> >>> 69: -framework Foundation \ >>> 70: -framework SystemConfiguration, \ >>> 71: LIBS_windows := advapi3

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v4]

2024-08-07 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Wed, 7 Aug 2024 16:03:33 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote: >> I will check. Thanks for noticing it. > > `CoreServices` is still necessary ([Uniform Type > Identifier](https://developer.apple.com/documentation/uniformtypeidentifiers)s). The Windows libs are also still required fo

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v4]

2024-08-08 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Thu, 8 Aug 2024 09:11:31 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote: >> Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request with a new target base due to >> a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes >> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contai

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v4]

2024-08-08 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Thu, 8 Aug 2024 12:18:04 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: >> The Windows libs are also still required for `TransmitFile` and >> `WSAGetLastError`: >> >> - ```mswsock.lib: FileDispatcherImpl.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved >> external symbol TransmitFile``` >> - ```ws2_32.lib: FileDispatcherIm

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v4]

2024-08-08 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Thu, 8 Aug 2024 14:31:09 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote: >> And pthread? > > I will check. `pthread` is still needed: open/src/java.base/unix/native/libjava/nio/ch/NativeThread.c:83: error: undefined reference to 'pthread_kill' - PR Review Comment: https

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v4]

2024-08-08 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Thu, 8 Aug 2024 15:16:14 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote: >> I have not seen any failures in CI testing. Is there a specific test that >> would reveal whether this is a problem? > > It may be because we have no IPv4 only machine in the CI? It seems strange > that IPv6 is treated differently than IPv

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v4]

2024-08-08 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Thu, 8 Aug 2024 16:18:28 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote: >> How would you suggest testing this? > > I don't know - you added that code to Inet6AddressImpl - so presumably a test > was failing without that code? > Which test was that? It wasn't obvious to me that adding code to load the > "net" libr

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v4]

2024-08-08 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Thu, 8 Aug 2024 16:39:33 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote: >> I'll have to investigate. > > Possibly - if you made isIPv6Supported() in InetAddress.c return false, you > might be able to see the issue in the same test that you observed failing > without your change. > > InetAddress has a static blo

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v4]

2024-08-08 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Thu, 8 Aug 2024 16:48:24 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote: >> Possibly - if you made isIPv6Supported() in InetAddress.c return false, you >> might be able to see the issue in the same test that you observed failing >> without your change. >> >> InetAddress has a s

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v4]

2024-08-09 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Fri, 9 Aug 2024 09:40:59 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: >> `pthread` is still needed: >> >> open/src/java.base/unix/native/libjava/nio/ch/NativeThread.c:83: error: >> undefined reference to 'pthread_kill' > > Ok then. Thank you for your thorough checking! Thank you for suggesting it! -

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v4]

2024-08-09 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Fri, 9 Aug 2024 09:05:49 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote: >> Without loading libnet in Inet6AddressImpl, the test >> java/net/InetAddress/NullCharInHostnameDriver.java fails with >> UnsatisfiedLinkError: >> >> java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: 'java.net.InetAddress[] >> java.net.Inet6AddressImpl.loo

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v4]

2024-08-09 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Fri, 9 Aug 2024 15:47:07 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote: >> Loading "net" was removed from IOUtil so I am thinking that IOUtil must have >> been initialized somewhere before constructing Inet6AddressImpl, but I've >> not identified where just yet. > > I see. Inet6AddressImpl and Inet4AddressImpl ar

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v5]

2024-08-09 Thread Brian Burkhalter
> This proposed change would move the native objects required for NIO file > interaction from the libnio native library to the libjava native library on > Linux, macOS, and Windows. Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v4]

2024-08-09 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Fri, 9 Aug 2024 15:58:50 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote: >> I see. Inet6AddressImpl and Inet4AddressImpl are symetric classes >> implementing InetAddressImpl. Both will make native calls to the "net" >> library - so both require the library to be loaded. >>

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v4]

2024-08-09 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Thu, 8 Aug 2024 14:33:15 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote: >> src/java.base/windows/native/libjava/IOUtil.c line 37: >> >>> 35: #include "nio.h" >>> 36: #include "nio_util.h" >>> 37: /* #include "net_util.h" */ >>

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava

2024-08-09 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 21:34:07 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote: > > Also think to work through some naming on IOUtil vs. NIOUtil as it won't be > > obvious to maintainers which class to use. > > Maybe `NIOUtil` should be `NetUtil` as its methods appear to be invoked only &

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v5]

2024-08-12 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 15:46:13 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote: > please do not integrate this change until I get time Sure, of course I will not. Thanks to @magicus and @dfuch for helping to make it better. - PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20317#issuecomment-2284529067

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v5]

2024-09-09 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Fri, 9 Aug 2024 17:59:12 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote: >> This proposed change would move the native objects required for NIO file >> interaction from the libnio native library to the libjava native library on >> Linux, macOS, and Windows. > > Brian Burkhalter has

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v5]

2024-09-10 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 11:06:28 GMT, Daniel Jeliński wrote: >> Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request incrementally with one >> additional commit since the last revision: >> >> 8337143: Remove loading libnet from Inet6AddressImpl; delete commented out >>

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v6]

2024-09-10 Thread Brian Burkhalter
> This proposed change would move the native objects required for NIO file > interaction from the libnio native library to the libjava native library on > Linux, macOS, and Windows. Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase.

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v5]

2024-09-11 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Wed, 11 Sep 2024 06:00:23 GMT, Daniel Jeliński wrote: >> And you did not get `mswsock.lib: FileDispatcherImpl.obj : error LNK2019: >> unresolved external symbol TransmitFile`? > > Right. This PR moves FileDispatcherImpl.c to libjava, so > FileDispatcherImpl.obj is no longer there. I'm guessi

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v5]

2024-09-11 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Wed, 11 Sep 2024 16:48:24 GMT, Daniel Jeliński wrote: >> From a clean build in the CI with `mswsock.lib` removed: >> >> >> [2024-09-11T16:00:17,816Z] FileDispatcherImpl.obj : error LNK2019: >> unresolved external symbol >> TransmitFile referenced in function >> Java_sun_nio_ch_FileDispatch

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v5]

2024-09-11 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 11:27:05 GMT, Daniel Jeliński wrote: >> Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request incrementally with one >> additional commit since the last revision: >> >> 8337143: Remove loading libnet from Inet6AddressImpl; delete commented out >>

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v5]

2024-09-11 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Wed, 11 Sep 2024 19:28:39 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: >> Apparently I did remove it from libjava and not libnio. It will be fixed in >> the next commit. Thanks for being persistent. > > Just to be absolutely clear: All my other comments about removing unneeded > libraries were about libni

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v5]

2024-09-11 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 09:54:56 GMT, Daniel Jeliński wrote: >> Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request incrementally with one >> additional commit since the last revision: >> >> 8337143: Remove loading libnet from Inet6AddressImpl; delete commented out >>

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v7]

2024-09-11 Thread Brian Burkhalter
> This proposed change would move the native objects required for NIO file > interaction from the libnio native library to the libjava native library on > Linux, macOS, and Windows. Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v5]

2024-09-11 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 13:26:58 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: >> make/modules/java.base/Lib.gmk line 81: >> >>> 79: libjava/nio/ch \ >>> 80: libnio/ch \ >>> 81: libnio/fs \ >> >> libnio/fs is gone on all platforms other than aix; is this still necessary? > > We can't add e

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v5]

2024-09-11 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Wed, 11 Sep 2024 19:31:02 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote: >> Just to be absolutely clear: All my other comments about removing unneeded >> libraries were about libnio, not libjava. I realize I made the comment in >> the PR next to libjava, but my intention was to ask if the

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v5]

2024-09-11 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Wed, 11 Sep 2024 16:51:43 GMT, Daniel Jeliński wrote: >> Yes, it still needs to be called in a few places, e.g., for classes whose >> native component needs the `fdval()` and `handleval()` functions. > > that's a good point. The comment might need to be updated to reflect that. Comments adde

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v5]

2024-09-11 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Wed, 11 Sep 2024 19:22:00 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote: >> src/java.base/windows/classes/sun/nio/fs/WindowsNativeDispatcher.java line >> 1097: >> >>> 1095: >>> 1096: static { >>> 1097: jdk.internal.loader.BootLoader.loadLibrary("

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v7]

2024-09-12 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 06:24:50 GMT, Daniel Jeliński wrote: > Thanks for making the changes. LGTM, assuming that tests still pass. The tests passed the JDK tiers 1-3 tests on Linux, macOS, and Windows. In any case, I will run another round of tests before integrating. > src/java.base/unix/native/

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v5]

2024-09-12 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 02:05:50 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote: >> We don't need it in `libjava`, but `NTLMAuthentication` was (perhaps >> unwittingly) relying on it to load `net.dll` during boot phase 2. I'll move >> the load to a more appropriate location in t

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v7]

2024-09-12 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:43:32 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote: > Can you hold off integrating, I plan to go over the changes soon. I don't plan to integrate until you have reviewed it. I set the minimum reviewer count to 3 to avoid doing so accidentally. - PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.o

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v5]

2024-09-13 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 16:06:26 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote: >> hmm... I don't see any issue in adding the load call to >> `NTLMAuthentication` but I'm surprised that it's even needed: I'd expect >> that libnet would have been loaded before we reach NTLMAuthentication. > > I wonder - do you see any f

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v5]

2024-09-13 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 16:08:50 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote: >> I wonder - do you see any failure if you don't load libnet from there? > > Yes, there was an `UnsatisfiedLinkError` in the native method > `isTrustedSiteAvailable()` in `NTLMAuthentication`. > [...] I'd e

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v5]

2024-09-13 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 16:31:36 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote: >>> [...] I'd expect that libnet would have been loaded before we reach >>> NTLMAuthentication. >> >> In the (as of now) penultimate webrev 4f47d5a (Merge), >> `WindowsNativeDispatcher` loaded it during boot phase 2. I think that >> withou

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v5]

2024-09-13 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 16:45:22 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote: >> I would have to check. The failure I observed occurred in both of these tests >> >> test/jdk/sun/net/www/protocol/http/NoNTLM.java >> test/jdk/sun/net/www/protocol/http/TestTransparentNTLM.java >> >> and nowhere else. > > I see. The test

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v8]

2024-09-13 Thread Brian Burkhalter
> This proposed change would move the native objects required for NIO file > interaction from the libnio native library to the libjava native library on > Linux, macOS, and Windows. Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v7]

2024-09-13 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 19:30:42 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: >> Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request incrementally with one >> additional commit since the last revision: >> >> 8337143: Clean up to address reviewer comments > > make/modules/java.base

Re: RFR: JDK-8302801: Remove fdlibm C sources [v2]

2023-03-02 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 18:31:54 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote: >> While the review of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/12800 finishes up, I >> thought I'd get out for the review the next phase of the FDLIBM port: >> removing the FDLIBM C sources from the repo. >> >> A repo with the changes for JDK-83020

Re: RFR: JDK-8302801: Remove fdlibm C sources [v3]

2023-03-02 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 19:55:39 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote: >> While the review of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/12800 finishes up, I >> thought I'd get out for the review the next phase of the FDLIBM port: >> removing the FDLIBM C sources from the repo. >> >> A repo with the changes for JDK-83020

Re: RFR: 8303799: [BACKOUT] JDK-8302801 Remove fdlibm C sources

2023-03-07 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Wed, 8 Mar 2023 02:27:21 GMT, David Holmes wrote: > This reverts commit b5b5cba7feb0e7ef957fd6bef1e591fdb6fdaa9f. > > Thanks. Marked as reviewed by bpb (Reviewer). - PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12916

Re: RFR: JDK-8306983: Do not invoke external programs when switch terminal to raw mode on selected platforms [v2]

2023-05-09 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Fri, 5 May 2023 12:34:29 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote: >> To support JShell and other usecases, the JDK uses JLine, which provides >> line-editing functionality inside a terminal. >> >> JLine has several ways to work with the terminal, based on various >> additional libraries and tools. Most of th

Re: RFR: JDK-8306983: Do not invoke external programs when switch terminal to raw mode on selected platforms [v3]

2023-05-19 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Thu, 11 May 2023 14:17:56 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote: >> To support JShell and other usecases, the JDK uses JLine, which provides >> line-editing functionality inside a terminal. >> >> JLine has several ways to work with the terminal, based on various >> additional libraries and tools. Most of t

Re: RFR: 8312522: Implementation of Foreign Function & Memory API [v3]

2023-08-10 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 20:43:28 GMT, Jorn Vernee wrote: >> This patch contains the implementation of the foreign linker & memory API >> JEP for Java 22. The initial patch is composed of commits brought over >> directly from the [panama-foreign >> repo](https://github.com/openjdk/panama-foreign).

Re: RFR: 8341881: [REDO] java/nio/file/attribute/BasicFileAttributeView/CreationTime.java#tmp fails on alinux3

2024-10-11 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 03:14:40 GMT, SendaoYan wrote: > Hi all, > On alinux3(alibaba cloud linux version 3) system, the /tmp disk partition is > mounted as tmpfs filesystem type, this filesystem type doesn't support create > time(birth time). > This PR is a REDO PR of https://github.com/openjdk/jd

Re: RFR: 8341881: [REDO] java/nio/file/attribute/BasicFileAttributeView/CreationTime.java#tmp fails on alinux3

2024-10-11 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 03:14:40 GMT, SendaoYan wrote: > Hi all, > On alinux3(alibaba cloud linux version 3) system, the /tmp disk partition is > mounted as tmpfs filesystem type, this filesystem type doesn't support create > time(birth time). > This PR is a REDO PR of https://github.com/openjdk/jd

Re: RFR: 8341881: [REDO] java/nio/file/attribute/BasicFileAttributeView/CreationTime.java#tmp fails on alinux3

2024-10-11 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 14:37:00 GMT, Chen Liang wrote: >> Hi all, >> On alinux3(alibaba cloud linux version 3) system, the /tmp disk partition is >> mounted as tmpfs filesystem type, this filesystem type doesn't support >> create time(birth time). >> This PR is a REDO PR of https://github.com/open

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v8]

2024-11-05 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 20:41:27 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote: >> This proposed change would move the native objects required for NIO file >> interaction from the libnio native library to the libjava native library on >> Linux, macOS, and Windows. > > Brian Burkhalter has

Re: RFR: 8338411: Implement JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security Manager [v4]

2024-10-28 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 12:29:07 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote: >> This is the implementation of JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security >> Manager. See [JEP 486](https://openjdk.org/jeps/486) for more details. The >> [CSR](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8338412) describes in detail the >> main ch

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v10]

2024-11-27 Thread Brian Burkhalter
> This proposed change would move the native objects required for NIO file > interaction from the libnio native library to the libjava native library on > Linux, macOS, and Windows. Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase.

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v8]

2024-11-19 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 20:41:27 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote: >> This proposed change would move the native objects required for NIO file >> interaction from the libnio native library to the libjava native library on >> Linux, macOS, and Windows. > > Brian Burkhalter has

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v9]

2024-11-19 Thread Brian Burkhalter
> This proposed change would move the native objects required for NIO file > interaction from the libnio native library to the libjava native library on > Linux, macOS, and Windows. Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase.

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v11]

2024-12-05 Thread Brian Burkhalter
> This proposed change would move the native objects required for NIO file > interaction from the libnio native library to the libjava native library on > Linux, macOS, and Windows. Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase.

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v11]

2025-02-10 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Thu, 5 Dec 2024 18:44:06 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote: >> This proposed change would move the native objects required for NIO file >> interaction from the libnio native library to the libjava native library on >> Linux, macOS, and Windows. > > Brian Burkhalter has

Re: RFR: 8349868: Remove unneeded libjava shared library dependency from jtreg test libNewDirectByteBuffer, libDirectIO and libInheritedChannel

2025-02-12 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 17:26:59 GMT, Jiangli Zhou wrote: > please let me know your internal testing result. Sure, of course. - PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23575#issuecomment-2654400869

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v12]

2025-04-08 Thread Brian Burkhalter
> This proposed change would move the native objects required for NIO file > interaction from the libnio native library to the libjava native library on > Linux, macOS, and Windows. Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase.

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v11]

2025-03-11 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Thu, 5 Dec 2024 18:44:06 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote: >> This proposed change would move the native objects required for NIO file >> interaction from the libnio native library to the libjava native library on >> Linux, macOS, and Windows. > > Brian Burkhalter has

Re: RFR: 8349868: Remove unneeded libjava shared library dependency from jtreg test libNewDirectByteBuffer, libDirectIO and libInheritedChannel

2025-02-13 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 03:00:13 GMT, Jiangli Zhou wrote: > Please review the fix that removes libjava shared library dependency from > jtreg test libNewDirectByteBuffer, libDirectIO and libInheritedChannel. Thanks Marked as reviewed by bpb (Reviewer). - PR Review: https://git.openjdk

Re: RFR: 8349868: Remove unneeded libjava shared library dependency from jtreg test libNewDirectByteBuffer, libDirectIO and libInheritedChannel

2025-02-12 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 17:26:59 GMT, Jiangli Zhou wrote: > I think testing should not run into any issue I did not find any problem for the tests in the [jdk_nio](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/55097dd4cbb5d691c12cb0247d66dce593759d59/test/jdk/TEST.groups#L206) group on Linux, macOS, or Wind

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v13]

2025-05-06 Thread Brian Burkhalter
> This proposed change would move the native objects required for NIO file > interaction from the libnio native library to the libjava native library on > Linux, macOS, and Windows. Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase.

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v14]

2025-05-29 Thread Brian Burkhalter
> This proposed change would move the native objects required for NIO file > interaction from the libnio native library to the libjava native library on > Linux, macOS, and Windows. Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase.

Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v15]

2025-07-01 Thread Brian Burkhalter
> This proposed change would move the native objects required for NIO file > interaction from the libnio native library to the libjava native library on > Linux, macOS, and Windows. Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase.