Re: ntpd constraint don't use v6 when v6 is only there after ntpd start-up

2023-11-29 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 08:49:55AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 04:19:07PM +0100, Paul de Weerd wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I have a few APU's I'm using to experiment with some stuff. I found all > > of them unable to sync with NTP because they don't have IPv4 > > conn

Re: ntpd constraint don't use v6 when v6 is only there after ntpd start-up

2023-11-29 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 11:57:15AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 08:49:55AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 04:19:07PM +0100, Paul de Weerd wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I have a few APU's I'm using to experiment with some stuff. I found

Re: kernel diagnostic assertion "st->timeout == PFTM_UNLINKED" failed: file "

2023-11-29 Thread Johan Huldtgren
hello, On 2023-11-04 15:26, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote: > Hello Johan, > > On Sat, Nov 04, 2023 at 10:01:06AM -0400, Johan Huldtgren wrote: > > hello, > > > > On 2023-11-03 19:10, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote: > > > Hello Johan, > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 12:27:53PM -0400, Johan Hul

Re: kernel diagnostic assertion "st->timeout == PFTM_UNLINKED" failed: file "

2023-11-29 Thread Alexandr Nedvedicky
Hello Johan, On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 11:24:59PM -0500, Johan Huldtgren wrote: > > so my machine paniced today, but the panic this time is completely different. > I don't know if it's related to this issue, the patch, or a completely new > issue, but I figured I'd start reporting it here. Unfortun