IP packets with Router Alert option are not forwarded by bridge

on bridge interface, but are not present on egress port. Thanks. -- Best regards, Alexander Okonnikov [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a name of sendbug]

Re: IP packets with Router Alert option are not forwarded by bridge

Hello Stuart, I'm sorry for disturbance. Indeed, PF was the cause of dropping packets with IP option. Thank you! 2014-07-17 14:56 GMT+04:00 Stuart Henderson : > On 2014/07/17 14:43, Alexander Okonnikov wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Description: > > There i

Problem with VLAN tagging of packets

Hello, Look at attachment for description of the problem. Thank you. -- Best regards, Alexander Okonnikov Hello, It seems that new bug has been introduced in OpenBSD 5.6. Two hosts are connected to each other via link. Each host is configured with VLAN 100 on this link, which is bridged

Re: Problem with VLAN tagging of packets

Stuart, thank you a lot. 2014-11-16 0:35 GMT+03:00 Stuart Henderson : > On 2014/11/16 00:11, Alexander Okonnikov wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Look at attachment for description of the problem. > > Try the patch in Rafael Zalamena's recent post to the "VLAN

PF doesn't apply newly assigned address for NAT

Hi, According to pf.conf man: "When the interface name is surrounded by parentheses, the rule is automatically updated whenever the interface changes its address. The ruleset does not need to be reloaded. This is especially useful with NAT." In fact it is not true. Moreover, even reloading o

PF doesn't apply newly assigned address for NAT

Hi, According to pf.conf man: "When the interface name is surrounded by parentheses, the rule is automatically updated whenever the interface changes its address. The ruleset does not need to be reloaded. This is especially useful with NAT." In fact it is not true. Moreover, even reloading o

Re: PF doesn't apply newly assigned address for NAT

., в 10:35, Alexandr Nedvedicky написал(а): > > Hello, > > On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 01:01:30AM +0300, Alexander Okonnikov wrote: >> Hi Alexandr, >> >> The fact that new IP address to be used for new sessions makes sense. >> Though, such behavior could pose pro

'default' in numeric mode of netstat output

To move issue with 'default' in netstat output into separate thread. It seems that in OpenBSD 'default' is just alias for 0.0.0.0/0 (as expected). For example, I can create just another 0.0.0.0/0 route, and it will be displayed as 'default' as well. obsd-02# cat /etc/mygate 100.64.5.254 obsd-0

Re: 'default' in numeric mode of netstat output

dcast 172.16.0.255 obsd-02# > 4 янв. 2024 г., в 12:41, Solène Rapenne написал(а): > > Le 04/01/2024 à 10:32, Alexander Okonnikov a écrit : >> To move issue with 'default' in netstat output into separate thread. >> It seems that in OpenBSD 'default' is just alias f