Seems like you might want to use "return" on your block rule.
--
Sent from a phone, apologies for poor formatting.
On 10 December 2023 20:15:36 Luca Di Gregorio wrote:
Hi, in my /etc/pf.conf I have the line:
set skip on lo
That is why the rules of my previous email don't work.
If I comment
Hello,
On Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 03:10:02AM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 12:28:10AM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 02:07:06AM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> > > > > SLIST_ENTRY(pflow_softc) sc_next;
> > > >
> > > > This list is prot
Hi,
> On 11 Dec 2023, at 12:58, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
>
>on the other hand if there is a way to implement pflowif_list as lock-less
>(or move it ouf of NET_LOCK() scope), then this is a preferred way
>forward.
So, I’m going to commit the diff which turns pflowif_list into SMR l
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 02:47:49PM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On 11 Dec 2023, at 12:58, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> >
> >on the other hand if there is a way to implement pflowif_list as
> > lock-less
> >(or move it ouf of NET_LOCK() scope), then this is a preferred way
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 10:58:22AM +0100, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> dlg@ and I are basically trying to remove all NET_LOCK() operations from
> pf(4), because we don't want pf(4) to be playing with global NET_LOCK().
> all callers to pf(4) should either obtain NET_LOCK() in case they
Hello,
I just updated all my packages on both my OpenBSD 7.4-current systems
(also updated to the latest snapshot) and I notice that Firefox is not
launching. It spits out the following error when I launch it from the
terminal.
XPCOMGlueLoad error for file /usr/local/lib/firefox/libmozwayland.so.
Hi Claudio,
* Claudio Miranda wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just updated all my packages on both my OpenBSD 7.4-current systems
> (also updated to the latest snapshot) and I notice that Firefox is not
> launching. It spits out the following error when I launch it from the
> terminal.
>
> XPCOMGlueLoad e
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 8:39 AM Matthias Schmidt wrote:
>
> Hi Claudio,
>
> * Claudio Miranda wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I just updated all my packages on both my OpenBSD 7.4-current systems
> > (also updated to the latest snapshot) and I notice that Firefox is not
> > launching. It spits out the f
I've just tested with "block return" instead of "block drop".
The result is the same. In fact, in man pf.conf I see:
max number
Limits the number of concurrent states the rule may create.
When this limit is reached, further packets that would create
state are dropped until existing states
There is a working amd64 package from the previous bulk build at
https://spacehopper.org/mirrors/firefox-120.0.1.tgz
It is just from a backup of the normal packages not a local build, so
you should expect the signature will verify. You should be able to
install by downloading and "pkg_add -D insta
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 9:44 AM Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> There is a working amd64 package from the previous bulk build at
> https://spacehopper.org/mirrors/firefox-120.0.1.tgz
>
> It is just from a backup of the normal packages not a local build, so
> you should expect the signature will verify
11 matches
Mail list logo
