Re: RFR: 8351399: AIX: Better solution than JDK8348663

2025-03-08 Thread Abdelhak Zaaim
On Fri, 7 Mar 2025 09:28:15 GMT, Joachim Kern wrote: > With > [JDK-8348663](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8348663) [AIX] clang > pollutes the burned-in library search paths of the generated executables > an ugly workaround was introduced to get rid of the unwanted list of search > librari

Re: RFR: 8351399: AIX: Better solution than JDK8348663

2025-03-08 Thread Eirik Bjørsnøs
On Fri, 7 Mar 2025 09:28:15 GMT, Joachim Kern wrote: > With > [JDK-8348663](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8348663) [AIX] clang > pollutes the burned-in library search paths of the generated executables > an ugly workaround was introduced to get rid of the unwanted list of search > librari

Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads [v2]

2025-03-08 Thread snake66
> Replace hardcoded instances of `-lpthread` with `$(LIBPTHREAD)`, so that it's > possible to parameterize this for platforms that use different flags for > enabling posix threads. > > This work is a continuation of the work done by Greg Lewis in [1], but > generalized for the full JDK, and set

Re: RFR: 8351138: Running subset of gtests gets error printing result information [v3]

2025-03-08 Thread SendaoYan
On Wed, 5 Mar 2025 02:10:34 GMT, SendaoYan wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> This PR fix the makefile bug when there is no gtest 'disable tests' then >> report syntax error. >> >> Before this PR makefile used below command to get the 'disable tests' >> number, when there is no 'YOU HAVE [0-9]+ DISABLED

Re: RFR: 8351309: test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime/posixSig/TestPosixSig.java fails on static-jdk

2025-03-08 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On Wed, 5 Mar 2025 22:59:06 GMT, Jiangli Zhou wrote: > Please review this PR that excludes `libjsig` from being statically linked > with `static-jdk` `java` launcher by default. Please see details in > https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8351309 description and comments. Thanks But if we do no