Hello,
I have an issue which may be similar to that described by Olivier in
the other chain of email on Wireguard. I was not sure whether to just
chip in and add information or open up a new email chain to not pollute
the other discussion. Apologies if that's the wrong choice.
Since the upgrad
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 11:36:17AM +0200, Janne Johansson wrote:
> > > >Description:
> > > On a same filestem, /tmp or /var in www pages perhaps or perhaps
> > > even / if they get that deep,
> > > the risk exists that a user can archive a file away even though
> > > they don't
Hello,
Late to the convo and new to openbsd.. I was browsing the bugs here on openbsd
and found this thread.. this might not help but i just got this lenovo l440 and
took a snapshot so i can make sure the laptop works fine..
Install went fine but as soon as i opened up firefox in i3 or cwm it c
Hello,
I have tested all versions of OpenBSD/sparc64 since 6.2 on
qemu-system-sparc64 (qemu 8.5 and 9.0.2 used for this) with the
following syntax:
qemu-system-sparc64 -machine sun4u,usb=off -smp
1,sockets=1,cores=1,threads=1 -rtc base=utc -m 1024 -drive
file=fs.qcow2,if=none,id=drive-
On 24/10/2024 21:02, Miod Vallat wrote:
6.2-6.9 install and boot fine. 7.0 will neither boot bsd.rd nor bsd. 7.1 had
trouble installing but booted, 7.2 installs and boots fine. From 7.3 upwards
bsd.rd boots and you can install but bsd will not boot and the emulator
crashes. People on #openbsd o
On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 11:36:17AM +0200, Janne Johansson wrote:
> > >Description:
> > On a same filestem, /tmp or /var in www pages perhaps or perhaps
> > even / if they get that deep,
> > the risk exists that a user can archive a file away even though
> > they don't have permiss
Miod Vallat wrote:
> > 6.2-6.9 install and boot fine. 7.0 will neither boot bsd.rd nor bsd. 7.1 had
> > trouble installing but booted, 7.2 installs and boots fine. From 7.3 upwards
> > bsd.rd boots and you can install but bsd will not boot and the emulator
> > crashes. People on #openbsd over on
On 2024-10-24 09:18 +02, i...@callpeter.tel wrote:
>>Fix:
> not provided. It's up to the maintainer.
Feel free to come back without the shitty attitude.
--
In my defence, I have been left unsupervised.
> >Description:
> On a same filestem, /tmp or /var in www pages perhaps or perhaps even
> / if they get that deep,
> the risk exists that a user can archive a file away even though they
> don't have permissions
> to that file. It allows at least a "backup" of non-user own
On 2024/10/23 22:36, Oliver Schweger wrote:
> I’ll test your recommendations over the next few days, but I don’t expect
> -tcplro to make any difference, as wireguard only uses udp.
However TCP can be carried inside wg. And some things are carried from
an "inner" packet to a packet carried in som
>Synopsis: dig needs update for HTTPS(65) RR's
>Category: user
>Environment:
System : OpenBSD 7.5
Details : OpenBSD 7.5 (GENERIC.MP) #2: Mon Sep 16 07:59:35 MDT 2024
r...@syspatch-75-arm64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/arm64/compile/GENER
11 matches
Mail list logo
