On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 09:04:28 GMT, Ivan Bereziuk wrote:
>> The output for Jtreg v7.5 was
>> [enhanced](https://github.com/openjdk/jtreg/pull/217/files#diff-b6ab77bf651f1fd9a83c3ca0aab9cd24ae5c08cef41e6e257f7eaccc07c7c366R947)
>> with [information about skipped
>> tests](https://github.com/openjd
On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 15:35:03 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> When using the configure flag --enable-jvm-feature-opt-size (linux x86_64 opt
> build, gcc 11 devkit) we run into this error after the recent PCH related
> changes :
>
>
> cc1plus: error:
> /build_optsize/hotspot/variant-server/libjv
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 08:58:17 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> The special optimization settings for jvmtiEnterTrace.cpp on AIX can be
> removed ; the file compiles now some seconds with or without this workaround.
> The special settings were needed for ancient versions of xlC.
LGTM.
The special optimization settings for jvmtiEnterTrace.cpp on AIX can be
removed ; the file compiles now some seconds with or without this workaround.
The special settings were needed for ancient versions of xlC.
-
Commit messages:
- JDK-8349375
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 01:42:41 GMT, Jiangli Zhou wrote:
> Please review this minor cleanup. The related jtreg test,
> TracePinnedThreads.java/libTracePinnedThreads.c has already been removed by
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/21565 work (for
> [JDK-8338383](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/J
On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 12:14:35 GMT, Stefan Karlsson wrote:
>> The HotSpot Style Guide has a section about source files and includes. The
>> style used for includes have mostly been introduced by scripts when
>> includeDB was replaced, but also when various other enhancements to our
>> includes we
This is similar to https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/23431 change. It removes
libjvm.so as a recorded dependency for libExplicitAttach.so by not explicitly
link libExplicitAttach.so with libjvm.so at build time. To do that, it also
changes libExplicitAttach.c to dynamically lookup the JNI_GetC
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 08:58:17 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> The special optimization settings for jvmtiEnterTrace.cpp on AIX can be
> removed ; the file compiles now some seconds with or without this workaround.
> The special settings were needed for ancient versions of xlC.
Marked as reviewed
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 13:52:49 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> The splashscreen lib is currently built with LOW optimization.
> This might be fine because it is not very performance critical (and LOW is
> not really low when looking at the opt-flags used).
> But building it with SIZE optimization m
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 13:48:06 GMT, Joachim Kern wrote:
>> We (SAP) try to introduce the ‘IBM Open XL C/C++ for AIX 17.1.2’ (based on
>> clang 17) as a feasible compiler for jdk25, because in combination with the
>> 17.1.3 runtime this would enable the support for ubsan.
>> Unfortunately, the new
The splashscreen lib is currently built with LOW optimization.
This might be fine because it is not very performance critical (and LOW is not
really low when looking at the opt-flags used).
But building it with SIZE optimization makes it 10-20 % smaller on some
platforms which helps to reduce im
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 17:01:04 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> Please review this change that adds a `linux-x86-static` job in GHA. The job
>> builds the `static-jdk-image` release binary on linux-x64. Please see
>> https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/build-dev/2025-February/048830.html for
>> so
On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 01:12:49 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
>> Also to point it out if it's not clear already, `libjvm.so` is
>> implementation detail. One cannot safely that exists at runtime. The static
>> JDK case is a good example.
>
>> Also to point it out if it's not clear already, libjvm.so is
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 08:58:17 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> The special optimization settings for jvmtiEnterTrace.cpp on AIX can be
> removed ; the file compiles now some seconds with or without this workaround.
> The special settings were needed for ancient versions of xlC.
AIX is typically no
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 08:58:17 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> The special optimization settings for jvmtiEnterTrace.cpp on AIX can be
> removed ; the file compiles now some seconds with or without this workaround.
> The special settings were needed for ancient versions of xlC.
This pull request h
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 08:58:17 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> The special optimization settings for jvmtiEnterTrace.cpp on AIX can be
> removed ; the file compiles now some seconds with or without this workaround.
> The special settings were needed for ancient versions of xlC.
Thanks for the revi
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 08:58:17 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> The special optimization settings for jvmtiEnterTrace.cpp on AIX can be
> removed ; the file compiles now some seconds with or without this workaround.
> The special settings were needed for ancient versions of xlC.
Marked as reviewed
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 01:42:41 GMT, Jiangli Zhou wrote:
> Please review this minor cleanup. The related jtreg test,
> TracePinnedThreads.java/libTracePinnedThreads.c has already been removed by
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/21565 work (for
> [JDK-8338383](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/J
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 01:42:41 GMT, Jiangli Zhou wrote:
> Please review this minor cleanup. The related jtreg test,
> TracePinnedThreads.java/libTracePinnedThreads.c has already been removed by
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/21565 work (for
> [JDK-8338383](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/J
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 08:15:48 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
>> Please review this minor cleanup. The related jtreg test,
>> TracePinnedThreads.java/libTracePinnedThreads.c has already been removed by
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/21565 work (for
>> [JDK-8338383](https://bugs.openjdk.org/brow
On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 19:41:51 GMT, Jiangli Zhou wrote:
> Please review this change that adds a `linux-x86-static` job in GHA. The job
> builds the `static-jdk-image` release binary on linux-x64. Please see
> https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/build-dev/2025-February/048830.html for
> some addit
On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 19:41:51 GMT, Jiangli Zhou wrote:
> Please review this change that adds a `linux-x86-static` job in GHA. The job
> builds the `static-jdk-image` release binary on linux-x64. Please see
> https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/build-dev/2025-February/048830.html for
> some addit
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 13:52:49 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> The splashscreen lib is currently built with LOW optimization.
> This might be fine because it is not very performance critical (and LOW is
> not really low when looking at the opt-flags used).
> But building it with SIZE optimization m
23 matches
Mail list logo
