On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 08:19:19 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> On linux ppc64 / gcc , we build with the compile flag
> -minsert-sched-nops=regroup_exact ; this is most likely outdated, maybe it
> was still useful for old Power6 machines.
>
> See
> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-11.1.0/gcc/RS
On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 08:19:19 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> On linux ppc64 / gcc , we build with the compile flag
> -minsert-sched-nops=regroup_exact ; this is most likely outdated, maybe it
> was still useful for old Power6 machines.
>
> See
> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-11.1.0/gcc/RS
On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 13:25:20 GMT, Axel Boldt-Christmas
wrote:
> `GTEST_SKIPPED` tests count is accounted in gtests run. But when we calculate
> the number of GTEST errors we take `ERROR = RUN - PASSED - FAILED`. We need
> parse and account for the skipped as well. Currently we only account for
On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 13:25:20 GMT, Axel Boldt-Christmas
wrote:
> `GTEST_SKIPPED` tests count is accounted in gtests run. But when we calculate
> the number of GTEST errors we take `ERROR = RUN - PASSED - FAILED`. We need
> parse and account for the skipped as well. Currently we only account for
On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 08:19:19 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> On linux ppc64 / gcc , we build with the compile flag
> -minsert-sched-nops=regroup_exact ; this is most likely outdated, maybe it
> was still useful for old Power6 machines.
>
> See
> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-11.1.0/gcc/RS
On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 12:53:35 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Most of the JDK code base has been transitioned to UTF-8, but not all. This
>> has recently become an acute problem, since our mixing of iso-8859-1 and
>> utf-8 in properties files confused the version of `sed` that is shipped with
On Sun, 13 Apr 2025 23:14:41 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Most of the JDK code base has been transitioned to UTF-8, but not all. This
>> has recently become an acute problem, since our mixing of iso-8859-1 and
>> utf-8 in properties files confused the version of `sed` that is shipped with
On Sun, 13 Apr 2025 23:14:41 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Most of the JDK code base has been transitioned to UTF-8, but not all. This
>> has recently become an acute problem, since our mixing of iso-8859-1 and
>> utf-8 in properties files confused the version of `sed` that is shipped with
`GTEST_SKIPPED` tests count is accounted in gtests run. But when we calculate
the number of GTEST errors we take `ERROR = RUN - PASSED - FAILED`. We need
parse and account for the skipped as well. Currently we only account for
`DISABLED` gtests (which are not counted as run tests).
This patch
On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 13:25:20 GMT, Axel Boldt-Christmas
wrote:
> `GTEST_SKIPPED` tests count is accounted in gtests run. But when we calculate
> the number of GTEST errors we take `ERROR = RUN - PASSED - FAILED`. We need
> parse and account for the skipped as well. Currently we only account for
Can I please get a review of this cleanup in the jtreg timeout handler
`GatherProcessInfoTimeoutHandler`?
As noted in https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8354565, this is a leftover
after the change done in https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8268626. The
`timeoutHandler` native test libra
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 05:50:03 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Can I please get a review of this cleanup in the jtreg timeout handler
> `GatherProcessInfoTimeoutHandler`?
>
> As noted in https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8354565, this is a leftover
> after the change done in https://bugs.openjdk.ja
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 05:50:03 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Can I please get a review of this cleanup in the jtreg timeout handler
> `GatherProcessInfoTimeoutHandler`?
>
> As noted in https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8354565, this is a leftover
> after the change done in https://bugs.openjdk.ja
13 matches
Mail list logo
