On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 13:52:49 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> The splashscreen lib is currently built with LOW optimization.
> This might be fine because it is not very performance critical (and LOW is
> not really low when looking at the opt-flags used).
> But building it with SIZE optimization m
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 13:52:49 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> The splashscreen lib is currently built with LOW optimization.
> This might be fine because it is not very performance critical (and LOW is
> not really low when looking at the opt-flags used).
> But building it with SIZE optimization m
On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 22:45:15 GMT, Harshitha Onkar wrote:
>>> What tests have you run?
>>
>> Had this in our internal test queue with jtreg / JCK plus some additional
>> SAP internal tests. No issues seen.
>> However I think I have to run some more manual tests on client like setups.
>>
>> Un
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 13:52:49 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> The splashscreen lib is currently built with LOW optimization.
> This might be fine because it is not very performance critical (and LOW is
> not really low when looking at the opt-flags used).
> But building it with SIZE optimization m
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 13:52:49 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> The splashscreen lib is currently built with LOW optimization.
> This might be fine because it is not very performance critical (and LOW is
> not really low when looking at the opt-flags used).
> But building it with SIZE optimization m
On Sun, 9 Feb 2025 14:39:13 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
>> I note that AIX seems to be the biggest beneficiary here. It doesn't seem to
>> be a big deal for anything else.
>>
>> I think what we are looking for in testing is no functional regression plus
>> minimal perf impact on startup.
>> B
On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 04:10:24 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
> I note that AIX seems to be the biggest beneficiary here. It doesn't seem to
> be a big deal for anything else.
Please note that AIX has the debuginfo in the same binary (.so file), unlike
e.g. Linux.
If you look at the size reduction of the
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 13:52:49 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> The splashscreen lib is currently built with LOW optimization.
> This might be fine because it is not very performance critical (and LOW is
> not really low when looking at the opt-flags used).
> But building it with SIZE optimization m
On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 14:11:15 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
>> What tests have you run?
>
>> What tests have you run?
>
> Had this in our internal test queue with jtreg / JCK plus some additional
> SAP internal tests. No issues seen.
> However I think I have to run some more manual tests on clien
On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 13:08:17 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> What tests have you run?
Had this in our internal test queue with jtreg / JCK plus some additional SAP
internal tests. No issues seen.
However I think I have to run some more manual tests on client like setups.
Unfortunately my Li
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 13:52:49 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> The splashscreen lib is currently built with LOW optimization.
> This might be fine because it is not very performance critical (and LOW is
> not really low when looking at the opt-flags used).
> But building it with SIZE optimization m
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 14:03:16 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>> The splashscreen lib is currently built with LOW optimization.
>> This might be fine because it is not very performance critical (and LOW is
>> not really low when looking at the opt-flags used).
>> But building it with SIZE optimization
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 13:52:49 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> The splashscreen lib is currently built with LOW optimization.
> This might be fine because it is not very performance critical (and LOW is
> not really low when looking at the opt-flags used).
> But building it with SIZE optimization m
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 13:52:49 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> The splashscreen lib is currently built with LOW optimization.
> This might be fine because it is not very performance critical (and LOW is
> not really low when looking at the opt-flags used).
> But building it with SIZE optimization m
The splashscreen lib is currently built with LOW optimization.
This might be fine because it is not very performance critical (and LOW is not
really low when looking at the opt-flags used).
But building it with SIZE optimization makes it 10-20 % smaller on some
platforms which helps to reduce im
15 matches
Mail list logo
