On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 12:07:51PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 11:31:33AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > On 29/06/23(Thu) 11:17, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > >
> > > iwm_intr already runs at IPL_NET. What else would be required?
> >
> > Are we sure all accesses to `ic
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 11:31:33AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 29/06/23(Thu) 11:17, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> >
> > iwm_intr already runs at IPL_NET. What else would be required?
>
> Are we sure all accesses to `ic_tree' are run under KERNEL_LOCK()+splnet()?
A quick look through net80211 d
On 29/06/23(Thu) 11:17, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 10:59:32AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > On 28/06/23(Wed) 15:47, Moritz Buhl wrote:
> > > Dear bugs@,
> > >
> > > with the following snapshot I had two panics on my x270 recently.
> >
> > This is a bug in iwm(4) suggesti
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 10:59:32AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 28/06/23(Wed) 15:47, Moritz Buhl wrote:
> > Dear bugs@,
> >
> > with the following snapshot I had two panics on my x270 recently.
>
> This is a bug in iwm(4) suggesting a missing SPL protection.
>
> > sysctl kern.version
> > k
On 28/06/23(Wed) 15:47, Moritz Buhl wrote:
> Dear bugs@,
>
> with the following snapshot I had two panics on my x270 recently.
This is a bug in iwm(4) suggesting a missing SPL protection.
> sysctl kern.version
> kern.version=OpenBSD 7.3-current (GENERIC.MP) #1256: Thu Jun 22 10:53:02 MDT
> 2023
