On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 12:12:41PM +0200, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:
>
> >Synopsis:uvn_flush: obj=0xfd8459e86108, offset=0x2af. error
> >during pageout.
> >Category:vmd
> >Environment:
> System : OpenBSD 7.6
> Details : OpenBSD 7.6-beta (GENERIC.MP) #103: Mon
On Sat, Sep 07, 2024 at 01:38:08PM +0300, Alexander Shursha wrote:
> I was wrong, TSO has no effect.
Good. Then this report makes more sense.
> ping6 2a09:5302:::1
> PING 2a09:5302:::1 (2a09:5302:::1): 56 data bytes
> ^C
> --- 2a09:5302:::1 ping statistics ---
> 4 packets transm
Alexander Bluhm writes:
> On Sat, Sep 07, 2024 at 01:38:08PM +0300, Alexander Shursha wrote:
>> I was wrong, TSO has no effect.
>
> Good. Then this report makes more sense.
>
>> ping6 2a09:5302:::1
>> PING 2a09:5302:::1 (2a09:5302:::1): 56 data bytes
>> ^C
>> --- 2a09:5302:::1 p
On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 03:27:30PM +0300, kekek wrote:
> Alexander Bluhm writes:
> > Then do some tcpdump to see if neigbor discovery packets go in or
> > out. tcpdump -i pflog0 may also help debugging.
> tcpdump -ni vio0 host fe80::5054:ff:fecd:f988
> tcpdump: listening on vio0, link-type EN10MB
Alexander Bluhm writes:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 03:27:30PM +0300, kekek wrote:
> Three possibiliites
> 1. solicitation gets lost
> 2. no advertisement generated
> 3. advertisement gets lost
7.3:
ifconfig vio0
vio0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
lladdr 52:54:00:f1:31:af
index 1 priority
Alexander Bluhm writes:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 03:27:30PM +0300, kekek wrote:
> Three possibiliites
> 1. solicitation gets lost
> 2. no advertisement generated
> 3. advertisement gets lost
7.3:
ifconfig vio0
vio0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
lladdr 52:54:00:f1:31:af
index 1 priority
On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 04:57:42PM +0300, kekek wrote:
> Alexander Bluhm writes:
> > Next step is to tcpdump the tap device on the qemu host. This
> > should answer in which case we run.
> This is a hosting service, I don't have access to qemu.
Is it the same problem as in this thread?
https://m
Alexander Bluhm writes:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 04:57:42PM +0300, kekek wrote:
> Is it the same problem as in this thread?
> https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-bugs&m=172581695605962&w=2
>
> Did you try IPv4?
IPv4 works fine.
--
Alexander Shursha
