> From: Christopher Dimech
> Cc: bug-texinfo@gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2021 05:41:41 +0200
>
> > > make -C doc texinfo.pdf
> > > make: *** doc: No such file or directory. Stop.
> >
> > In what directory did you invoke that command? It should be invoked
> > in the texinfo-X.Y.Z directory create
> Sent: Friday, July 02, 2021 at 5:38 PM
> From: "Eli Zaretskii"
> To: "Christopher Dimech"
> Cc: bug-texinfo@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: texinfo-6.7.92 pretest
>
> > From: Christopher Dimech
> > Cc: bug-texinfo@gnu.org
> > Date: Thu, 1 Jul 202
> From: Christopher Dimech
> Cc: bug-texinfo@gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 22:20:37 +0200
>
> This is what I get
>
> make -C doc texinfo.pdf
> make: *** doc: No such file or directory. Stop.
In what directory did you invoke that command? It should be invoked
in the texinfo-X.Y.Z directory c
This is what I get
make -C doc texinfo.pdf
make: *** doc: No such file or directory. Stop.
> Sent: Friday, July 02, 2021 at 7:26 AM
> From: "Eli Zaretskii"
> To: "Christopher Dimech"
> Cc: bug-texinfo@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: texinfo-6.7.92 pretest
>
> From: Christopher Dimech
> Cc: bug-texinfo@gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 21:09:48 +0200
>
> Texinfo should provide the doc file everyone will use.
??? The files needed for the command I wrote are part of the Texinfo
tarball.
Texinfo should provide the doc file everyone will use.
> Sent: Friday, July 02, 2021 at 6:58 AM
> From: "Eli Zaretskii"
> To: "Christopher Dimech"
> Cc: bug-texinfo@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: texinfo-6.7.92 pretest
>
> > From: Christopher Dimech
>
> From: Christopher Dimech
> Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 20:45:06 +0200
> Cc: Texinfo
>
> Could there be a texinfo test that users can run after setting texmf to
> determine
> if the installation was successful or not?
How about the below?
make -C doc texinfo.pdf
ristopher Dimech" , "Texinfo"
>
> Subject: Re: texinfo-6.7.92 pretest
>
> On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 12:22:03PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> >
> > That's useful to know. I edited doc/README and added this. Running make
> > install refers the user to doc/REA
On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 12:22:03PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
>
> That's useful to know. I edited doc/README and added this. Running make
> install refers the user to doc/README so I expect this is enough
> documentation of this issue.
What about adding information in INSTALL that there is more
Hi,
(just for clarity, I am managing TeX Live together with Karl, so wrt TL
I can give quite qualified comments)
> I actually don't really understand why we couldn't just install the files
> automatically under TEXMFLOCAL but I am taking the word of previous
For automatic installation I think th
On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 10:03:12AM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Thu, 01 Jul 2021, Gavin Smith wrote:
> > > Have been looking at the `TEXMF=/usr/share/texmf install-tex` problem.
> > > The
> > > conclusion from installing texinfo has been the difficulty in locating
> > > the co
Hi all,
On Thu, 01 Jul 2021, Gavin Smith wrote:
> > Have been looking at the `TEXMF=/usr/share/texmf install-tex` problem. The
> > conclusion from installing texinfo has been the difficulty in locating
> > the correct path for texmf. We could write more detailed section about it.
[...]
> > tex
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 8:08 PM Christopher Dimech wrote:
>
>
> Felicitations Gavin. Am very appreciative of the significant improvements
> to texinfo.
>
> Have been looking at the `TEXMF=/usr/share/texmf install-tex` problem. The
> conclusion from installing texinfo has been the difficulty in l
mith"
> To: "Texinfo" , "platform-testers"
>
> Subject: texinfo-6.7.92 pretest
>
> The next pretest for the next Texinfo release has been uploaded to
>
> https://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texinfo-6.7.92.tar.xz
>
> We hope to release this
The next pretest for the next Texinfo release has been uploaded to
https://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texinfo-6.7.92.tar.xz
We hope to release this in a few days' time barring the discovery of
any major issues.
There are minimal changes since the last pretest; we have made it to
make a pretest av
15 matches
Mail list logo
