On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 13:11:22 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> When the static launcher was introduced in
>> [JDK-8339480](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8339480), due to time and
>> resource constraints, it was only working properly on Linux and macOS, while
>> the Windows port compiled
On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 13:05:53 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> src/java.desktop/windows/native/libawt/windows/awt_Mlib.cpp line 53:
>>
>>> 51: */
>>> 52: if (JVM_IsStaticallyLinked()) {
>>> 53: hDLL = ::GetModuleHandle(NULL);
>>
>> So this returns a handle to the pr
On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 22:10:29 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>> Magnus Ihse Bursie has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Fix comment
>
> src/hotspot/os/windows/os_windows.cpp line 316:
>
>> 314: }
>> 315:
>> 316: //
> When the static launcher was introduced in
> [JDK-8339480](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8339480), due to time and
> resource constraints, it was only working properly on Linux and macOS, while
> the Windows port compiled but did not work. Now the time has come to fix that.
>
> Most of
On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 21:52:10 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
>> Magnus Ihse Bursie has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Fix comment
>
> src/java.desktop/windows/native/libawt/windows/awt_Mlib.cpp line 53:
>
>> 51: */
>> 52:
On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 21:48:27 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
>> When the static launcher was introduced in
>> [JDK-8339480](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8339480), due to time and
>> resource constraints, it was only working properly on Linux and macOS, while
>> the Windows port compiled but did n
On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 15:41:51 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> When the static launcher was introduced in
> [JDK-8339480](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8339480), due to time and
> resource constraints, it was only working properly on Linux and macOS, while
> the Windows port compiled but
On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 15:41:51 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> When the static launcher was introduced in
> [JDK-8339480](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8339480), due to time and
> resource constraints, it was only working properly on Linux and macOS, while
> the Windows port compiled but
On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 15:41:51 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> When the static launcher was introduced in
> [JDK-8339480](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8339480), due to time and
> resource constraints, it was only working properly on Linux and macOS, while
> the Windows port compiled but
On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 15:41:51 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> When the static launcher was introduced in
> [JDK-8339480](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8339480), due to time and
> resource constraints, it was only working properly on Linux and macOS, while
> the Windows port compiled but
When the static launcher was introduced in
[JDK-8339480](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8339480), due to time and
resource constraints, it was only working properly on Linux and macOS, while
the Windows port compiled but did not work. Now the time has come to fix that.
Most of the changes
11 matches
Mail list logo
