On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 19:33:15 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
> Looks like you will have to more fully copy the pattern in the dynamic
> linking case.
Yeah, we still have to call it using the function address for the static case.
I sent https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/23600.
-
PR Comme
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 00:02:22 GMT, Jiangli Zhou wrote:
> Please review the change that looks up `FT_Property_Set` from the current
> executable first when running on static JDK. If `FT_Property_Set` can be
> found, don't `dlopen` `libfreetype.so`. If a bundled `libfreetype` is
> statically link
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 18:54:17 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
> I can confirm that `FT_Property_Set` does not seem to be there at all in the
> (older?) version of freetype from OL6.4.
Thanks for confirming!
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23574#issuecomment-2654591105
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 00:02:22 GMT, Jiangli Zhou wrote:
> Please review the change that looks up `FT_Property_Set` from the current
> executable first when running on static JDK. If `FT_Property_Set` can be
> found, don't `dlopen` `libfreetype.so`. If a bundled `libfreetype` is
> statically link
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 18:37:11 GMT, Henry Jen wrote:
>> Please review the change that looks up `FT_Property_Set` from the current
>> executable first when running on static JDK. If `FT_Property_Set` can be
>> found, don't `dlopen` `libfreetype.so`. If a bundled `libfreetype` is
>> statically lin
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 00:02:22 GMT, Jiangli Zhou wrote:
> Please review the change that looks up `FT_Property_Set` from the current
> executable first when running on static JDK. If `FT_Property_Set` can be
> found, don't `dlopen` `libfreetype.so`. If a bundled `libfreetype` is
> statically link
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 18:17:16 GMT, Jiangli Zhou wrote:
> This broke our builds:
>
> ```
> /jdk_git/open/src/java.desktop/share/native/libfontmanager/freetypeScaler.c:
> In function 'setInterpreterVersion':
> /jdk_git/open/src/java.desktop/share/native/libfontmanager/freetypeScaler.c:307:9:
> er
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 00:02:22 GMT, Jiangli Zhou wrote:
> Please review the change that looks up `FT_Property_Set` from the current
> executable first when running on static JDK. If `FT_Property_Set` can be
> found, don't `dlopen` `libfreetype.so`. If a bundled `libfreetype` is
> statically link
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 17:24:08 GMT, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
> This broke our builds:
>
> ```
> /jdk_git/open/src/java.desktop/share/native/libfontmanager/freetypeScaler.c:
> In function 'setInterpreterVersion':
> /jdk_git/open/src/java.desktop/share/native/libfontmanager/freetypeScaler.c:307:9:
>
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 17:24:39 GMT, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
> I don't see GHA testing enabled for this repo.
GHA testing is enabled: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/23574/checks. All
tests passed in GHA.
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23574#issuecomment-2654440345
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 00:02:22 GMT, Jiangli Zhou wrote:
> Please review the change that looks up `FT_Property_Set` from the current
> executable first when running on static JDK. If `FT_Property_Set` can be
> found, don't `dlopen` `libfreetype.so`. If a bundled `libfreetype` is
> statically link
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 05:07:08 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
>> Please review the change that looks up `FT_Property_Set` from the current
>> executable first when running on static JDK. If `FT_Property_Set` can be
>> found, don't `dlopen` `libfreetype.so`. If a bundled `libfreetype` is
>> statically lin
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 00:02:22 GMT, Jiangli Zhou wrote:
> Please review the change that looks up `FT_Property_Set` from the current
> executable first when running on static JDK. If `FT_Property_Set` can be
> found, don't `dlopen` `libfreetype.so`. If a bundled `libfreetype` is
> statically link
Please review the change that looks up `FT_Property_Set` from the current
executable first when running on static JDK. If `FT_Property_Set` can be found,
don't `dlopen` `libfreetype.so`. If a bundled `libfreetype` is statically
linked with the launcher executable (on static JDK), `FT_Property_Se
14 matches
Mail list logo