Hi,
* Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 07:18:00AM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > Audio output makes no difference but video output is the culprit: all
> > work except "gpu", i.e. "xv", "sdl", "x11" and "tct" quit fine without
> > segmentation fault.
> FWIW, still happens with the l
Hi,
My Thinkpad T450s paniced with uvm_fault while fetching a large git
repository to /usr/src. I had a read-only NFS share mounted during the
git pull and copied a file over to my local disk in the background.
The panic trace transcribed by hand. I can provide a photo upon
request:
uvm_fault
Hi,
I run
OpenBSD 6.7-current (GENERIC.MP) #250: Sun Jun 7 19:48:27 MDT 2020
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
on my Thinkpad T450s. While watching a movie mounted on a NFS share the
kernel paniced with the following message (transcribed by hand). The
m
Hi,
* Matthias Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I run
>
> OpenBSD 6.7-current (GENERIC.MP) #250: Sun Jun 7 19:48:27 MDT 2020
> dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
>
> on my Thinkpad T450s. While watching a movie mounted on a NFS share t
Hi Jonathan,
* Jonathan Gray wrote:
>
> You are using a snapshot just before the drm tree was replaced by a new
> port of drm from linux 5.7. Can you reproduce this with a newer
> snapshot?
So far not. I am now running OpenBSD 6.7-current (GENERIC.MP) #254: Mon
Jun 8 18:47:16 MDT 2020 and eve
Hi,
my system dropped into ddb when running X11 and quitting Firefox (with
the intention to quit X and shutdown). Suddenly it dropped into the
console and ddb and showed a uvm_fault(). I could not acquire a dump
since the system stuck in "syncing disks". After half an hour I
resetted the system
Hi,
* Matthias Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> my system dropped into ddb when running X11 and quitting Firefox (with
> the intention to quit X and shutdown). Suddenly it dropped into the
> console and ddb and showed a uvm_fault(). I could not acquire a dump
> since the system stuck
Hi Alexander,
* Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 07:06:34PM +0100, Matthias Schmidt wrote:
> > my system dropped into ddb when running X11 and quitting Firefox (with
> > the intention to quit X and shutdown).
>
> pf_test_rule+0xa0b is when pf_send_tcp() ca
Hi guys,
I'm currently facing a network performance degradation with two different
devices both connected via iwm(4) to the local access point. Both are
running 6.2-current, one with a snapshot from Dec 16 the other with a
snapshot from Dec 26. dmesg of one device attached. Both devices are
con
Hi again,
* Matthias Schmidt wrote:
>
> When I start a new download, the data transfer rate on both devices
> significantly drops after a while. When the transfer is still fast, my
> DSL router says that both devices are connected with 11n and have about
> 130Mbit/s. After a whi
Hi benno, hi Stefan,
* Sebastian Benoit wrote:
>
> and then running your test - with current, and maybe with the older "fast"
> kernel as well.
Sure, here you go. First run with the kernel from Dec 8, second run
with a fresh kernel from Jan 1. I also run netstat -W/-I for the second
run.
Chee
Hi,
* Peter Hessler wrote:
>
> Please don't do that. That information will likely tell us that the
2018-01-03T17:56:39.224Z sigma /bsd: - 00:1e:2a:e1:18:906! +9 54M ess
privacy rsn "ChaosUnlimited"!
2018-01-03T17:56:39.224Z sigma /bsd: - 04:f0:21:34:36:de8! +50 54M ess
p
Hi Stefan,
* Stefan Sperling wrote:
>
> I think a packet capture could shed some light on this.
> I would not be surprised if slowdowns coincide with your neighbours
> watching video streams or something over wifi.
What's strange is that this does not affect me with the kernel from Dec
8.
> I u
Hi,
* Stefan Sperling wrote:
>
> > If it helps further I'll record a dump from a second machine tomorrow.
> > I have the second system with iwm and another that I could set up with
> > an iwn.
>
> Yes please use iwn(4) in monitor mode.
Thanks to a number of spare disks and my Thinkpad X220 I go
Hi,
I installed a recent snapshot from June 23 and noticed that slaacd is
generating IPv6 addresses with privacy extensions enabled in a high
rate. I can easily reproduce the bug by just starting slaacd. After
one second I already see 29 IPv6 addresses:
$ ifconfig trunk0 | grep inet6 | wc -l
since I hit the issue in the first place.
* Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 08:34:46PM +0200, Matthias Schmidt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I installed a recent snapshot from June 23 and noticed that slaacd is
> > generating IPv6 addresses with privacy extensions
060: 0e10 ..
I can provide a longer dump as pcap on request.
Cheers
Matthias
* Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 08:34:46PM +0200, Matthias Schmidt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I installed a recent snapshot from
Hi,
today I wanted to use NetBSD 8.0 on vmm and it fails on boot always at
the same point (see dmesg below). I'm dropped from vmctl back to the
console and the following messages are shown on the OpenBSD host:
2018-09-22T10:11:04.327Z sigma /bsd: vmx_fault_page: uvm_fault returns 14,
GPA=0xfed4
Hi Andre,
* Andre Stoebe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know this little bug is pretty trivial and more so pedantic, but I
> wanted to report it nonetheless and especially ask for confirmation from
> other cwm users. It would be great if anyone could try to reproduce.
Yes, I can reproduce it here (since I h
Hi,
I upgraded to the latest snapshot (timestamp is from April 6) and
boot stucks at the loader prompt. After upgrading I see
the following message (transcript by hand):
Using drive 0, partition 3.
Loading.
probing: pc0 mem[... a20=on]
disk: hd0+
Usually, "sr0*" plus the loader info is fol
Hi,
* Jonathan Gray wrote:
>
> There is some kind of use after free or double free that triggers only
> when opting into the 'intel' driver on recent hardware instead of the
> 'modesetting' default.
>
> As you are using xf86-video-intel you are likely hitting that.
> Doesn't trigger on machines
>Synopsis: ntpd constraint validation shows timestamp from 1899
>Environment:
System : OpenBSD 7.0
Details : OpenBSD 7.0-current (GENERIC.MP) #216: Mon Jan 3
16:04:47 MST 2022
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC
>Synopsis: uvm_fault on resume SPL not lowered on syscall
>Environment:
System : OpenBSD 7.1
Details : OpenBSD 7.1-beta (GENERIC.MP) #381: Wed Feb 23
16:19:54 MST 2022
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
>Synopsis: imt(4) Touchpad stalls from time to time
>Environment:
System : OpenBSD 7.1
Details : OpenBSD 7.1-current (GENERIC.MP) #533: Thu May 19
07:38:57 MDT 2022
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
Hi,
weekly bump. Anyone (maybe jcs@) has an idea on how to debug this?
Cheers and thanks
Matthias
* Claudio Miranda wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I'm the person whom Matthias linked to. Seems as though we're having
> the same issue with the touchpad in spite of them being different
> laptop
Hi Joshua,
* joshua stein wrote:
> On Tue, 31 May 2022 at 15:37:21 +0200, Matthias Schmidt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > weekly bump. Anyone (maybe jcs@) has an idea on how to debug this?
>
> You could enable IHIDEV_DEBUG in ihidev.c and see if it logs
> anything when
Hi,
* Jonathan Gray wrote:
>
> This should be fixed in the latest snapshot.
Thanks. Is fixed for me.
Cheers
Hi,
today I wanted to upgrade my local ports because of the recent libc
bump. Turns out the ports build system cannot install packages any
longer and fails with a signify error. I only upgrade the two ports
I use whevener there is a library version bump, so it definitely worked
at that time (IIR
Hi,
* Marc Espie wrote:
> On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 06:25:03PM +0200, Matthias Schmidt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > today I wanted to upgrade my local ports because of the recent libc
> > bump. Turns out the ports build system cannot install packages any
> > longer a
Hi Claudio,
* Claudio Miranda wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just updated all my packages on both my OpenBSD 7.4-current systems
> (also updated to the latest snapshot) and I notice that Firefox is not
> launching. It spits out the following error when I launch it from the
> terminal.
>
> XPCOMGlueLoad e
>Synopsis: Display flickers upon touchpad movement
>Environment:
System : OpenBSD 7.2
Details : OpenBSD 7.2 (GENERIC.MP) #720: Sun Sep 11 15:41:58 MDT
2022
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
Architec
Hi Jonathan,
* Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 09:10:22AM +0200, Matthias Schmidt wrote:
> > >Synopsis: Display flickers upon touchpad movement
> > >Environment:
> > System : OpenBSD 7.2
> > Details : OpenBSD 7.2 (GENERIC.
Hi Jonathan,
* Jonathan Gray wrote:
>
> Can you remove the lines added in the diff one at a time
> to figure out which specific parameter is involved?
Result of commenting each of the following variables individually,
building a new kernel and rebooting each time.
dev_priv->params.panel_use_ssc
Hi,
I got the following message several times in dmesg upon suspend of my
Laptop. sd2 is the encrypted volume of sd0 which is the internal NVME
drive of the laptop.
softraid0: sd2: i/o error 5 @ CRYPTO block 3391043600
It happens reliabliy on suspend/resume, I haven't seen the message during
no
Hi,
* Sebastien Marie wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 07:39:21PM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> >
> > That lead to, as far as I can tell, to every package on the system being
> > reinstalled.
> >
> > However, unfortunately both firefox and thunderbird still dump core with
> > "Illegal i
* Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2023/06/13 11:57, Matthias Schmidt wrote:
> > $ pkg_info -vv screen | head -30
> > Information for inst:screen-4.9.0
> > [...]
> > Size: 1244302
> > Signature: screen-4.9.0,10,c.97.0,curses.14.0,util.16.0
> > Packing-list:
>
>Synopsis: Laptop doesn't resume from suspend any longer
>Environment:
System : OpenBSD 7.5
Details : OpenBSD 7.5-current (GENERIC.MP) #228: Sun Aug 4
11:53:42 MDT 2024
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
Hi Mark,
* Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2024 22:23:17 +0200
> > From: Matthias Schmidt
>
> Hi Matthias,
>
> Can you try to narrow this down a bit further?
>
> You can either bisect by building kernels from intermediate dates
> yourself or use ker
Hi Mark, hi bugs@,
after one week of vacation and seeing some ACPI related commits I tried
the latest -current snapshot, however, the problem is still there.
Anything else I can test or try?
Cheers
Matthias
* Matthias Schmidt wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> * Mark Kettenis wrote:
&
>Synopsis: Fatal firmware error with iwm
>Environment:
System : OpenBSD 6.9
Details : OpenBSD 6.9-current (GENERIC.MP) #4: Wed May 5 11:06:38
MDT 2021
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
Architecture
Hi Stefan,
* Stefan Sperling wrote:
>
> This patch also implements an automatic device reset in case we run into
> problems during BA session setup or teardown. You should no longer need
> to down/up the interface manually to get things going again.
>
> Could you run with this patch for a while
Hi Stefan,
* Stefan Sperling wrote:
>
> Given that this problem doesn't occur very frequently, my best guess is that
> the firmware is unhappy about us simply removing outstanding frames from Tx
> queues when we are stopping a Tx block ack session. This 'add sta' error,
> which happens during a r
Hi Stefan,
* Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 11:44:17AM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > Can you please run with this and let me know if it changes anything?
>
> I have finally managed to reproduce the problem locally by playing around
> with forced background scans and roaming.
Hi Stefan,
* Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 02:39:15PM +0200, Matthias Schmidt wrote:
> > I am now running
> >
> > OpenBSD 6.9-current (GENERIC.MP) #17: Wed May 12 11:14:50 MDT 2021
> > dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compil
>Synopsis: double fault while using IPSec
>Environment:
System : OpenBSD 6.9
Details : OpenBSD 6.9-current (GENERIC.MP) #82: Sat Jun 19 07:05:12
MDT 2021
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
Architectu
Hi Vitaliy,
* Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Have you tried this setup with previous snapshots? Which date they were?
No, I haven't. This was not a planned setup, I just did it out of
curiosity since I recognized a lot of IPSec changes in the tree over the
last year and want to give it a tr
Hi,
* Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 09:40:06AM +0200, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> > looks like there must be yet another code path, which
> > enters the recursion.
>
> Yes.
>
> Do you use routing domains in pf? Do you have reject or blackhole
> routes?
No, not that
Hi,
* Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 09:40:06AM +0200, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> > looks like there must be yet another code path, which
> > enters the recursion.
>
> Yes.
>
> Do you use routing domains in pf? Do you have reject or blackhole
> routes?
>
> Please se
Hi,
* Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> > > Could you try this diff?
> >
> > I have a kernel running with your diff over the last hours and created
> > quite some network traffic and the error didn't appear so far.
> > Previously, I was able to create it quite fast. So definitely an
> > improvement.
>
>
Hi,
* Paul de Weerd wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This morning I found one of my vmm VMs at the ddb> prompt. Mail, logs
> and the ps output from ddb all suggest this was during the daily(8)
> run of security(8): i did get the daily mail, but not the one from
> security (I was expecting one, as the machin
Hi,
* Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 07:24:14PM +0200, Matthias Schmidt wrote:
> > kernel: double fault trap, code=0
> > Stopped at m_copydata+0x17:pushq %r14
> > m_copydata(fd807cfbb100,14,14,800022e5d1d4) at m_copydata
51 matches
Mail list logo