On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 13:42:42 GMT, Roman Kennke wrote:
>> We're seeing failures in our nightly testing for tests
>> runtime/cds/appcds/SharedBaseAddress.java and
>> runtime/cds/SharedBaseAddress.java which I'm tracking in this bug
>> [JDK-8340212](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8340212)
>>
On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 10:57:24 GMT, Roman Kennke wrote:
>> This is the main body of the JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental).
>>
>> It is also a follow-up to #20640, which now also includes (and supersedes)
>> #20603 and #20605, plus the Tiny Class-Pointers parts that have been
>> prev
On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 20:51:49 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> src/jdk.security.jgss/share/classes/com/sun/security/jgss/InquireSecContextPermission.java
>> line 31:
>>
>>> 29:
>>> 30: /**
>>> 31: * This class is for GSS security context permissions.
>>
>> Why is the content of _this_ class modifie
On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 10:57:24 GMT, Roman Kennke wrote:
>> This is the main body of the JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental).
>>
>> It is also a follow-up to #20640, which now also includes (and supersedes)
>> #20603 and #20605, plus the Tiny Class-Pointers parts that have been
>> prev
> This is the main body of the JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental).
>
> It is also a follow-up to #20640, which now also includes (and supersedes)
> #20603 and #20605, plus the Tiny Class-Pointers parts that have been
> previously missing.
>
> Main changes:
> - Introduction of the (
On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 18:13:45 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> Deprecate the `jdk.jsobject` module for removal from the JDK, and ship it
>> with JavaFX instead.
>>
>> See [JDK-8337280](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8337280) / PR
>> openjdk/jfx#1529 for the JavaFX PR that will include the mo
> Deprecate the `jdk.jsobject` module for removal from the JDK, and ship it
> with JavaFX instead.
>
> See [JDK-8337280](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8337280) / PR
> openjdk/jfx#1529 for the JavaFX PR that will include the module with JavaFX.
> That PR describes the needed test scenarios
In JDK-8339548, we switched to use Debian snapshot
(https://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20240228T034848Z/) for bootstrap.
The reason is that we don't have a stable Debian release for RISC-V yet. And
Debian "sid" (https://httpredir.debian.org/debian) that we use for
debootstrapping RISC-V
On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 17:22:47 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Deprecate the `jdk.jsobject` module for removal from the JDK, and ship it
> with JavaFX instead.
>
> See [JDK-8337280](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8337280) / PR
> openjdk/jfx#1529 for the JavaFX PR that will include the module
On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 16:42:35 GMT, Nizar Benalla wrote:
>> Nizar Benalla has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> ADD TEST_DEPS when calling tests using test-$1
>>
>> drop docs/req.flg
>
> After the last change, I think we now
On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 18:42:38 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
>> Nizar Benalla has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> revert changes to RunTestsPrebuiltSpec.gmk
>
> make/autoconf/lib-tests.m4 line 330:
>
>> 328: AC_MSG_RESULT(
On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 16:19:51 GMT, Nizar Benalla wrote:
>> Please review this change that adds a new test root `docs` dedicated to
>> testing the documentation, which has been a work in progress for a while.
>> Tests for links, encoding, HTML, accessibility will be later added in
>> following P
On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 11:24:56 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
>> In general, I tried to remove any text from the Permission classes that
>> described behavior if the permissions were granted. So in the above I
>> removed the text because it had words like "protect" and "accessed" and
>> referred to `co
13 matches
Mail list logo
