On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:06:54AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2010/05/21 23:54, Chris Bayly wrote:
> > Okay, I believe I've finally simplified this down to something manageable,
> > and hopefully a heck of alot more repeatable.
> >
> > I have a second Alix 3D3 board running -current as o
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 07:18:29PM +0100, Andreas Bartelt wrote:
> On 03/01/18 09:07, Jiri B wrote:
> >On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 08:37:38AM +0100, Andreas Bartelt wrote:
> >>Please let me know if you need further infos on my specific config.
> >
> >I use this (OpenBSD 6.2-current (GENERIC.MP) #6: Tue
On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 07:22:05AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 07:18:29PM +0100, Andreas Bartelt wrote:
> > On 03/01/18 09:07, Jiri B wrote:
> > >On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 08:37:38AM +0100, Andreas Bartelt wrote:
> > >>Please let me know i
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 09:50:01PM +0200, Tom Beard wrote:
> The commit below to bgpd/rde_attr.c introduced a check for AS0 in the
> AS-PATH received in an UPDATE message:
>
> >revision 1.98
> >date: 2017/05/26 20:55:30; author: phessler; state: Exp; lines: +8 -2;
> >commitid: p82SYNnm0pVdbRCn;
On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 03:26:16PM +0200, Pierre Emeriaud wrote:
> Not sure about this, I guess if you're using 'network bulk add|del'
> you're supposed to know what you're doing and not shoot yourself in
> the foot, but here it goes:
>
> echo | bgpctl network bulk del
> crashes bgpd. On 6.3 and c
On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 03:34:10PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 03:26:16PM +0200, Pierre Emeriaud wrote:
> > Not sure about this, I guess if you're using 'network bulk add|del'
> > you're supposed to know what you're doing and not
On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 06:23:28PM +0200, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> Hi,
>
> fcntl(2) says:
>
> F_GETFD Get the close-on-exec flag associated with the file
> descriptor fd as FD_CLOEXEC. If the returned value
> ANDed with FD_CLOEXEC is 0, the file will remain open
>
On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 03:50:41PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 03:34:10PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 03:26:16PM +0200, Pierre Emeriaud wrote:
> > > Not sure about this, I guess if you're using 'network bulk add|d
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 01:07:48PM +0100, Pascal Mathis wrote:
> >Synopsis:OpenBGPD crashes when reloading with duplicate neighbor
> >Category:system
> >Environment:
> System : OpenBSD 6.8
> Details : OpenBSD 6.8 (GENERIC) #97: Sun Oct 4 18:00:46 MDT 2020
>
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 11:32:18AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 11:09:25AM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>
> > It's a relatively new driver. It uses MSI which pretty much rules out
> > an issue with shared interrupts. So I suspect this is an issue with
> > the rge(4) drive
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 08:31:46PM +0100, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> Florian Obser(flor...@openbsd.org) on 2021.01.12 17:56:28 +0100:
> > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 09:52:03AM -0700, Bob Beck wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 05:47:36PM +0100, Florian Obser wrote:
> > > > On Tue
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 09:27:58PM -0500, Ashton Fagg wrote:
> >Synopsis:Mouting iSCSI disk at boot time causes machine to enter single
> >user mode.
> >Category:Bug.
> >Environment:
> System : OpenBSD 6.9
> Details : OpenBSD 6.9-beta (GENERIC.MP) #346: Fri Feb 19 23:5
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 07:07:34AM -0500, Ashton Fagg wrote:
> Claudio Jeker writes:
>
> > Looking at the screenshot it seems there is a timing issue. The fsck -N
> > tries to run before the disk was actually attached. I guess the iscsid
> > startup script should wait
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 07:39:17AM -0500, Ashton Fagg wrote:
> Claudio Jeker writes:
>
> > I'm not sure. vscsi(4) is ready the moment the kernel starts init. So it
> > should not result in any problem for iscsid. What made you think this is
> > the issue?
>
&g
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 08:03:21PM -0500, Ashton Fagg wrote:
> Ashton Fagg writes:
>
> > Attached is my first attempt at a "proper" solution. I haven't tested it
> > beyond building as I can't take my machine down for testing right now...
> >
> > But, I'd appreciate a sanity check that I'm on the
On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 11:44:24AM +0100, Sacha wrote:
> Le 27/10/2019 à 08:54, Claudio Jeker a écrit :
> > On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 11:33:43PM +0200, Sacha wrote:
> >>
> >> *De :* Stuart Henderson
On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 02:03:21PM -0700, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Nov 2019 20:38:59 +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
>
> > I think the best way to handle it, is to make the kernel strict and
> > fix userland. If the kernel would allow the sloppiest userland
> > program to succeed, creatin
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 03:33:00PM +0100, Marko Cupać wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Dec 2019 12:01:37 +0100
> Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
>
> > Actually having /var mounted over MFS is absolutely not supported
> > (because this is where we store rollback tarballs and where syspatch
> > checks to see whether a
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 06:20:33PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 03:21:00PM +, Peter M??ller wrote:
> > tcp_output(80584ee0) at tcp_output+0x1941
> > tcp_output(80584ee0) at tcp_output+0x1941
> > tcp_output(80584ee0) at tcp_output+0x
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 01:31:08AM +0100, Alexandre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am running an OpenBSD/armv7 guest on a QEMU 4.2.0 "virt" machine host;
> see the attached file (from_qemu_virt.dts) for the fdt of the guest
> machine, it has only a virtio-mmio bus with a virtio-net device attached.
>
> Th
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 10:47:53AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 09/04/20(Thu) 20:22, Laurent Salle wrote:
> > On 08/04/2020 06.52, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> >
> > > It's the same bug as reported by sthen@. Two interfaces in the same
> > > subnet
> > > have two identical cloning routes:
> >
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 12:14:17PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 10/04/20(Fri) 11:18, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 10:47:53AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > On 09/04/20(Thu) 20:22, Laurent Salle wrote:
> > > > On 08/04/202
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 10:38:54AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 20/04/20(Mon) 14:27, Julian Brost wrote:
> > On 2020-04-20 12:14, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > >> login: panic: kernel diagnostic assertion "!ISSET(rt->rt_flags,
> > >> RTF_LOCAL)" failed: file "/usr/src/sys/netinet6/nd6.c", line 7
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 07:00:56PM -0400, Jason Mader wrote:
> >Synopsis: IPv6 Internet hosts unreachable without a workaround
> >Category: system amd64
> >Environment:
> System : OpenBSD 6.7
> Details : OpenBSD 6.7 (GENERIC.MP) #182: Thu May 7 11:11:58 MDT 2020
> dera...@amd64.openbsd.or
On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 12:47:58AM +0300, Esa Kuusisto wrote:
> Hi
>
> I upgraded today two openbsd routers with openbgpd from 6.6 -> 6.7. Upgrade
> was done using sysupgrade. Router1 and Router2 have two ebgp peers, two
> iBGP peers to local switches and one iBGP peer between Router1 <->Router2.
On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 05:32:01PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 08/31/16 23:49, Andrei-Marius Radu wrote:
> >[...]
> >Coming from a cisco/juniper background it's perfectly valid for a static
> >route to point
> >to a non-directly-connected next-hop as long as the next-hop can be
> >recursiv
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 01:08:11AM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 04:33:13PM +, Rivo Nurges wrote:
> > PF allows to filter based on route labels. Cloned routes created by PMTU
> > don't inherit route labels and PF filtering fails.
>
> We inherit the label for cloned r
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 09:50:10PM +, Ian Bobbitt wrote:
> >Synopsis:Getting errors in the MRT updates files output by OpenBGPD
> >Category:user
> >Environment:
> System : OpenBSD 6.0
> Details : OpenBSD 6.0 (GENERIC.MP) #2319: Tue Jul 26 13:00:43 MDT
> 2016
>
On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 03:07:37PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 02/07/15(Thu) 13:57, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On amd64, after a system update via snapshot, I start to see warning
> > messages in console (and to be complete, the running kernel is GENERIC.MP
> > with a patch on a
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 10:48:28AM -0400, bigras.br...@gmail.com wrote:
> >Synopsis:panic on octeon when receiving l2tp connection
> >Category:kernel
> >Environment:
> System : OpenBSD 5.8
> Details : OpenBSD 5.8-beta (GENERIC) #1: Sun Jun 28 20:14:14 CEST
> 2015
>
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 02:38:45PM -0300, Rafael Zalamena wrote:
> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 05:44:09PM +0300, rozdorozh...@k-zhytlo.com wrote:
> > >Synopsis: mpls provider doesn't forward packets
> > >Category: networking
> > >Environment:
> > System : OpenBSD 5.7
> > Details : Op
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 01:12:49AM -0400, Johan Huldtgren wrote:
> hello,
>
> I have a setup with two carp nodes, I was replacing one of these with
> new hardware (old was i386, new is amd64) and installed latest snapshot
> and then copied over all the relevant files from the old node, changing
>
On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 10:05:34PM +0200, Joonas Ruohonen wrote:
> On 11/08/15 21:36, Peter Hessler wrote:
> > On 2015 Nov 08 (Sun) at 18:52:58 +0200 (+0200), Joonas Ruohonen wrote:
> > :>Synopsis: gre(4) keepalives are sent from wrong rdomain
> > :>Category: kernel
> > :>Environment:
> > : Syste
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 03:45:28PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Two routers on a point-to-point ethernet, the link between them dropped
> out but ports stayed up. The link came back after ~2h or so but ospfd
> doesn't recover -
>
> first router:
>
> 195.95.187.31 FULL/OTHER 00:00:03 1
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 09:43:36PM +, Petri Mikkila wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 21 Nov 2017, Georgy Yakovlev wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > > On Nov 21, 2017, at 10:58 AM, Georgy Yakovlev wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> On Nov 21, 2017, at 8:49 AM, Hiltjo Posthuma
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Mon,
On Sat, Dec 09, 2017 at 08:26:58PM +0100, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> sorry for the delay, and thanks for the report and the analysis!
>
> here is a slighty changed version:
>
> diff --git usr.sbin/relayd/hce.c usr.sbin/relayd/hce.c
> index 5c5ee6f3013..bb2903c8dfa 100644
> --- usr.sbin
On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 10:44:52PM +0100, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> Claudio Jeker(clau...@openbsd.org) on 2017.12.10 12:52:55 +0100:
> > On Sat, Dec 09, 2017 at 08:26:58PM +0100, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > sorry for the dela
On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 04:55:18PM -0500, att...@torbsd.org wrote:
> >Synopsis:smtpd fails to start on 10 Feb 2018 snapshot
> >Category:
> >Environment:
> System : OpenBSD 6.2
> Details : OpenBSD 6.2-current (GENERIC.MP) #0: Sat Feb 10 00:05:49
> MST 2018
>
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 01:46:20PM +0100, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While playing with iscsid against a Synology NAS I noticed this reproducable
> crash.
> My iscsid.conf:
> --8<--
> target "LUN-1" {
> enabled
> normal
> targetaddr 192.168.178.9
>
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 02:07:40PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Hello Peter,
>
> On 18/01/15(Sun) 13:45, pe...@bsdly.net wrote:
> > >Synopsis: Crash triggered by ifconfig up on urtwn interface with post
> > >usb3 snapshots
> > >Category: amd64 kernel
> > >Environment:
> > System : O
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 01:14:45AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> While investigating a problem reported by Sevan Janiyan (where interface
> pppoe0 { passive } didn't get redisted) I ran into this reproducible
> crash.
>
> - start ospfd with a p2p interface (tried with pppoe and gif here).
> "pa
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 06:03:56PM +0100, Rafael Zalamena wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 04:14:44PM +0100, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> > Hi Rafael, others,
> >
> > It looks like your commit to ip_mroute.[ch] from January 11th broke
> > multicast forwarding. I found another thread that may suffer fro
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 08:32:42PM +0100, Bruno Flueckiger wrote:
> >Synopsis:iscsid(8) cannot connect to newer Linux targets
> >Category:system
> >Environment:
> System : OpenBSD 6.1
> Details : OpenBSD 6.1-beta (GENERIC.MP) #26: Wed Mar 15 22:22:37
> MDT 2017
>
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 06:14:50PM +0100, Rafael Zalamena wrote:
> I found a problem in the routing socket interface address install message.
> This issue only happens when installing IPv4 addresses on interfaces
> without specifying a prefix.
>
> e.g. ifconfig vether0 1.1.1.1
>
> The command abo
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 10:40:12AM -0600, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Mar 2017, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> ...
> > > I've made a diff that fixes this problem for me. I just moved the mask
> > > calculation to somewhere before rt_ifa_addlocal(), which is the f
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 02:30:48PM +0100, Pier Carlo Chiodi wrote:
>
> >Synopsis: can't rewrite NEXT_HOP for IPv6 routes
> >Category: user
> >Environment:
> System : OpenBSD 6.0
> Details : OpenBSD 6.0 (GENERIC) #2148: Tue Jul 26 12:55:20 MDT 2016
>
You need to disable pipex and then it works.
I had this issue for a long time and it seems to be ppp compression of
multicast UDP packets that cause unaligned UDP packets to happen.
Fixing this is far from trivial but I also never spent a lot of time on
it.
On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 03:03:15PM +0200
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 04:47:13PM +0200, Andrei-Marius Radu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've noticed that when running ping or traceroute with the -V option
> the DNS lookup still occurs in routing table 0. When ping or traceroute
> are run via route -Tx exec then the DNS lookup will happen in that
> res
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 03:54:38PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 11:33:08AM +, Gerlach, Hendrik wrote:
> > A possible fix maybe would calling m_free(opts) (if opts != NULL) after
> > calling icmp_send()
>
> As the options are not allocated in icmp_send() I think
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 07:12:39PM +, Aaron A. Glenn wrote:
>
> Experiencing an odd issue with only IPv6 sessions, on snapshots from Sept. 9th
> or later. I have 46 other instances running snapshots from Aug 30th to Sept.
> 3rd with IPv6 sessions working as expected.
>
> Please let me know wh
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 10:31:42AM +, Aaron A. Glenn wrote:
> * Claudio Jeker [2018-09-19 09:15]:
> > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 07:12:39PM +, Aaron A. Glenn wrote:
> > >
> > > Sep 18 19:06:10 nairobi bgpd[92056]: startup
> > > Sep 18 19:06:10 nairobi bgp
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 01:45:03PM +, Aaron A. Glenn wrote:
> * Theo de Raadt [2018-09-19 11:34]:
> >
> > Repeat the test please.
>
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x0bcf682ccf80 in memcpy (dst0=0x7f7ec304, src0=0xbceff4c9ffd,
> length=4)
> at /usr/src/lib/libc/string/memcpy.c:97
> #1 0x0b
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 01:45:03PM +, Aaron A. Glenn wrote:
> * Theo de Raadt [2018-09-19 11:34]:
> >
> > Repeat the test please.
>
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x0bcf682ccf80 in memcpy (dst0=0x7f7ec304, src0=0xbceff4c9ffd,
> length=4)
> at /usr/src/lib/libc/string/memcpy.c:97
> #1 0x0b
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 08:14:09PM +0200, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> Jon Williams(j...@jonwillia.ms) on 2018.09.25 16:51:25 -0400:
> > >Synopsis: Newly connected rtlabel networks are not advertised by bgpd
> > >Category: system
> > >Environment:
> > System : OpenBSD 6.3
> > Details : O
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 04:57:02PM -0300, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 26/09/18(Wed) 15:56, Élie Bouttier wrote:
> > On 9/26/18 12:42 PM, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > On 26/09/18(Wed) 11:59, e...@bouttier.eu wrote:
> > >>> Synopsis: Page fault in rt_setgwroute triggered by n
On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 02:44:30PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 02:06:42PM +0200, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 12:36:50PM +0200, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> > > > > about:config network.http.keep-alive.timeout 115
> > > > >
> > > > > So I think we should
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 03:54:15PM +0200, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
> Hello, just noticed that.
>
> in pf.conf:
>
> table bgp-spamd-block persists
>
>
> in bgpd.conf
>
> spamdAS="65066"
> AS 65077
> fib-update no # Mandatory, to not update the local routing table
> #log updates
>
> group "sp
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 03:20:59AM -0700, Anthony J. Bentley wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have httpd running two servers on two different ports:
>
> server "a" {
> listen on * port 8080
> root "/foo"
> }
>
> server "b" {
> listen on * port 8081
>
On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 09:01:06AM +, Tom Smyth wrote:
> just to confim
> im running 6.4 GENERIC.MP#364 amd64
> On Sun, 18 Nov 2018 at 08:58, Tom Smyth wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> > I was configuring an openbsd 6.4 bgpd router using the
> > /etc/examples/bgpd.conf as a template
> >
> > If you comm
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 06:06:05PM +0100, mb...@mbuhl.me wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> the following change lead to a kernerl panic after running
> /usr/src/regress/usr.sbin/bgpd/integrationtests/network_statement.sh
>
> https://cvsweb.openbsd.org/src/sys/net/route.c?rev=1.381&content-type=text/x-cvswe
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 10:10:26PM +0100, Pierre Emeriaud wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As explain in another mail to bugs@ ("rcctl issue with rdomains"), my
> shell is spawn from a sshd running in rtable 1.
>
> lg(rdomain1)$ id -R
> 1
>
> I can't however use `ping -V` to set the rtable I'm interested in:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 11:27:40PM +0100, Pierre Emeriaud wrote:
> Hello Claudio,
>
> Le lun. 18 mars 2019 à 23:07, Claudio Jeker a écrit :
> >
> > > lg(rdomain1)$ doas ping -V0 1.1.1.1
> > > ping: setsockopt SO_RTABLE: Operation not permitted
> >
> >
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 09:28:01AM +0100, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> Ted Unangst(t...@tedunangst.com) on 2019.03.18 23:11:24 -0400:
> > Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > > Ping is a bit of a special case since it runs with user _ping when started
> > > as root. So by the time the
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 04:29:58PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 04:13:37PM +0100, Florian Obser wrote:
>
> >
> > No idea how to reproduce this, I'm just running an httpd with debug
> > symbols and kern.nosuidcoredump=3
> > Pretty sure this is the crash various people mumb
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 12:30:19AM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 11:18:29AM +0100, p...@delphinusdns.org wrote:
> > >Synopsis: session uptime is wrong
> > >Category: system
> > >Environment:
> > System : OpenBSD 7.0
> > Details : OpenBSD 7.0 (GENERIC.MP) #
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 01:40:34PM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 09:30:13AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > > Index: sbin/ifconfig/ifconfig.c
> > > ===
> > > RCS file: /cvs/
On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 12:09:48PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 08:54:51AM +, Lucas wrote:
> > panic: kernel diagnostic assertion "!ISSET(rt->rt_flags, RTF_UP)" failed:
> > file "/usr/src/sys/net/route.c", line 506
>
> During my performance tests I got the same trac
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 02:14:40PM +0100, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a program with unexpected unveil violation.
>
> I put the whole / read-only, and next few programs executable (the
> purpose is to restrict the executable files to only a small set).
>
> The directory containing th
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 09:26:32AM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> I don't understand.
>
> Why do you think the directory should be visible?
unveil("/", "r") should make everything visible for read. So the stat
should not fail. The fact that /usr/bin is a special snowflake because of
the extra unve
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 04:43:13PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 02:14:40PM +0100, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a program with unexpected unveil violation.
> >
> > I put the whole / read-only, and next few programs
On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 09:56:47AM +0100, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 01:57:01PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 04:43:13PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 02:14:40PM +0100, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> > &g
On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 10:21:04AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 09:56:47AM +0100, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 01:57:01PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 04:43:13PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > >
On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 09:12:32AM +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 08:04:11PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 04:21:13PM +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> > > > > - if (len <= tail - head) {
> > > > > - /* there's
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 02:28:15AM +0100, Tilo Stritzky wrote:
> On 15/02/22 01:54 Tilo Stritzky wrote:
> >
> > I've got another one with a homebuild from -current as of 2022-02-13,
> > will put traces in another mail.
>
> And here we go.
> This is from the crash dump, I lost the console log on
On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 10:51:13AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2022/03/19 19:14, David Gwynne wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 12:05:16PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > > This should not be done in applications. The kernel must do it. It means
> > > the current kernel code is worng.
>
On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 12:27:43PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 10:51:13AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2022/03/19 19:14, David Gwynne wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 12:05:16PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > > > This should not
On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 10:57:18PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 12:53:54PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 12:27:43PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 10:51:13AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 05:00:19PM +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-03-29 at 20:43 +0100, Raf Czlonka wrote:
> > > Synopsis: ldap(1) search doesn't seem to working properly
> > > Category: system
> > > Environment:
> > System : OpenBSD 7.1
> > Details : OpenBSD 7.1-be
On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 12:38:56AM +0200, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> >
> > Yes. It is similar.
> >
> > I have read the whole mail thread and the final fix got commited.
> > But it looks incomplete, pf is still sleeping.
> >
> > Hrvoje, can you run the tests again that triggered th
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:21:02AM +0200, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 06:01:07PM +0300, Barbaros Bilek wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I was using veb (veb+vlan+ixl) interfaces quite stable since 6.9.
> > My system ran as a firewall under OpenBSD 6.9 and 7.0 quite st
On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 09:58:09AM +0200, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> >
> > Can we limit the number of span ports per bridge to a small number so that
> > the instead of a heap object for the SLIST a simple stack array of
> > MAX_SPAN_PORTS pointers could be used?
> >
> > Who needs m
On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 10:29:57AM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 09:58:09AM +0200, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > >
> > > Can we limit the number of span ports per bridge to a small number so that
> > > the inste
On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 11:01:21AM +0200, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> Hello Hrvoje,
>
> thank you for testing.
> On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 10:40:28AM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> > On 10.5.2022. 22:55, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> > > Yes. It is similar.
> > >
> > > I have read the whole mail thre
On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 12:19:46PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 08:07:09PM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> > On 12.5.2022. 20:04, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> > > On 12.5.2022. 16:22, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> > >> On 12.5.2022. 14:48, Claudio Je
On Sat, May 14, 2022 at 12:41:00AM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 05:53:27PM +0200, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> > at this point we hold a NET_LOCK(). So basically if there won't
> > be enough memory we might start sleeping waiting for memory
> > while we will b
On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 12:07:01PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2022/05/29 14:20, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> > On Sun, 29 May 2022 at 13:44, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2022/05/29 19:08, Florian Obser wrote:
> > > > On 2022-05-29 12:27 -04, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> > >
> > > Are you p
On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 12:03:06AM +0200, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'll commit one-liner diff on Tuesday morning (Jun 6th) Prague time without
> explicit OK, unless there will be no objection.
The diff is OK claudio@.
> regards
> sashan
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 05, 2022 at 09:44:45AM
On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 11:43:50AM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 at 10:52, Crystal Kolipe
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 10:40:47AM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> > > I'm trying to use <> to auto partition a disk
> > > with most of the disk assigned to / but also with
On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 10:08:53AM +, alex.vatche...@gmail.com wrote:
> >Synopsis:httpd+slowcgi sometimes wrongly interpret next request
> >Category:daemon
> >Environment:
> System : OpenBSD 7.1
> Details : OpenBSD 7.1 (GENERIC.MP) #3: Sun May 15 10:27:01 MDT 2022
>
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 09:06:03AM +0200, Omar Polo wrote:
> Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 10:08:53AM +, alex.vatche...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > >Synopsis:httpd+slowcgi sometimes wrongly interpret next request
> > > >Category:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 02:00:39PM +0300, Alexey Vatchenko wrote:
> > On 10 Aug 2022, at 16:26, Alexey Vatchenko wrote:
> >> On 10 Aug 2022, at 10:06, Omar Polo wrote:
> >>
> >> I experienced a similar issue with both slowcgi and gotwebd (a fastcgi
> >> application.) Can you please try the diff
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 11:23:57AM +0300, Mikhail wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 09:09:41AM +0300, Mikhail wrote:
> > On the latest snapshot my laptop has stopped to automatically turn off
> > the display after timeout, it was fine about 3 weeks ago.
>
> Chrome is one to blame:
>
> https://bugs
On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 07:48:30AM +, Lévai, Dániel wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> I've upgraded to 6.5 and if possible it has gotten worse. Now it gets
> unresponsive after ~half a day. With 6.4 I could get away with one
> reboot per day but it seems I'm going to need two or more with 6.5.
> Does
On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 07:58:04PM +, Lévai, Dániel wrote:
> So it seems that by flushing the pass/block rules from the bridge(4) the
> leak has been plugged on this router.
>
Please try the following diff. This is fixing a obvious mem leak in one
special case (this may be why you did not not
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 09:49:36PM +0200, a...@gmx.com wrote:
> >Synopsis:Kernel stop booting: usbd_free_xfer xfer=0xfd82202daa50 not
> >free
> >Category:kernel panic
> >Environment:
> System : OpenBSD 6.5
> Details : OpenBSD 6.5 (GENERIC.MP) #1: Mon May 27 18:27:5
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 01:27:44PM +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote:
>
>
> On 8/13/19 1:23 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2019/08/13 12:20, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >> On 2019/08/13 11:30, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> >>> Found this one by because snmpd returns an invalid varbind on my laptop.
>
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 01:43:13PM +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> On 8/13/19 1:40 PM, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 01:27:44PM +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 8/13/19 1:23 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >>
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 01:31:16PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2019/08/13 13:29, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2019/08/13 13:50, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > > In that case you want to use ifi_iqdrops in struct if_data.
> > > So maybe something like the appended d
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 12:55:02AM -0700, Sacha wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> first of all sorry if this bug report is not complete, the issue is on our
> production firewalls and each test cut all our AS network, we have to be in
> the datacenter to go further.
This is not good.
> We have 2 firewall
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:17:02AM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> Hi Otto,
>
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 10:58:24AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> | I could * this has to do with the logging changes. Previously, debug
> | messages could disappear because of wrong logging setup. In non -v
> | mode, onl
1 - 100 of 202 matches
Mail list logo
