On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 10:06:32 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> We switched off unused-variable warnings for the file VMManagementImpl.c,
> this should be avoided.
> This came up in [JDK-8351542](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8351542) ,
Thanks for the reviews !
-
PR Comment: htt
On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 10:06:32 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> We switched off unused-variable warnings for the file VMManagementImpl.c,
> this should be avoided.
> This came up in [JDK-8351542](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8351542) ,
We know GetOptionalSupport can't realistically fail, unl
On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 10:06:32 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> We switched off unused-variable warnings for the file VMManagementImpl.c,
> this should be avoided.
> This came up in [JDK-8351542](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8351542) ,
Build changes look good to me.
-
Marked as
On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 10:06:32 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> We switched off unused-variable warnings for the file VMManagementImpl.c,
> this should be avoided.
> This came up in [JDK-8351542](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8351542) ,
In case someone has a good/better idea what to do with t
We switched off unused-variable warnings for the file VMManagementImpl.c, this
should be avoided.
This came up in [JDK-8351542](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8351542) ,
-
Commit messages:
- JDK-8351821
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24052/files
Webrev: https://we