Please try -current - I believe you are hitting stuff that has been fixed
there.
On 6 April 2010 10:18, Sergiu Partenie wrote:
>>Synopsis: Crash with original 4.6 GENERIC.MP macppc on XServe G4
>>Category: powerpc
>>Environment:
>System : OpenBSD 4.6
>Details : OpenBSD 4
thanks. probably enough. ill go find it :)
> On Jul 1, 2020, at 18:33, sma...@sdf.org wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Synopsis:uvm_wait_pla calls bufbackoff(NULL,4). It *(NULL)s.
>> Category:kernel
>> Environment:
>System : OpenBSD 6.7
>Details : OpenBSD 6.7 (GENERIC.MP) #1: Sat May
>
> FWIW, I have an x1 gen3 wich is essentially the same hardware. I see
> no such issues, but I mostly run chrome and I do have 8G of memory.
>
> To me this sounds like you are running out of memory. The DRM code is
> supposed to give up any spare graphics buffers when asked to do so by
> th
Hi Julien,
This is a known issue with 6.8 that is fixed in current.
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 03:57:52PM +0100, Julien Robert wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm working to upgrade apache reverse proxy server running in OpenBSD 6.5
> to latest version 6.8 doing from scratch install.
> But in the 6.8 , the
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 01:54:53PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2020/12/04 12:21, avv. Nicola Dell'Uomo wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > when I try to verify an email in 6.8 GENERIC.MP#206 amd64, I get the
> > following error:
> >
> > openssl smime -verify -in /path/to/file.eml
> > Verification fail
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 04:45:32PM +0100, Solene Rapenne wrote:
> Hello,
>
> it seems www.openbsd.org is down since 14h46 UTC
> If I remember correctly you are the right person to tell about it.
>
> Regards
> Sol??ne
Yes, It appears that httpd ran low on file descriptors, and decided to fix
th
estart
every hour to restart it if it dies feels like the garbage I have
to do on linux.
>
> Bob Beck wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 04:45:32PM +0100, Solene Rapenne wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > it seems
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 05:47:36PM +0100, Florian Obser wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 09:40:51AM -0700, Bob Beck wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 04:45:32PM +0100, Solene Rapenne wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > it seems www.openbsd.org i
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 05:56:28PM +0100, Florian Obser wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 09:52:03AM -0700, Bob Beck wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 05:47:36PM +0100, Florian Obser wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 09:40:51AM -0700, Bob Beck
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 10:28 AM Todd C. Miller wrote:
>
> On Thu, 21 Nov 2019 11:52:53 +0100, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
>
> > On OpenBSD 6.6 amd64 patch 006, i get peculiar results from readlink(1)
> > with arguments -f with a symlink to /
> >
> > $ readlink -f /
> > /
> >
> > $ ln -s / test; readlin
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 3:53 AM Raimo Niskanen wrote:
>
> On OpenBSD 6.6 amd64 patch 006, i get peculiar results from readlink(1)
> with arguments -f with a symlink to /
>
> $ readlink -f /
> /
>
> $ ln -s / test; readlink -f test; rm test
> readlink: test: Is a directory
>
> $ readlink -f /.
> /
makes sense to me and has my ok. could we see if bluhm@ can be sure this
still works with his workload?
On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 08:43 Todd C. Miller wrote:
> Here is a minimal fix that only addresses the tight CPU loop in
> softdep_process_worklist(). It will exit the loop if we cannot
> make
What makes you believe your certificate failure is due to the wildcard DNSname
and not due to some other reason (like the certificate not being trusted, or
failing a critical extension, etc.)
A quick scan of the wildcard matching code in smtpd looks correct to me, but
it won't get in there if t
I found another place to connect to it from and dumped the cert.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 10:50:11AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> David, you should put an unfiltered reproducer on the internet.
>
> > I can't connect to that host from where I am, obviously it does some
> > sort of port 25 filter
will suggest my patch to get that debug line tho :)
Cheers
-Bob
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 01:01:16PM -0400, David Goerger wrote:
> Friday, 20200410 10:48-0600, Bob Beck wrote:
> >
> > What makes you believe your certificate failure is due to the wildcard
> > DNSname
>
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 02:41:22PM -0400, David Goerger wrote:
> Friday, 20200410 12:04-0600, Bob Beck wrote:
> >
> > So doing a little digging:
> >
> > obtuse1# dig hostedmail.com mx
> > ; <<>> dig 9.10.8-P1 <<>> hostedmail.com mx
> &
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 11:18:04AM +0100, Helmut Kiessling BT wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I have a strange CA certificate (GoDaddy) serial number issue after upgraded
> one of our servers into OpenBSD 6.6 see below:
>
>
>
> In OpenBSD 6.4 serial number is:
>
>
>
> # openssl version
>
> LibreS
Rupert, please go away.
You are not useful, and you're being an asshole.
You belong in a different community.
Please go rant somewhere else about how horrible we are,
and stop abusing our volunteer developers with your
abuse.
-Bob
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 08:09:44AM +, Rupert Gallaghe
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 11:07:12PM +0200, Dawid Czelu??niak wrote:
> After changing permissions of /var/mail directory to 755:
>
> $ chmod 755 /var/mail
>
> everything is fine and seteuid(2) is not called:
> 92121 lockspool NAMI "/var/mail/root.lock"
> 92121 lockspool RET unlink 0
> 92121 l
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 04:05:47PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > + if (pledge("id flock stdio rpath wpath getpw cpath fattr", NULL) ==
> > -1)
>
> Please wait for other pledge people to respond.
>
> But re-order. Add the new things to the end.
>
Ack
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 04:15:24PM -0600, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> On Mon, 25 May 2020 16:04:25 -0600, Bob Beck wrote:
>
> > getlock()'s behaviour changes in the case of a writeable mail spool. if we
> > want to keep supporting this, I we can modify the pledge as fol
ok beck@ for todd’s diff to remove support
> On May 26, 2020, at 03:20, Dawid Czeluśniak wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 04:15:24PM -0600, Todd C. Miller wrote:
>> I thought we decided not to adjust the pledge when I brought it up
>> last time. Here's the diff I had in my tree to remove sup
May 2 kernel. This may have since been fixed, and I will be sysupgrading.
Just recording here in case it hasn't been. lots of stuff in fltamapcopy
when I broke into ddb
ddb{0}> ps
PID TID PPIDUID S FLAGS WAIT COMMAND
32360 384138 87480 0 20x100010
I'm replying on behalf of Philip, who is email challenged a the momemet..
"Yeah, combining -url with any of -host, -port, or -path should simply be
an error, as -url specifies all three of them (plus http vs https).
What's happening is that with -url we have to parse the argument into
allocate
Really, if the project is not operating them I don't think we should
be sanctioning any sort of third party site, or somehow adding some
sort of legitimacy to it by suggesting people go there, or cranking up
the page rank of some torrent site by linking it.
We link the stuff the project sanctions
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> london 440Mbit/sec
Stuart.. Allow me to express this thought in the kindest way
possible.. I hate you.. you bastard... :)
This actually should be fixed..
On 22 May 2014 19:55, "Nick Holland" wrote:
> On 05/21/14 20:01, Zen Floater wrote:
> > I am a learning student and was going through the FAQ pages
> > which lead me to reading man pages and eventually man 1 intro.
> >
> > http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq2.html
> >
>
Sounds like whatever you fed it from (not knowing what you are using
to jam stuff in there)
had some sort of issues. File's corrupt, you can dump it out textually
with spamdb and re-create it,
or blow it away and start over.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 7:17 AM, Kamil Andrusz wrote:
> Hi list!
>
> I’
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 08:27:55AM -0400, Jiri B wrote:
> I changed partition id from A6 to NTFS of running OpenBSD
> 5.5 (16.-18.6. amd64 snapshot) and after a while OS freezed.
I think doing that is unadvised. Right up there with
rm -rf /
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/rsd0c
Driving car containing ru
Indeed. Understand that patches are signed using an offline key. It
does not speak to the internet. We are not invoking
a manual process to change a minor typo, and have even one person lose
any sleep over repatching systems because
the patch signature changed. While I realize it may offend you s
This will certainly be because it's not tty pledged, and it will ask for
the password for his private key
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 12:51 AM, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 12:45:10AM +0100, Xavier Sanchez wrote:
> > >Synopsis: libressl aborted when starting ocsp with a pas
just committed the fix.
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 1:10 AM, Bob Beck wrote:
> This will certainly be because it's not tty pledged, and it will ask for
> the password for his private key
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 12:51 AM, Sebastien Marie
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri,
yeah, do it that way
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 7:00 AM, Joel Sing wrote:
> On Monday 03 April 2017 11:37:19 Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2017/04/03 11:19, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > That format string doesn't show up in nginx at all. But it is in
> > > /usr/src/lib/libcrypto/asn1/t_x509.c. Lo
Please give me some details of your setup to reproduce this. (since I
don't use "resflash")
On Sat, Sep 15, 2018 at 12:35 PM Jarkko Oranen wrote:
>
> As the summary says, this is rather easy to reproduce.
>
> I use resflash to build myself router images based on OpenBSD. Today I
> built an image
"Resflash is not a
> > > supported OpenBSD configuration. Please do not email misc@ asking
> > > for
> > > help. If you have a question or a bug to report, please post to the
> > > mailing list, submit an issue on GitLab, or email me directly."
> > >
This is fixed, I had the wrong hash NID in the legacy sigalgs.
Interesting fact: when the client sends sigalgs in order of
preference, mircosoft processes all of them for every cipher type, and
therefore chooses the weakest ;)
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 4:28 AM Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> On 2018/1
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 7:11 AM Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> On 2018/11/13 14:41, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 11:28:23AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > On 2018/11/13 09:37, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Moving the thread to bugs@ has it seems to be
We should clarify the man page. trying to think about wording.
On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 01:10 Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > solene@ reported on ports an error with unveil(2) on creating
> > subdirectories on previously not existent directory, for a port she
> > tried to unveiled.
>
> Step back for a m
> Benjamin Baier wrote:
>
> > using openat(2) after unveil(2) seems to misbehave.
> > Isolated test case below. I expect the code to succesfully end with
> > exit code 0 but it fails with exit code 6.
> >
> > Greetings Ben
> >
> >
> > #include
> > #include
> > #include
> > #include
> > #in
> On Sep 26, 2023, at 11:33 PM, stephane Tranchemer wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Another trouble I found, maybe it's my conf again(?) is that I am unable to
>>> use a section to call out to define common options for x509extensions.
>>> Example, this does not work:
>>>
>>> [ ca ] default_ca = Domain-CA [
Then the installer is working as intended. "must be at least this tall to
ride".
Please go install ubuntu.
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Dev Nul wrote:
> I'm a new user, and I'm screwed.
> Install5.1 cd can't set up my wifi and can't find the necessary *.tgz's on
> the boot cd.
> Making an im
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Christian Weisgerber
wrote:
> Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
>> ntpd is never going to be able to correct these large offets within
>> reasonable
>> time. It was designed to adjust clocks that have offsets of a couple of
>> minutes. Seeing the messages in syslog clear in
I bet you're using chrome. This appears to be a bug in chrome - it is
not parsing the relative url "../anoncvs.html" correctly. If you look
at in firefox it works just fine.
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Luke Duguid wrote:
> * http://www.openbsd.org/faq/anoncvs.html link broken, referenced fro
Aha nope, it's the double slashes - that breaks the relative URL
stuff. it's not chrome.
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 4:50 AM, Bob Beck wrote:
> I bet you're using chrome. This appears to be a bug in chrome - it is
> not parsing the relative url "../anoncvs.html"
Dude. There are many old bugs in there to find. Trust me. Start reading
code instead of shining turds
On Nov 21, 2012 5:41 AM, "Otto Moerbeek" wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 02:28:01PM +0100, Cl??ment B??sch wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 02:19:57PM +0100, Peter wrote:
> > > Yes, I did.
Take this to misc@ please. It is not a bug.
On Nov 21, 2012 1:56 PM, "xSAPPYx" wrote:
> Interesting post talking about two spacing recently:
>
> http://stevelosh.com/blog/2012/10/why-i-two-space/
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 9:13 AM, m brandenberg wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 21 Nov 2012, Peter wrote:
I can see it fine. null pointer deref in cpu_switchto during a sys_select.
tmux appears to be on the cpu in the ps listing.
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 8:44 PM, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado <
i...@juanfra.info> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 03:50:42AM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> > On 29 Dec
This conversation is not appropriate for bugs@.. All of you who know
better, stop feeding the fucking trolls.
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 1:02 AM, Jorge Armendariz
wrote:
> On 04/23/2013 08:06 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 19:02, Jorge Armendariz wrote:
>>
>>> It would also be nic
OK, I've used this machine constantly without issues from the X
server. I recently rebooted *after* having booted windows
(which I don't do that often on this machine) and the X server segfaulted.
Attached is the relevant bits.
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream
Geoffrey, I have security concerns about every CA in the list, not just CACert.
That notwithstanding, CACert has not proven to be "less crap" than any
of the others
that have, IMO, plenty of issues of their own. I don't buy the
argument that a non-profit
CA hasn't signed up and paid for consorti
If a users wants this they are free to add the IP address to alloweddomains,
Most users have absolutely no desire to accept mail directed to an IP
address, so I don't
believe this is a serious issue, other an allowing in spam addressed
to the ip address. Users
of the alloweddomains file want expli
> which can be easily inadvertently configured to trap legitimate
> abuse reports from ever reaching the mail server.
Please find me more thant 10 legitimate abuse reports that come from
real human fingers
and are not generated by some ridiculous "intrustion dectection" or
auto-mail-to-abuse@
The following reply was made to PR kernel/6473; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Bob Beck
To: s...@spacehopper.org
Cc: gn...@openbsd.org, Artur Grabowski ,
David Gwynne , Theo de Raadt ,
"Thordur I. Bjornsson" ,
Owain Ainsworth
Subject: Re: kernel/6473: i/o s
> Though I do wonder if the spamlogd received to whitelist should be
> seperated from the sent to/manual whitelist and the blacklist
> (spamd.conf) should override the received to whitelist in case an
> update to the blacklist comes in after an auto whitelist. Or
> alternatively with this change, i
On 23 February 2011 20:52, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Feb 23, 2011, at 6:27 PM, Silvio Bandeira
> wrote:
>> so how to include those outputs when bug reporting?
>
> I used to use a pen and paper, copying down the output, and then typing it in.
> Cheap cell phone cameras mean it's usually easier t
Build a kernel with the attached patch. Does it fix your problem?
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had
a name of patch]
On 18 November 2011 08:38, Dipl.-Ing. Markus Wawersich
wrote:
> Dear "bugs"
> dear Mike,
>
> I had discovered a few days ago a bug in OpenBSD, and spent many hours
trying
> to isolate the issue.
> I had mailed you a detailed error description, but I've only received a
brief
> refusal:
>
> "i'm ba
On 18 November 2011 08:50, Bob Beck wrote:
> Build a kernel with the attached patch. Does it fix your problem?
>
oops. damn mime, sorry.
http://bofh.ucs.ualberta.ca/beck/vfs_cache.diff
Please get a full traceback for us. Without that your report is
fascinating, but we probably
can't find the bug.
On 24 November 2011 15:53, Olivier Burelli wrote:
> hello,
>
> sorry for my bad english.
>
> after 3 upgrade succesfull i decided a fresh install for OpenBSD-5.0 on
> my PC :
>
> Inte
No Jummo, and fix looks right. Thank you..
On 30 November 2011 08:54, Jummo wrote:
> Anything wrong with my previous mail?
This seems to be a side effect of /usr/share/man/whatis.db
dissapearing from base in snaps. I'll check with ingo and see what
we want to do about that.
On 12 January 2012 07:26, Alexey Suslikov wrote:
> hello bugs@
>
> http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi says Cannot open whatis
> database for
61 matches
Mail list logo
