On Sat, 14 Jun 2025 03:51:28 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The debuginfo file will not ship to customers generally, so I think it's not
> necessary to check the debuginfo files contains absolutive path or not. And I
> can't find why the debuginfo file always contains workspace path info
On Mon, 16 Jun 2025 06:57:35 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> We do expect the debuginfo files to be reproducible and hence free of
> absolute paths. This was implemented in
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8284437, where `-fdebug-prefix-map` was
> one of the mitigations applied. I would start
On Sat, 14 Jun 2025 03:51:28 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The debuginfo file will not ship to customers generally, so I think it's not
> necessary to check the debuginfo files contains absolutive path or not. And I
> can't find why the debuginfo file always contains workspace path info
Hi all,
The debuginfo file will not ship to customers generally, so I think it's not
necessary to check the debuginfo files contains absolutive path or not. And I
can't find why the debuginfo file always contains workspace path info with
--enable-ccache configure option.
-
Commit
