> On Thu, 08 Apr 2021 13:37:13 +0200, Kamil Dudka said:
>
> On Thursday, April 8, 2021 12:33:11 PM CEST Ondrej Dubaj wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 12:02 PM Kamil Dudka wrote:
> > > On Thursday, April 8, 2021 9:47:05 AM CEST Ondrej Dubaj wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > proposing pat
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 19:36:22 -0800, Paul Eggert said:
>
> On 2/13/22 08:11, Antonio Diaz Diaz wrote:
> > Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> >> Man page: tar.1
> >> Issue: archive --> archive itself
> >>
> >> "%s: file is the archive; not dumped"
> >
> > FWIW, as a non-native English reader but so
> On Thu, 2 Jun 2022 17:06:32 -0700, Paul Eggert said:
>
> 1. If the mtime or size changes, doesn't this necessarily mean that
> ctime changes? In other words, isn't tar's current test for size growing
> redundant? This test was added in commit
> c455373e5b7fc3037ad9e4204ba6c6aac2faa10f dat
> On Sun, 09 Oct 2022 15:23:14 +0200, Christian Schoenebeck said:
>
> On Sonntag, 9. Oktober 2022 00:47:41 CEST Paul Eggert wrote:
> > Looks like you're using a shell that invokes 'tar' and passes the
> > fully-qualified file name as argv[0]. You might try using a shell that
> > doesn't do tha
> On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 16:14:42 -0500, Timothe Litt said:
>
> The hard link problem reproduces with this (note the two soft links turning
> into a soft and a hard(!) - according to tar:
>
> # ( cd / && ls -li bin/awk bin/bash && tar -cf - bin/awk bin/bash | tar -tvf
> - )
> 22683669 lrwxrwxrw
Is there a bug in
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/paxutils.git/commit/?id=d50ea31268250eea8166d62326deb4386cb65cf9
if off_t is 32-bit and intmax_t is 64-bit? It can be like that on 32-bit x86
Solaris 10.
E.g. the code below prints
L0
305419896
L0
1311768465173141112
---
> On Thu, 21 Sep 2023 09:33:57 -0700, Paul Eggert said:
>
> Could you please look at the current sources? That part of 'tar' has
> changed significantly since 1.35, and I don't see a bug in the latest
> version. If the bug's still there, please let us know.
The latest version looks correct
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 19:09:45 +0100, Sergey Poznyakoff said:
>
> > I suggest that tar check if a file exists before trying to make a
> > network connection. This would eliminate the need for --force-local in
> > (I expect) most cases. As in:
>
> Nice idea. I'll implement it.
Is there a pot
> On Mon, 27 May 2024 13:43:12 -0500, Tristan Miller said:
>
> Oh, looks like you're probably right about this. It's only the tar
> packaged by openSUSE that has this problem; tar compiled from source
> emits the error message you described and does not hang. I will report
> this issue to
> On Mon, 04 Nov 2024 18:13:38 -0800, Collin Funk said:
>
> Patch 2 fixes an off-by-one error that can be seen with address
> sanitizer.
> diff --git a/src/common.h b/src/common.h
> index df87478c..c5df79f6 100644
> --- a/src/common.h
> +++ b/src/common.h
> @@ -699,7 +699,7 @@ char *timetostr
10 matches
Mail list logo