RE: ubsan minimal runtime option and OpenJDK

>I'd say it looks like you need to link with another library? Where should the >__ubsan_handle_type_mismatch_minimal symbol come from? I don’t really know. Was wondering if anyone had already worked with this more. >>On the other hand, I tried the minimal runtime option with some standalone

Re: ubsan minimal runtime option and OpenJDK

On 2024-10-09 09:39, Baesken, Matthias wrote: Hi, I wanted to try the "minimal runtime" option of ubsan because it might be faster and has other benefits. See https://clang.llvm.org/docs/UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer.html#minimal-runtime

ubsan minimal runtime option and OpenJDK

Hi, I wanted to try the "minimal runtime" option of ubsan because it might be faster and has other benefits. See https://clang.llvm.org/docs/UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer.html#minimal-runtime Unfortunately it seems to be available only with clang on Linux, not (yet?) gcc, so I configured --with-ad