On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 17:25:40 GMT, Roman Kennke wrote:
>> This is the main body of the JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental).
>>
>> It is also a follow-up to #20640, which now also includes (and supersedes)
>> #20603 and #20605, plus the Tiny Class-Pointers parts that have been
>> previ
On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 05:00:46 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
>> Severin Gehwolf has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 180 commits:
>>
>> - Merge branch 'master' into jdk-8311302-jmodless-link
>> - Make capability in --help huma
On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 12:16:23 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> Magnus Ihse Bursie has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Remove FIXME
>
> I really wish we did not mess with `_stdcall` and `_cdecl` in this PR. A
> future me chasing
> This is the main body of the JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental).
>
> It is also a follow-up to #20640, which now also includes (and supersedes)
> #20603 and #20605, plus the Tiny Class-Pointers parts that have been
> previously missing.
>
> Main changes:
> - Introduction of the (
On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 12:16:23 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> Magnus Ihse Bursie has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Remove FIXME
>
> I really wish we did not mess with `_stdcall` and `_cdecl` in this PR. A
> future me chasing
On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 12:16:23 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> Magnus Ihse Bursie has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Remove FIXME
>
> I really wish we did not mess with `_stdcall` and `_cdecl` in this PR. A
> future me chasing
On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 13:27:41 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>> Please review this patch which adds a jlink mode to the JDK which doesn't
>> need the packaged modules being present. A.k.a run-time image based jlink.
>> Fundamentally this patch adds an option to use `jlink` even though your JDK
>> i
On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 17:25:40 GMT, Roman Kennke wrote:
>> This is the main body of the JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental).
>>
>> It is also a follow-up to #20640, which now also includes (and supersedes)
>> #20603 and #20605, plus the Tiny Class-Pointers parts that have been
>> previ
> This is the main body of the JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental).
>
> It is also a follow-up to #20640, which now also includes (and supersedes)
> #20603 and #20605, plus the Tiny Class-Pointers parts that have been
> previously missing.
>
> Main changes:
> - Introduction of the (
On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 13:27:41 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>> Please review this patch which adds a jlink mode to the JDK which doesn't
>> need the packaged modules being present. A.k.a run-time image based jlink.
>> Fundamentally this patch adds an option to use `jlink` even though your JDK
>> i
On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 17:25:40 GMT, Roman Kennke wrote:
>> This is the main body of the JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental).
>>
>> It is also a follow-up to #20640, which now also includes (and supersedes)
>> #20603 and #20605, plus the Tiny Class-Pointers parts that have been
>> previ
On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 17:25:40 GMT, Roman Kennke wrote:
>> This is the main body of the JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental).
>>
>> It is also a follow-up to #20640, which now also includes (and supersedes)
>> #20603 and #20605, plus the Tiny Class-Pointers parts that have been
>> previ
> Please review this patch which adds a jlink mode to the JDK which doesn't
> need the packaged modules being present. A.k.a run-time image based jlink.
> Fundamentally this patch adds an option to use `jlink` even though your JDK
> install might not come with the packaged modules (directory `jm
On Fri, 14 Jun 2024 06:49:34 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>>> My aim will be to bring this into JDK 24 with a JEP then. Hopefully we can
>>> bring this to a successful conclusion that way.
>>
>> @AlanBateman JEP draft is here:
>> https://openjdk.org/jeps/8333799
>>
>> Could you please help review
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 00:56:49 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
>> Magnus Ihse Bursie has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> fix: jvm_md.h was included, but not jvm.h...
>
> src/hotspot/os/windows/os_windows.cpp line 510:
>
>> 508: // Thr
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 15:21:10 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> This is the implementation of [JEP 479: _Remove the Windows 32-bit x86
>> Port_](https://openjdk.org/jeps/479).
>>
>> This is the summary of JEP 479:
>>> Remove the source code and build support for the Windows 32-bit x86 port.
>>>
On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 05:15:09 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
> For the test changes, I believe multiple `@test` tags to verify a JDK of
> linkable run-time image and another JDK with packaged modules are not
> necessary. Each test execution can only verify one JDK. The tests can keep
> one single `@tes
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 17:02:24 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>> test/jtreg-ext/requires/VMProps.java line 743:
>>
>>> 741: // jdk.jlink module has the following resource indicating a
>>> runtime-linkable
>>> 742: // image. It's the diff file for runtime linking of the
>>> java.base
On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 12:08:50 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> src/hotspot/os/windows/os_windows.cpp line 510:
>>
>>> 508: // Thread start routine for all newly created threads.
>>> 509: // Called with the associated Thread* as the argument.
>>> 510: static unsigned thread_native_entry(void* t) {
>
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 02:13:09 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
> Can someone confirm that use of `__stdcall` has no affect on name
> decorations, as there is no mention here about anything being ignored:
>
> https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/build/reference/decorated-names?view=msvc-170
>
> I would
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 15:21:10 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> This is the implementation of [JEP 479: _Remove the Windows 32-bit x86
>> Port_](https://openjdk.org/jeps/479).
>>
>> This is the summary of JEP 479:
>>> Remove the source code and build support for the Windows 32-bit x86 port.
>>>
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 16:27:42 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> Due to historical reasons, Oracle builds of OpenJDK do not include the man
> pages that are present in the OpenJDK source repo. Oracle JDK builds include
> man pages, and most likely all other OpenJDK builds.
>
> There is no need to
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 15:21:10 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> This is the implementation of [JEP 479: _Remove the Windows 32-bit x86
>> Port_](https://openjdk.org/jeps/479).
>>
>> This is the summary of JEP 479:
>>> Remove the source code and build support for the Windows 32-bit x86 port.
>>>
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 02:32:42 GMT, Alex Menkov wrote:
> Can someone confirm that use of `__stdcall` has no affect on name
> decorations, as there is no mention here about anything being ignored:
>
> https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/build/reference/decorated-names?view=msvc-170
>
> I would h
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 02:32:42 GMT, Alex Menkov wrote:
> In the page you mentioned:
@alexmenkov that is for C functions, not C++.
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21744#issuecomment-2463796536
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 05:26:37 GMT, Julian Waters wrote:
>>> Can someone confirm that use of `__stdcall` has no affect on name
>>> decorations, as there is no mention here about anything being ignored:
>>>
>>> https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/build/reference/decorated-names?view=msvc-170
>>>
On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 17:25:40 GMT, Roman Kennke wrote:
>> This is the main body of the JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental).
>>
>> It is also a follow-up to #20640, which now also includes (and supersedes)
>> #20603 and #20605, plus the Tiny Class-Pointers parts that have been
>> previ
27 matches
Mail list logo
