On Tuesday, December 19, 2017 9:30:49 AM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Hi, the proposed patch [1] can still be applied, and the reproducer below is
> still valid. Please let me know I could fix something in the patch.
>
> [1] https://www.mail-archive.com/bug-tar@gnu.org/msg04443.html
gently ping
P
Hi, the proposed patch [1] can still be applied, and the reproducer below is
still valid. Please let me know I could fix something in the patch.
[1] https://www.mail-archive.com/bug-tar@gnu.org/msg04443.html
Pavel
On Sunday, March 16, 2014 10:55:38 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Hello François,
2014-03-16 17:55 GMT-04:00 Pavel Raiskup :
>
> thanks for clear report! You can try the attached patch if you wanted
> (but it
> has the same effects as yours one, just the message is little bit
> different).
> Reproducer:
>
> $ truncate -s 10M file
> $ tar cSf archive file
> $ truncate -s
Hello François,
On Thursday, March 13, 2014 14:43:55 François Ouellet wrote:
> When dumping a file which is being actively updated by an application
> (in our case it was an outlook pst file on our samba server), safe_read()
> can sometimes return 0.
>
> When it happens, sparse_dump_region() goes
