Re: RFR: 8343503: Problemlist support fastdebug/slowdebug build

2024-11-03 Thread David Holmes
On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 03:31:40 GMT, SendaoYan wrote: > Hi all, > Sometimes some tests only fails or crash run by fastdebug/slowdebug jdk > binary, such as > `java/lang/Thread/jni/AttachCurrentThread/AttachTest.java#id1` which has been > recorded by [JDK-8343244](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JD

Re: RFR: 8339783: Implement JEP 479: Remove the Windows 32-bit x86 Port [v17]

2024-11-03 Thread David Holmes
On Fri, 1 Nov 2024 16:04:55 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: >> This is the implementation of [JEP 479: _Remove the Windows 32-bit x86 >> Port_](https://openjdk.org/jeps/479). >> >> This is the summary of JEP 479: >>> Remove the source code and build support for the Windows 32-bit x86 port. >>>

Re: RFR: 8343503: Problemlist support fastdebug/slowdebug build

2024-11-03 Thread SendaoYan
On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 04:09:47 GMT, David Holmes wrote: >> Hi all, >> Sometimes some tests only fails or crash run by fastdebug/slowdebug jdk >> binary, such as >> `java/lang/Thread/jni/AttachCurrentThread/AttachTest.java#id1` which has >> been recorded by [JDK-8343244](https://bugs.openjdk.org/b

RFR: 8343503: Problemlist support fastdebug/slowdebug build

2024-11-03 Thread SendaoYan
Hi all, Sometimes some tests only fails or crash run by fastdebug/slowdebug jdk binary, such as `java/lang/Thread/jni/AttachCurrentThread/AttachTest.java#id1` which has been recorded by [JDK-8343244](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8343244). To make less CI noisy, we can disable these tests

Re: RFR: 8343503: Problemlist support fastdebug/slowdebug build

2024-11-03 Thread SendaoYan
On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 04:15:09 GMT, David Holmes wrote: >> Hi all, >> Sometimes some tests only fails or crash run by fastdebug/slowdebug jdk >> binary, such as >> `java/lang/Thread/jni/AttachCurrentThread/AttachTest.java#id1` which has >> been recorded by [JDK-8343244](https://bugs.openjdk.org/b

Re: RFR: 8339480: Build static-jdk image with a statically linked launcher [v9]

2024-11-03 Thread Jiangli Zhou
On Fri, 1 Nov 2024 16:25:59 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: >> As a prerequisite for Hermetic Java, we need a statically linked `java` >> launcher. It should behave like the normal, dynamically linked `java` >> launcher, except that all JDK native libraries should be statically, not >> dynamica

Re: RFR: 8338411: Implement JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security Manager [v6]

2024-11-03 Thread Alan Bateman
On Sun, 3 Nov 2024 11:25:13 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote: >> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/System.java line 1364: >> >>> 1362: * >>> 1363: * It is the responsibility of the provider of >>> 1364: * the concrete {@code LoggerFinder} implementation to ensure that >> >> This is s

Re: RFR: 8338411: Implement JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security Manager [v6]

2024-11-03 Thread Daniel Fuchs
On Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:25:06 GMT, ExE Boss wrote: >> Sean Mullan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a >> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 200 commits: >> >> - Merge remote-tracking branch 'jdk-sandbox/jep486' into JDK-8338411 >> - Modify three RMI tests

Re: RFR: 8338411: Implement JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security Manager [v6]

2024-11-03 Thread Alan Bateman
On Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:18:09 GMT, ExE Boss wrote: >> Sean Mullan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a >> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 200 commits: >> >> - Merge remote-tracking branch 'jdk-sandbox/jep486' into JDK-8338411 >> - Modify three RMI tests