On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:30:26 GMT, Vladimir Petko wrote:
>> This PR sets COMPATIBLE_CDS_ALIGNMENT_DEFAULT to auto for aarch64.
>> This allows to avoid configure error on arm64:
>>
>> $ sh configure --disable-jvm-feature-cds
>> ...
>> checking if CDS archive is available... no (CDS is disabled)
>
On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 18:23:18 GMT, Daniel Jeliński wrote:
> With the new implementation, it wakes up much more frequently,
Why? The number of unparks is unchanged. Are we seeing spurious unparks that
are consuming too much CPU?
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19778
On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 16:50:22 GMT, Daniel Jeliński wrote:
>> We use 2 ParkEvent instances per thread. The ParkEvent objects are never
>> freed, but they are recycled when a thread dies, so the number of live
>> ParkEvent instances is proportional to the maximum number of threads that
>> were li
On Wed, 26 Jun 2024 07:48:54 GMT, Daniel Jeliński wrote:
> the waiting thread wakes up, but still needs to compete with the notifying
> thread for the monitor.
No, a notified thread is moved from the wait-queue to the monitor-entry queue.
It is only unparked once the notifier thread releases
On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 16:50:22 GMT, Daniel Jeliński wrote:
>> We use 2 ParkEvent instances per thread. The ParkEvent objects are never
>> freed, but they are recycled when a thread dies, so the number of live
>> ParkEvent instances is proportional to the maximum number of threads that
>> were li
On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 11:20:38 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
>> Sometimes it would be helpful to have configure-support for adding
>> additional ubsan check options.
>> E.g. support new configure option
>> '--with-additional-ubsan-checks=' .
>
> Matthias Baesken has updated the pull request increm
On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 11:31:05 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> Sometimes it would be helpful to have configure-support for adding additional
> ubsan check options.
> E.g. support new configure option
> '--with-additional-ubsan-checks=' .
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: efb9
On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 11:20:38 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
>> Sometimes it would be helpful to have configure-support for adding
>> additional ubsan check options.
>> E.g. support new configure option
>> '--with-additional-ubsan-checks=' .
>
> Matthias Baesken has updated the pull request increm
On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 15:37:43 GMT, Hamlin Li wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Can you help to review the patch?
>> This pr is based on previous work and discussion in [pr
>> 16234](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/16234), [pr
>> 18294](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/18294).
>>
>> Compared with previous
On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 23:50:20 GMT, Volodymyr Paprotski wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This pull request contains a backport of commit
> [f101e153](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/f101e153cee68750fcf1f12da10e29806875b522)
> from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
>
> The com
On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 23:50:20 GMT, Volodymyr Paprotski wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This pull request contains a backport of commit
> [f101e153](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/f101e153cee68750fcf1f12da10e29806875b522)
> from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
>
> The com
On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 18:55:14 GMT, Robert Toyonaga wrote:
> This PR changes GenerateJfrFiles.java so that the generated
> `JfrNativeSettings` union does not include JFR structs.`JfrNativeSettings` is
> meant to hold the settings for JFR events, but previously also included JFR
> structs such as
On Wed, 26 Jun 2024 03:11:41 GMT, Ioi Lam wrote:
>> Resolve `CONSTANT_MethodRef` entries during CDS dump time to improve
>> start-up performance.
>>
>> - This PR uses the same framework introduced in #19355 and just added
>> handling for methods.
>> - Support for getstatic/putstatic/invokestat
On Wed, 26 Jun 2024 17:00:23 GMT, Erik Gahlin wrote:
> All types in JFR is assigned an ID, regardless if they are events or a
> structs. If we are going to index into the array, with the event type ID,
> must not the holes be filled with something? Or are all native event type IDs
> first?
It
On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 18:55:14 GMT, Robert Toyonaga wrote:
> This PR changes GenerateJfrFiles.java so that the generated
> `JfrNativeSettings` union does not include JFR structs.`JfrNativeSettings` is
> meant to hold the settings for JFR events, but previously also included JFR
> structs such as
On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 18:55:14 GMT, Robert Toyonaga wrote:
> This PR changes GenerateJfrFiles.java so that the generated
> `JfrNativeSettings` union does not include JFR structs.`JfrNativeSettings` is
> meant to hold the settings for JFR events, but previously also included JFR
> structs such as
On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 18:55:14 GMT, Robert Toyonaga wrote:
> This PR changes GenerateJfrFiles.java so that the generated
> `JfrNativeSettings` union does not include JFR structs.`JfrNativeSettings` is
> meant to hold the settings for JFR events, but previously also included JFR
> structs such as
On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 16:50:22 GMT, Daniel Jeliński wrote:
>> We use 2 ParkEvent instances per thread. The ParkEvent objects are never
>> freed, but they are recycled when a thread dies, so the number of live
>> ParkEvent instances is proportional to the maximum number of threads that
>> were li
> fastdebug:
>
>
> # A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:
> #
> # Internal Error
> (/home/azul/azul/openjdk-git/src/hotspot/share/runtime/handles.inline.hpp:77),
> pid=878152, tid=878158
> # assert(_thread->is_in_live_stack((address)this)) failed: not on stack?
> #
On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 18:43:51 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote:
>> Jan Kratochvil has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Change the comment
>>- suggested by Thomas Stuefe
>
> make/autoconf/jdk-options.m4 line 449:
>
>> 447:
20 matches
Mail list logo
